An extension of generalized pairwise comparisons for prioritized outcomes in the presence of censoring

Generalized pairwise comparisons have been proposed to permit a comprehensive assessment of several prioritized outcomes between two groups of observations. This procedure estimates Δ, the net chance of a better outcome with treatment than with control by comparing the patients outcomes among all po...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Statistical methods in medical research Ročník 27; číslo 4; s. 1230
Hlavní autori: Péron, Julien, Buyse, Marc, Ozenne, Brice, Roche, Laurent, Roy, Pascal
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: England 01.04.2018
Predmet:
survival outcome
Pairwise comparisons
multivariate analysis
randomized trial
ISSN:1477-0334, 1477-0334
On-line prístup:Zistit podrobnosti o prístupe
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:Generalized pairwise comparisons have been proposed to permit a comprehensive assessment of several prioritized outcomes between two groups of observations. This procedure estimates Δ, the net chance of a better outcome with treatment than with control by comparing the patients outcomes among all possible pairs taking one patient from the treatment group and one patient from the control group. For time to event outcomes, the standard procedure of generalized pairwise comparisons is analogous to the Gehan's modification of the Mann-Whitney test which is biased in presence of censored observation and less powerful than Efron's modification of this test. We adapt Efron's modification to generalized pairwise comparisons. We show how a pairwise contribution to Δ can be calculated from the estimates of the survival function in the presence of right-censored data. We performed a simulation study to assess the bias, the type I error and the power of the new procedure. The estimate of Δ with the new procedure is only slightly biased even in presence of heavy censoring. We also show how this bias can be corrected when only one time-to-event outcome is analyzed. The new procedure has higher power in most cases compared to the standard procedure.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1477-0334
1477-0334
DOI:10.1177/0962280216658320