Reducing firearm access for youth at risk for suicide in a pediatric emergency department

Firearm-related suicide is the second leading cause of pediatric firearm death. Lethal means counseling (LMC) can improve firearm safe-storage practices for families with youth at risk of suicide. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of pediatric emergency department (ED) behavioral mental he...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Frontiers in public health Ročník 12; s. 1352815
Hlavní autoři: Chaudhary, Sofia, Doh, Kiesha Fraser, Morris, Emilie, Chivily, Caroline, Washington, Donnetta S., Gillespie, Scott E., Jergel, Andrew, Lazarus, Sarah, Costa, Angela, Call, Nathan, Rupp, Jonathan, Simon, Harold K.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 22.05.2024
Témata:
ISSN:2296-2565, 2296-2565
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Firearm-related suicide is the second leading cause of pediatric firearm death. Lethal means counseling (LMC) can improve firearm safe-storage practices for families with youth at risk of suicide. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of pediatric emergency department (ED) behavioral mental health (BMH) specialists providing LMC to caregivers of youth presenting with BMH complaints and to test for changes in firearm safety practices, pre-post ED LMC intervention, as measures of preliminary efficacy. Prospective pilot feasibility study of caregivers of youth presenting to a pediatric ED with BMH complaints. Caregivers completed an electronic survey regarding demographics and firearm safe-storage knowledge/practices followed by BMH specialist LMC. Firearm owners were offered a free lockbox and/or trigger lock. One-week follow-up surveys gathered self-reported data on firearm safety practices and intervention acceptability. One-month interviews with randomly sampled firearm owners collected additional firearm safety data. Primary outcomes were feasibility measures, including participant accrual/attrition and LMC intervention acceptability. Secondary outcomes included self-reported firearm safety practice changes. Feasibility benchmarks were manually tabulated, and Likert-scale acceptability responses were dichotomized to strongly agree/agree vs. neutral/disagree/strongly disagree. Descriptive statistics were used for univariate and paired data responses. In total, 81 caregivers were approached; of which, 50 (81%) caregivers enrolled. A total of 44% reported having a firearm at home, 80% completed follow-up at one week. More than 80% affirmed that ED firearm safety education was useful and that the ED is an appropriate place for firearm safety discussions. In total, 58% of participants reported not having prior firearm safety education/counseling. Among firearm owners (  = 22), 18% reported rarely/never previously using a safe-storage device, and 59% of firearm owners requested safe storage devices.At 1-week follow-up (  = 40), a greater proportion of caregivers self-reported asking about firearms before their child visited other homes (+28%). Among firearm owners that completed follow-up (  = 19), 100% reported storing all firearms locked at one week (+23% post-intervention). In total, 10 caregivers reported temporarily/permanently removing firearms from the home. It is feasible to provide LMC in the pediatric ED via BMH specialists to families of high-risk youth. Caregivers were receptive to LMC and reported finding this intervention useful, acceptable, and appropriate. Additionally, LMC and device distribution led to reported changes in safe storage practices.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Annalyn DeMello, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, United States
Edited by: Dabney Evans, Center for Humanitarian Emergencies at Emory, Emory University, United States
Ashley D'Inverno, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), United States
ISSN:2296-2565
2296-2565
DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1352815