Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: Benefits, challenges, and solutions

This article reviews the benefits, obstacles, and challenges that can hinder (and have hindered) implementation of routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice. Recommendations for future routine outcome assessment efforts are also provided. Spanning three generations, as well as multiple develop...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Psychotherapy research Ročník 25; číslo 1; s. 6 - 19
Hlavní autoři: Boswell, James F., Kraus, David R., Miller, Scott D., Lambert, Michael J.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: England Routledge 02.01.2015
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Témata:
Clinical assessment
Clinical medicine
dissemination and implementation
feedback
Humans
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - standards
Psychotherapy - methods
Psychotherapy - standards
routine outcome monitoring
science-practice integration
feedback
dissemination and implementation
science-practice integration
routine outcome monitoring
ISSN:1050-3307, 1468-4381, 1468-4381
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:This article reviews the benefits, obstacles, and challenges that can hinder (and have hindered) implementation of routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice. Recommendations for future routine outcome assessment efforts are also provided. Spanning three generations, as well as multiple developed tools and approaches, the four authors of this article have spent much of their careers working to address these issues and attempt to consolidate this learning and experience briefly here. Potential "elephants in the room" are brought into the discussion wherever relevant, rather than leaving them to obstruct silently the field's efforts. Some of these topics have been largely ignored, yet must be addressed if we are to fulfill our promise of integrating science and practice. This article is an attempt to identify these important issues and start an honest and open dialogue.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1050-3307
1468-4381
1468-4381
DOI:10.1080/10503307.2013.817696