Human Factors Considerations and Metrics in Shared Space Human-Robot Collaboration: A Systematic Review

The degree of successful human-robot collaboration is dependent on the joint consideration of robot factors (RF) and human factors (HF). Depending on the state of the operator, a change in a robot factor, such as the behavior or level of autonomy, can be perceived differently and affect how the oper...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in robotics and AI Vol. 9; p. 799522
Main Authors: Hopko, Sarah, Wang, Jingkun, Mehta, Ranjana
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 03.02.2022
Subjects:
ISSN:2296-9144, 2296-9144
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The degree of successful human-robot collaboration is dependent on the joint consideration of robot factors (RF) and human factors (HF). Depending on the state of the operator, a change in a robot factor, such as the behavior or level of autonomy, can be perceived differently and affect how the operator chooses to interact with and utilize the robot. This interaction can affect system performance and safety in dynamic ways. The theory of human factors in human-automation interaction has long been studied; however, the formal investigation of these HFs in shared space human-robot collaboration (HRC) and the potential interactive effects between covariate HFs (HF-HF) and HF-RF in shared space collaborative robotics requires additional investigation. Furthermore, methodological applications to measure or manipulate these factors can provide insights into contextual effects and potential for improved measurement techniques. As such, a systematic literature review was performed to evaluate the most frequently addressed operator HF states in shared space HRC, the methods used to quantify these states, and the implications of the states on HRC. The three most frequently measured states are: trust, cognitive workload, and anxiety, with subjective questionnaires universally the most common method to quantify operator states, excluding fatigue where electromyography is more common. Furthermore, the majority of included studies evaluate the effect of manipulating RFs on HFs, but few explain the effect of the HFs on system attributes or performance. For those that provided this information, HFs have been shown to impact system efficiency and response time, collaborative performance and quality of work, and operator utilization strategy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Satoshi Endo, Technical University of Munich, Germany
This article was submitted to Human-Robot Interaction, a section of the journal Frontiers in Robotics and AI
Claudia Latella, Italian Institute of Technology (IIT), Italy
Edited by: Fanny Ficuciello, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
ISSN:2296-9144
2296-9144
DOI:10.3389/frobt.2022.799522