Economic growth model, structural transformation, and green productivity in China

•Two total factor productivities of China are estimated by super-DEA models.•Investment-driven growth model produces the negative effect on green productivity.•Various structural transformation have different impacts on green productivity. This study investigates the impacts of investment-driven eco...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Applied energy Ročník 187; s. 489 - 500
Hlavní autoři: Li, Ke, Lin, Boqiang
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2017
Témata:
ISSN:0306-2619, 1872-9118
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:•Two total factor productivities of China are estimated by super-DEA models.•Investment-driven growth model produces the negative effect on green productivity.•Various structural transformation have different impacts on green productivity. This study investigates the impacts of investment-driven economic growth model, as well as rationalization and upgrading of the industrial structure on green productivity in 30 Chinese provinces over the period 1997–2010. Two total factor productivities (TFP), namely energy adjusted TFP and energy and carbon dioxide emissions adjusted TFP (denoted as TFEE and TFCE respectively), are estimated using super-efficiency DEA models, and used as indices to reflect green productivity performance in China. The main results of the empirical study are as follow: (1) China’s economic growth model does not improve both TFEE and TFCE; (2) the flow of laborers from the primary, secondary, and tertiary industries helps to improve TFEE and TFCE, while capital transformation does not produce the same effect; (3) the structural changes in the manufacturing industry produce negative and positive effects on TFEE and TFCE respectively.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0306-2619
1872-9118
DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.075