Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method
The γ tool was developed to quantitatively compare dose distributions, either measured or calculated. Before computing γ, the dose and distance scales of the two distributions, referred to as evaluated and reference, are renormalized by dose and distance criteria, respectively. The renormalization a...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) Vol. 30; no. 9; pp. 2455 - 2464 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
American Association of Physicists in Medicine
01.09.2003
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0094-2405, 2473-4209 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The γ tool was developed to quantitatively compare dose distributions, either measured or calculated. Before computing γ, the dose and distance scales of the two distributions, referred to as evaluated and reference, are renormalized by dose and distance criteria, respectively. The renormalization allows the dose distribution comparison to be conducted simultaneously along dose and distance axes. The γ quantity, calculated independently for each reference point, is the minimum distance in the renormalized multidimensional space between the evaluated distribution and the reference point. The γ quantity degenerates to the dose-difference and distance-to-agreement tests in shallow and very steep dose gradient regions, respectively. Since being introduced, the γ quantity has been used by investigators to evaluate dose calculation algorithms, and compare dosimetry measurements. This manuscript examines the γ distribution behavior in two dimensions and evaluates the γ distribution in the presence of data noise. Noise in the evaluated distribution causes the γ distribution to be underestimated relative to the no-noise condition. Noise in the reference distribution adds noise in the γ distribution in proportion to the normalized dose noise. In typical clinical use, the fraction of points that exceed 3% and 3 mm can be extensive, so we typically use 5% and 2–3 mm in clinical evaluations. For clinical cases, the calculation time is typically 5 minutes for a
1×1
mm
2
interpolated resolution on an 800 MHz Pentium 4 for a
14.1×15.2
cm
2
radiographic film. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| ISSN: | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
| DOI: | 10.1118/1.1598711 |