Differences in the prevalence of intermediate hyperglycaemia and the associated incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus by ethnicity: The HELIUS study

We aimed to describe differences in the prevalence of intermediate hyperglycaemia (IH) between six ethnic groups. Moreover, to investigate differences in the association of the classifications of IH with the incidence of T2DM between ethnic groups. We included 3759 Dutch, 2826 African Surinamese, 16...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Diabetes research and clinical practice Ročník 187; s. 109859
Hlavní autoři: van Olden, C.C., Muilwijk, M., Stronks, K., van den Born, B.J., Moll van Charante, E.P., Nicolau, M., Zwinderma, A.H., Nieuwdorp, M., Groen, A.K., van Valkengoed, I.G.M.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.05.2022
Témata:
Diabetes Mellitus type 2
Ethnicity
HELIUS-study
Intermediate hyperglycaemia
Ethnicity
Intermediate hyperglycaemia
Diabetes Mellitus type 2
HELIUS-study
ISSN:0168-8227, 1872-8227, 1872-8227
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:We aimed to describe differences in the prevalence of intermediate hyperglycaemia (IH) between six ethnic groups. Moreover, to investigate differences in the association of the classifications of IH with the incidence of T2DM between ethnic groups. We included 3759 Dutch, 2826 African Surinamese, 1646 Ghanaian, 2571 Turkish, 2691 Moroccan and 1970 South Asian Surinamese origin participants of the HELIUS study. IH was measured by fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c. We calculated age-, BMI and physical-activity-adjusted prevalence of IH by sex, and calculated age and sex-adjusted hazard ratios (HR)for the association between IH and T2DM in each ethnic group. The prevalence of IH was higher among ethnic minority groups (68.6–41.7%) than the Dutch majority (34.9%). The prevalence of IH categories varied across subgroups. Combined increased FPG and HbA1c was most prevalent in South-Asian Surinamese men (27.6%, 95 %CI: 24.5–30.9%), and in Dutch women (4.2%, 95 %CI: 3.4–5.1%). The HRs for T2DM for each IH-classification did not differ significantly between ethnic groups. HRs were highest for the combined classification, e.g., HR = 8.1, 95 %CI: 2.5–26.6 in the Dutch. We found a higher prevalence of IH in ethnic minority versus majority groups, but did not find evidence for a differential association of IH with incident T2DM.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0168-8227
1872-8227
1872-8227
DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109859