The Battle for “NoFap”: Myths, Masculinity, and the Meaning of Masturbation Abstention

Critical masculinities scholarship has identified a number of ways in which abstention from sex, pornography, and masturbation works to repair and reproduce hybrid and hegemonic masculinities. Though the mercurial and plural nature of contemporary online masculinities is investigated on a number of...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Men and masculinities Ročník 25; číslo 3; s. 477 - 496
Hlavní autor: Burnett, Scott
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.08.2022
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Témata:
Abstinence
alt-right
Antisemitism
Blogs
Corpus analysis
discourse analysis
Feminism
hegemonic masculinity
Hegemony
manosphere
Masculinity
Masturbation
masturbation abstention
Meaning
Mythology
Pornography
Pornography & obscenity
Sentence structure
Sexual intercourse
social media
Sociologi
Sociology
manosphere
pornography
discourse analysis
hegemonic masculinity
alt-right
social media
masturbation abstention
ISSN:1097-184X, 1552-6828
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Critical masculinities scholarship has identified a number of ways in which abstention from sex, pornography, and masturbation works to repair and reproduce hybrid and hegemonic masculinities. Though the mercurial and plural nature of contemporary online masculinities is investigated on a number of fronts, analysis to date has often pinned down abstention to a particular subject position, often understood predominantly in its gendered dimensions. In this article, I argue that the anti-pornography, anti-masturbation movement NoFap should be understood as a site of political contestation for the meaning potential of abstention and that these subject positions should be read intersectionally. Through analysis of a large corpus of tweets (6,569) scraped from the micro-blogging site Twitter, I present evidence for seven distinct subject positions linked to discrete myths, which include extreme anti-feminist and anti-Semitic articulations. I argue that this bird’s-eye view of NoFap uniquely lays out competing myths in their specificity, facilitating a nuanced understanding of “morbid” identities.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1097-184X
1552-6828
DOI:10.1177/1097184X211018256