Effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Aims This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri‐implant sites and edentulous ridges. Material and Methods Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers using four databases, including M...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Clinical oral implants research Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 328 - 338 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Denmark
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.03.2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0905-7161, 1600-0501, 1600-0501 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | Aims
This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri‐implant sites and edentulous ridges.
Material and Methods
Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers using four databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles up to February 2017. Articles were included if they were human clinical trials or case series reporting outcomes of GBR procedures with and without membrane exposure. A random‐effects meta‐analysis was conducted, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) between the two groups and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.
Results
Overall, eight articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The WMD of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was −76.24% (95% CI = −137.52% to −14.97%, p = .01) between sites with membrane exposure and without exposure. In addition, the WMD of the dehiscence reduction at peri‐implant sites was −27.27% (95% CI of −45.87% to −8.68%, p = .004). Both analyses showed significantly favorable outcomes at the sites without membrane exposure.
Conclusion
Based on the findings of this study, membrane exposure after GBR procedures has a significant detrimental influence on the outcome of bone augmentation. For the edentulous ridges, the sites without membrane exposure achieved 74% more horizontal bone gain than the sites with exposure. For peri‐implant dehiscence defects, the sites without membrane exposure had 27% more defect reduction than the sites with exposure. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Aims
This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri‐implant sites and edentulous ridges.
Material and Methods
Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers using four databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles up to February 2017. Articles were included if they were human clinical trials or case series reporting outcomes of GBR procedures with and without membrane exposure. A random‐effects meta‐analysis was conducted, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) between the two groups and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.
Results
Overall, eight articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The WMD of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was −76.24% (95% CI = −137.52% to −14.97%, p = .01) between sites with membrane exposure and without exposure. In addition, the WMD of the dehiscence reduction at peri‐implant sites was −27.27% (95% CI of −45.87% to −8.68%, p = .004). Both analyses showed significantly favorable outcomes at the sites without membrane exposure.
Conclusion
Based on the findings of this study, membrane exposure after GBR procedures has a significant detrimental influence on the outcome of bone augmentation. For the edentulous ridges, the sites without membrane exposure achieved 74% more horizontal bone gain than the sites with exposure. For peri‐implant dehiscence defects, the sites without membrane exposure had 27% more defect reduction than the sites with exposure. This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri-implant sites and edentulous ridges.AIMSThis review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri-implant sites and edentulous ridges.Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers using four databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles up to February 2017. Articles were included if they were human clinical trials or case series reporting outcomes of GBR procedures with and without membrane exposure. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) between the two groups and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.MATERIAL AND METHODSElectronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers using four databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles up to February 2017. Articles were included if they were human clinical trials or case series reporting outcomes of GBR procedures with and without membrane exposure. