A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns

Summary The circular economy (CE) requires companies to rethink their supply chains and business models. Several frameworks found in the academic and practitioner literature propose circular economy business models (CEBMs) to redefine how companies create value while adhering to CE principles. A rev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of industrial ecology Jg. 23; H. 1; S. 36 - 61
Hauptverfasser: Lüdeke‐Freund, Florian, Gold, Stefan, Bocken, Nancy M. P.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: New Haven Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.02.2019
Schlagworte:
Business
business model
Business models
Circular economy
Circularity
Companies
Design
Economics
Economics and Business
Ekonomi och näringsliv
Literary criticism
Mathematical models
Morphological analysis
Nationalekonomi
Recycling
Redistribution
Refurbishment
Remanufacturing
Reuse
review
Samhällsvetenskap
Social Sciences
Supply
supply chain
Supply chains
Typology
value creation
Wording
ISSN:1088-1980, 1530-9290, 1530-9290
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary The circular economy (CE) requires companies to rethink their supply chains and business models. Several frameworks found in the academic and practitioner literature propose circular economy business models (CEBMs) to redefine how companies create value while adhering to CE principles. A review of these frameworks shows that some models are frequently discussed, some are framework specific, and some use a different wording to refer to similar CEBMs, pointing to the need to consolidate the current state of the art. We conduct a morphological analysis of 26 current CEBMs from the literature, which includes defining their major business model dimensions and identifying the specific characteristics of these dimensions. Based on this analysis, we identify a broad range of business model design options and propose six major CEBM patterns with the potential to support the closing of resource flows: repair and maintenance; reuse and redistribution; refurbishment and remanufacturing; recycling; cascading and repurposing; and organic feedstock business model patterns. We also discuss different design strategies to support the development of these CEBMs.
Bibliographie:Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1088-1980
1530-9290
1530-9290
DOI:10.1111/jiec.12763