HDM-RRT: A Fast HD-Map-Guided Motion Planning Algorithm for Autonomous Driving in the Campus Environment
On campus, the complexity of the environment and the lack of regulatory constraints make it difficult to model the environment, resulting in less efficient motion planning algorithms. To solve this problem, HD-Map-guided sampling-based motion planning is a feasible research direction. We proposed a...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Ročník 15; číslo 2; s. 487 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
Basel
MDPI AG
01.01.2023
|
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 2072-4292, 2072-4292 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Shrnutí: | On campus, the complexity of the environment and the lack of regulatory constraints make it difficult to model the environment, resulting in less efficient motion planning algorithms. To solve this problem, HD-Map-guided sampling-based motion planning is a feasible research direction. We proposed a motion planning algorithm for autonomous vehicles on campus, called HD-Map-guided rapidly-exploring random tree (HDM-RRT). In our algorithm, A collision risk map (CR-Map) that quantifies the collision risk coefficient on the road is combined with the Gaussian distribution for sampling to improve the efficiency of algorithm. Then, the node optimization strategy of the algorithm is deeply optimized through the prior information of the CR-Map to improve the convergence rate and solve the problem of poor stability in campus environments. Three experiments were designed to verify the efficiency and stability of our approach. The results show that the sampling efficiency of our algorithm is four times higher than that of the Gaussian distribution method. The average convergence rate of the proposed algorithm outperforms the RRT* algorithm and DT-RRT* algorithm. In terms of algorithm efficiency, the average computation time of the proposed algorithm is only 15.98 ms, which is much better than that of the three compared algorithms. |
|---|---|
| Bibliografie: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 2072-4292 2072-4292 |
| DOI: | 10.3390/rs15020487 |