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) between the two groups and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.Overall, eight articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The WMD of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was -76.24% (95% CI = -137.52% to -14.97%, p = .01) between sites with membrane exposure and without exposure. In addition, the WMD of the dehiscence reduction at peri-implant sites was -27.27% (95% CI of -45.87% to -8.68%, p = .004). Both analyses showed significantly favorable outcomes at the sites without membrane exposure.RESULTSOverall, eight articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The WMD of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was -76.24% (95% CI = -137.52% to -14.97%, p = .01) between sites with membrane exposure and without exposure. In addition, the WMD of the dehiscence reduction at peri-implant sites was -27.27% (95% CI of -45.87% to -8.68%, p = .004). Both analyses showed significantly favorable outcomes at the sites without membrane exposure.Based on the findings of this study, membrane exposure after GBR procedures has a significant detrimental influence on the outcome of bone augmentation. For the edentulous ridges, the sites without membrane exposure achieved 74% more horizontal bone gain than the sites with exposure. For peri-implant dehiscence defects, the sites without membrane exposure had 27% more defect reduction than the sites with exposure.CONCLUSIONBased on the findings of this study, membrane exposure after GBR procedures has a significant detrimental influence on the outcome of bone augmentation. For the edentulous ridges, the sites without membrane exposure achieved 74% more horizontal bone gain than the sites with exposure. For peri-implant dehiscence defects, the sites without membrane exposure had 27% more defect reduction than the sites with exposure. AimsThis review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri‐implant sites and edentulous ridges.Material and MethodsElectronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers using four databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles up to February 2017. Articles were included if they were human clinical trials or case series reporting outcomes of GBR procedures with and without membrane exposure. A random‐effects meta‐analysis was conducted, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) between the two groups and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.ResultsOverall, eight articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The WMD of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was −76.24% (95% CI = −137.52% to −14.97%, p = .01) between sites with membrane exposure and without exposure. In addition, the WMD of the dehiscence reduction at peri‐implant sites was −27.27% (95% CI of −45.87% to −8.68%, p = .004). Both analyses showed significantly favorable outcomes at the sites without membrane exposure.ConclusionBased on the findings of this study, membrane exposure after GBR procedures has a significant detrimental influence on the outcome of bone augmentation. For the edentulous ridges, the sites without membrane exposure achieved 74% more horizontal bone gain than the sites with exposure. For peri‐implant dehiscence defects, the sites without membrane exposure had 27% more defect reduction than the sites with exposure. This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri-implant sites and edentulous ridges. Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers using four databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles up to February 2017. Articles were included if they were human clinical trials or case series reporting outcomes of GBR procedures with and without membrane exposure. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) between the two groups and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. Overall, eight articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The WMD of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was -76.24% (95% CI = -137.52% to -14.97%, p = .01) between sites with membrane exposure and without exposure. In addition, the WMD of the dehiscence reduction at peri-implant sites was -27.27% (95% CI of -45.87% to -8.68%, p = .004). Both analyses showed significantly favorable outcomes at the sites without membrane exposure. Based on the findings of this study, membrane exposure after GBR procedures has a significant detrimental influence on the outcome of bone augmentation. For the edentulous ridges, the sites without membrane exposure achieved 74% more horizontal bone gain than the sites with exposure. For peri-implant dehiscence defects, the sites without membrane exposure had 27% more defect reduction than the sites with exposure. |
| Author | Lin, Guo‐Hao Garcia, Jeffrey Luepke, Paul Wang, Hom‐Lay Dodge, Austin Kapila, Yvonne |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jeffrey surname: Garcia fullname: Garcia, Jeffrey organization: Marquette University School of Dentistry – sequence: 2 givenname: Austin surname: Dodge fullname: Dodge, Austin organization: Marquette University School of Dentistry – sequence: 3 givenname: Paul surname: Luepke fullname: Luepke, Paul organization: Marquette University School of Dentistry – sequence: 4 givenname: Hom‐Lay orcidid: 0000-0003-4238-1799 surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Hom‐Lay organization: University of Michigan School of Dentistry – sequence: 5 givenname: Yvonne surname: Kapila fullname: Kapila, Yvonne organization: University of California San Francisco – sequence: 6 givenname: Guo‐Hao orcidid: 0000-0003-1290-9994 surname: Lin fullname: Lin, Guo‐Hao email: ghlin@umich.edu, guo-hao.lin@ucsf.edu organization: University of California San Francisco |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29368353$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1URLeFAy-ALHGBQ9qZOE5ibtWqtEgrISE4G9uZVK6SeLGTlr3xCDwjT4LbLRwqgS8jy9_84_n_I3YwhYkYe4lwgvmcuiGeoMASn7AV1gAFSMADtgIFsmiwxkN2lNI1ANSqVc_YYalE3QopVuzred-Tm3no-UijjWYiTt-3IS2ReJj41eI76rjNA3mkK5oomtmH6R0_42mXZhrz1eWnG0-33ExdlpnNrx8_zWSGXfLpOXvamyHRi4d6zL68P_-8viw2Hy8-rM82hatkhUXtFArRkXLQ9LJ0ABaMazvnRNPbjhpDtpGdJCWNlbUCZVxlnUVZtkJUpThmb_a62xi-LZRmPfrkaBjyRmFJGpVCbFHWd-jrR-h1WGL-b9IloJBSyarO1KsHarEjdXob_WjiTv_xLgNv94CLIaVI_V8EQd_lonMu-j6XzJ4-Yp2f742co_HD_zpu_UC7f0vr9ebTvuM3bDOe6w |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_jre_13266 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_colsurfb_2019_06_021 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_023_05108_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2024_09_009 crossref_primary_10_1080_09205063_2023_2166337 crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v7_i19_3153 crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13057 crossref_primary_10_3390_coatings11030316 crossref_primary_10_1002_adma_202310697 crossref_primary_10_3390_dj12120405 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jormas_2023_101641 crossref_primary_10_3390_dj13060228 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actbio_2019_07_022 crossref_primary_10_1155_2023_9086628 crossref_primary_10_1002_jbm_b_35231 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_2489399 crossref_primary_10_3390_nano8050337 crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2025_1611948 crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13166 crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13165 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_022_02513_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_peptides_2023_171074 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcms_2019_01_012 crossref_primary_10_1002_cap_10144 crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_12634 crossref_primary_10_3390_app10082659 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nantod_2023_102120 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_matdes_2025_113882 crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13202 crossref_primary_10_3390_jfb14070372 crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_13841 crossref_primary_10_3390_ma13102389 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0319271 crossref_primary_10_1002_cre2_344 crossref_primary_10_1111_prd_12502 crossref_primary_10_1177_08853282221132351 crossref_primary_10_3390_ma14216642 crossref_primary_10_1002_JPER_23_0370 crossref_primary_10_3390_jfb13040194 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jormas_2022_09_018 crossref_primary_10_3390_met12122074 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_colsurfb_2021_111886 crossref_primary_10_3390_polym13101612 crossref_primary_10_1002_JPER_19_0709 crossref_primary_10_1002_app_49190 crossref_primary_10_3390_app12125889 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare9030315 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmbbm_2023_106230 crossref_primary_10_1111_prd_12518 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics14212404 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41894_019_0051_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_025_06322_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2021_103780 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10856_024_06778_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_colsurfb_2021_112102 crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14363 crossref_primary_10_3897_folmed_66_e123766 crossref_primary_10_1080_08869634_2019_1614288 crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_13426 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000039806 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jebdp_2018_03_010 crossref_primary_10_4103_jisp_jisp_55_24 crossref_primary_10_1002_adhm_202304128 crossref_primary_10_1002_cap_70007 crossref_primary_10_1002_JPER_19_0186 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina60050759 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2020_03_013 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_605X_acd672 crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v9_i4_960 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2019_05_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_addr_2021_05_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mtcomm_2024_111039 crossref_primary_10_1021_acsbiomaterials_4c01854 crossref_primary_10_32725_jab_2022_020 crossref_primary_10_1002_admi_202100606 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10266_022_00705_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_prd_12413 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jddst_2023_104180 crossref_primary_10_1111_prd_12496 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40902_024_00425_w crossref_primary_10_1002_JPER_20_0040 crossref_primary_10_1111_prd_12531 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_024_05612_7 crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules24173067 crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14340 crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14332 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_57844 crossref_primary_10_3390_dj12070202 crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_13525 crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_13646 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40729_020_00266_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpharm_2022_122065 crossref_primary_10_1089_ten_tec_2022_0106 crossref_primary_10_1155_2020_8787394 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm14113617 crossref_primary_10_3390_ma15165705 crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering9110627 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms232314987 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijom_2020_10_008 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41415_023_6113_1 crossref_primary_10_1177_22808000251345903 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_019_03183_6 crossref_primary_10_46889_JDHOR_2025_6210 crossref_primary_10_1002_cap_10234 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jds_2025_04_015 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40729_020_00274_y crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10122654 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_colsurfb_2023_113318 crossref_primary_10_3390_dj9110131 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmst_2025_02_046 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jormas_2024_101872 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_63561 crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13025 crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13388 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina58111555 crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13147 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130603.x 10.1016/S1061-3315(18)30059-3 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01615.x 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00521-3 10.11607/prd.1407 10.1097/ID.0b013e31824ee3e9 10.1111/clr.12171 10.1111/cid.12429 10.1902/jop.1985.56.4.195 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130306.x 10.1902/jop.2009.090090 10.1007/s10006-015-0513-6 10.11607/jomi.3417 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120612.x 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01424.x 10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.4.156 10.1902/jop.2001.72.4.512 10.1902/jop.2000.71.12.1904 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01408.x 10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[133:IBAAIT]2.0.CO;2 10.1902/jop.1994.65.9.881 10.1902/jop.2008.070502 10.1016/j.joms.2011.11.017 10.1016/j.jpor.2012.12.001 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00128 10.1563/1548-1336(2006)32[237:UOTMFS]2.0.CO;2 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.12.035 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.119 10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90113-5 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100404.x 10.11607/prd.2097 10.11607/prd.2065 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100104.x 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010104.x 10.1097/01.id.0000204762.39826.0f 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01234.x 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02093.x 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00257.x 10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0287:LRAUTM>2.3.CO;2 10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.546 10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.022 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006 10.1902/jop.2005.76.2.178 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02485.x 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130113.x 10.1111/j.1600-0501.1997.tb00004.x |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd – notice: 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. – notice: Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QO 7QP 8FD FR3 K9. P64 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1111/clr.13121 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Biotechnology Research Abstracts Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Engineering Research Database Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Dentistry |
| EISSN | 1600-0501 |
| EndPage | 338 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 29368353 10_1111_clr_13121 CLR13121 |
| Genre | reviewArticle Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29B 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 6J9 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHQN AAIPD AAKAS AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABLJU ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACIWK ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZCM ADZMN AEFGJ AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFEBI AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHEFC AIACR AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE AITYG AIURR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 CWXXS D-E D-F DC6 DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS EJD F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P4D PALCI Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TEORI UB1 V8K V9Y W8V W99 WBKPD WBNRW WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WPGGZ WQJ WXSBR XG1 YFH YUY ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAYXX CITATION O8X 34H AAHHS ACCFJ ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AIWBW AJBDE CGR CUY CVF EBD ECM EIF NPM 7QO 7QP 8FD FR3 K9. P64 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4541-6c9133de9c07f52c00b0ac8dcc37fbde7aeb75d5e95ab56909ac4bcb152833423 |
| IEDL.DBID | DRFUL |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 146 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000427473400007&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0905-7161 1600-0501 |
| IngestDate | Thu Oct 02 12:05:02 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 14:39:55 EST 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:00:09 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 04:09:50 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:18:56 EST 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:24:25 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Keywords | meta-analysis bone regeneration surgical wound dehiscence alveolar ridge augmentation evidence-based dentistry review |
| Language | English |
| License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4541-6c9133de9c07f52c00b0ac8dcc37fbde7aeb75d5e95ab56909ac4bcb152833423 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-1290-9994 0000-0003-4238-1799 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/clr.13121 |
| PMID | 29368353 |
| PQID | 2013559546 |
| PQPubID | 2045176 |
| PageCount | 11 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1991181562 proquest_journals_2013559546 pubmed_primary_29368353 crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_13121 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_clr_13121 wiley_primary_10_1111_clr_13121_CLR13121 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | March 2018 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-03-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2018 text: March 2018 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Denmark |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Denmark – name: Brussels |
| PublicationTitle | Clinical oral implants research |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Clin Oral Implants Res |
| PublicationYear | 2018 |
| Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| References | e_1_2_6_1_6_1 Bartee B. K. (e_1_2_6_2_9_1) 1995; 21 e_1_2_6_1_8_1 e_1_2_6_1_2_1 e_1_2_6_2_60_1 e_1_2_6_1_4_1 Arx T. (e_1_2_6_2_5_1) 1996; 11 e_1_2_6_2_64_1 e_1_2_6_2_19_1 e_1_2_6_2_41_1 e_1_2_6_2_62_1 e_1_2_6_2_17_1 e_1_2_6_2_22_1 e_1_2_6_2_43_1 e_1_2_6_2_24_1 e_1_2_6_2_59_1 Urban I. A. (e_1_2_6_2_58_1) 2011; 26 Nowzari H. (e_1_2_6_1_7_1) 1995; 10 Lim G. (e_1_2_6_2_27_1) 2017; 33 Chin M. (e_1_2_6_2_15_1) 1999; 7 Seibert J. S. (e_1_2_6_2_47_1) 1983; 4 Zitzmann N. U. (e_1_2_6_2_65_1) 1997; 12 e_1_2_6_2_31_1 e_1_2_6_2_52_1 Chiapasco M. (e_1_2_6_2_14_1) 2001; 16 Simion M. (e_1_2_6_2_50_1) 1992; 12 e_1_2_6_2_54_1 e_1_2_6_2_35_1 e_1_2_6_2_56_1 e_1_2_6_2_4_1 e_1_2_6_2_12_1 e_1_2_6_2_26_1 e_1_2_6_2_2_1 e_1_2_6_2_10_1 e_1_2_6_2_28_1 e_1_2_6_2_49_1 e_1_2_6_2_6_1 Lorenzoni M. (e_1_2_6_2_30_1) 1998; 13 Wang H. L. (e_1_2_6_2_61_1) 2002; 22 Tawil G. (e_1_2_6_1_9_1) 2001; 16 e_1_2_6_1_3_1 e_1_2_6_1_5_1 Lyford R. H. (e_1_2_6_2_33_1) 2003; 23 e_1_2_6_2_40_1 e_1_2_6_2_18_1 e_1_2_6_2_21_1 e_1_2_6_2_44_1 e_1_2_6_2_16_1 e_1_2_6_2_23_1 e_1_2_6_2_46_1 e_1_2_6_2_37_1 Parodi R. (e_1_2_6_2_42_1) 1998; 18 Buser D. (e_1_2_6_2_11_1) 2004; 19 Greenstein G. (e_1_2_6_2_20_1) 2015; 36 Proussaefs P. (e_1_2_6_2_45_1) 2003; 23 Merli M. (e_1_2_6_2_38_1) 2015; 8 Bahat O. (e_1_2_6_2_8_1) 2001; 21 Misch C. M. (e_1_2_6_2_39_1) 1997; 12 Wang H. L. (e_1_2_6_2_63_1) 2004; 24 e_1_2_6_2_51_1 e_1_2_6_2_53_1 e_1_2_6_2_32_1 e_1_2_6_2_55_1 e_1_2_6_2_34_1 e_1_2_6_2_57_1 e_1_2_6_2_13_1 e_1_2_6_2_25_1 e_1_2_6_2_3_1 e_1_2_6_2_29_1 Sethi A. (e_1_2_6_2_48_1) 2001; 16 e_1_2_6_2_7_1 Mellonig J. T. (e_1_2_6_2_36_1) 1995; 15 29653671 - J Am Dent Assoc. 2018 Aug;149(8):e119. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.02.009 |
| References_xml | – ident: e_1_2_6_2_19_1 doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130603.x – volume: 12 start-page: 767 year: 1997 ident: e_1_2_6_2_39_1 article-title: Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants – volume: 7 start-page: 41 year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_6_2_15_1 article-title: Distraction osteogenesis for dental implants publication-title: Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America doi: 10.1016/S1061-3315(18)30059-3 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_56_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01615.x – ident: e_1_2_6_2_43_1 doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00521-3 – volume: 12 start-page: 462 year: 1992 ident: e_1_2_6_2_50_1 article-title: Jawbone enlargement using immediate implant placement associated with a split‐crest technique and guided tissue regeneration publication-title: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry – ident: e_1_2_6_2_59_1 doi: 10.11607/prd.1407 – ident: e_1_2_6_1_2_1 doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31824ee3e9 – ident: e_1_2_6_1_5_1 doi: 10.1111/clr.12171 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_37_1 doi: 10.1111/cid.12429 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_2_1 doi: 10.1902/jop.1985.56.4.195 – volume: 13 start-page: 639 year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_6_2_30_1 article-title: Treatment of peri‐implant defects with guided bone regeneration: A comparative clinical study with various membranes and bone grafts publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants – volume: 16 start-page: 43 year: 2001 ident: e_1_2_6_2_14_1 article-title: Vertical distraction osteogenesis of edentulous ridges for improvement of oral implant positioning: A clinical report of preliminary results publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants – ident: e_1_2_6_2_31_1 doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130306.x – ident: e_1_2_6_2_41_1 doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090090 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_57_1 doi: 10.1007/s10006-015-0513-6 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_29_1 doi: 10.11607/jomi.3417 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_3_1 doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120612.x – ident: e_1_2_6_2_54_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01424.x – ident: e_1_2_6_2_25_1 doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.4.156 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_34_1 doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.4.512 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_35_1 doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.12.1904 – ident: e_1_2_6_1_8_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01408.x – volume: 33 start-page: 41 year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_6_2_27_1 article-title: Wound healing complications following guided bone regeneration for ridge augmentation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants – volume: 16 start-page: 378 year: 2001 ident: e_1_2_6_2_48_1 article-title: Ridge augmentation using mandibular block bone grafts: Preliminary results of an ongoing prospective study publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants – volume: 19 start-page: 43 year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_6_2_11_1 article-title: Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: Anatomic and surgical considerations publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants – ident: e_1_2_6_2_24_1 doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[133:IBAAIT]2.0.CO;2 – volume: 11 start-page: 387 year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_6_2_5_1 article-title: The time technique: A new method for localized alveolar ridge augmentation prior to placement of dental implants publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants – ident: e_1_2_6_1_6_1 doi: 10.1902/jop.1994.65.9.881 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_23_1 doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070502 – volume: 23 start-page: 185 year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_6_2_45_1 article-title: The use of titanium mesh in conjunction with autogenous bone graft and inorganic bovine bone mineral (Bio‐Oss) for localized alveolar ridge augmentation: A human study publication-title: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry – volume: 26 start-page: 404 year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_6_2_58_1 article-title: Horizontal ridge augmentation with a resorbable membrane and particulated autogenous bone with or without anorganic bovine bone‐derived mineral: A prospective case series in 22 patients publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants – ident: e_1_2_6_2_21_1 doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.11.017 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_46_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2012.12.001 – volume: 24 start-page: 232 year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_6_2_63_1 article-title: “Sandwich” bone augmentation technique: Rationale and report of pilot cases publication-title: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry – ident: e_1_2_6_2_60_1 doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00128 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_44_1 doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2006)32[237:UOTMFS]2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_28_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.12.035 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_49_1 doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_53_1 doi: 10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.119 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_10_1 doi: 10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90113-5 – ident: e_1_2_6_1_4_1 doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100404.x – ident: e_1_2_6_2_12_1 doi: 10.11607/prd.2097 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_64_1 doi: 10.11607/prd.2065 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_6_1 doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100104.x – ident: e_1_2_6_1_3_1 doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010104.x – volume: 21 start-page: 88 year: 1995 ident: e_1_2_6_2_9_1 article-title: Evaluation of a high‐density polytetrafluoroethylene (n‐PTFE) membrane as a barrier material to facilitate guided bone regeneration in the rat mandible publication-title: Journal of Oral Implantology – ident: e_1_2_6_2_62_1 doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000204762.39826.0f – ident: e_1_2_6_2_4_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01234.x – ident: e_1_2_6_2_17_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02093.x – volume: 4 start-page: 437 year: 1983 ident: e_1_2_6_2_47_1 article-title: Reconstruction of deformed, partially edentulous ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. Part I. Technique and wound healing publication-title: Compendium of Continuing Education – volume: 10 start-page: 67 year: 1995 ident: e_1_2_6_1_7_1 article-title: Microbiologic and clinical study of polytetrafluoroethylene membranes for guided bone regeneration around implants publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants – volume: 21 start-page: 357 year: 2001 ident: e_1_2_6_2_8_1 article-title: Implant placement in three‐dimensional grafts in the anterior jaw publication-title: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry – volume: 18 start-page: 266 year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_6_2_42_1 article-title: Implant placement in large edentulous ridges expanded by gbr using a bioresorbable collagen membrane publication-title: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry – ident: e_1_2_6_2_40_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00257.x – volume: 16 start-page: 857 year: 2001 ident: e_1_2_6_1_9_1 article-title: Clinical evaluation of a bilayered collagen membrane (bio‐gide) supported by autografts in the treatment of bone defects around implants publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants – volume: 22 start-page: 335 year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_6_2_61_1 article-title: HVC ridge deficiency classification: A therapeutically oriented classification publication-title: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry – ident: e_1_2_6_2_7_1 doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0287:LRAUTM>2.3.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_55_1 doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.546 – volume: 12 start-page: 844 year: 1997 ident: e_1_2_6_2_65_1 article-title: Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with bio‐oss for guided bone regeneration publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants – ident: e_1_2_6_2_32_1 doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.022 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_26_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006 – volume: 15 start-page: 168 year: 1995 ident: e_1_2_6_2_36_1 article-title: Guided bone regeneration of bone defects associated with implants: An evidence‐based outcome assessment publication-title: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry – ident: e_1_2_6_2_22_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_18_1 doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.2.178 – volume: 8 start-page: 271 year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_6_2_38_1 article-title: Comparing membranes and bone substitutes in a one‐stage procedure for horizontal bone augmentation. A double‐blind randomised controlled trial publication-title: European Journal of Oral Implantology – ident: e_1_2_6_2_13_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02485.x – volume: 23 start-page: 417 year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_6_2_33_1 article-title: Clinical evaluation of freeze‐dried block allografts for alveolar ridge augmentation: A case series publication-title: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry – ident: e_1_2_6_2_52_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x – volume: 36 start-page: 465 year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_6_2_20_1 article-title: Utilization of d‐ptfe barriers for post‐extraction bone regeneration in preparation for dental implants publication-title: Compendium of Continuing Education – ident: e_1_2_6_2_16_1 doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130113.x – ident: e_1_2_6_2_51_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.1997.tb00004.x – reference: 29653671 - J Am Dent Assoc. 2018 Aug;149(8):e119. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.02.009 |
| SSID | ssj0006989 |
| Score | 2.5811558 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Aims
This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri‐implant sites and edentulous ridges.... This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri-implant sites and edentulous ridges.... AimsThis review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri‐implant sites and edentulous... This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri-implant sites and edentulous... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 328 |
| SubjectTerms | Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Augmentation Bone growth Bone Regeneration Bone Transplantation Clinical trials Confidence intervals Databases, Factual Dehiscence Dental Implantation, Endosseous evidence‐based dentistry Exposure Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods Humans Literature reviews Medical research Membranes, Artificial Meta-analysis Mouth, Edentulous Quantitative analysis Regeneration Regeneration (physiology) review surgical wound dehiscence Treatment Outcome Wound Healing |
| Title | Effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
| URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fclr.13121 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29368353 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2013559546 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1991181562 |
| Volume | 29 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000427473400007&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1600-0501 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0006989 issn: 0905-7161 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19990101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEB50FfTi-7G-iOLBS6WvbBI9ieviYRERhb3V5tFF2G1l1xWP_gR_o7_ESdutLioI3kqbJsM8kplk8g3AofF9gQtJw9GB6zqhMNSRQnJHcamZZgHTOseZbbOrK97piOspOB3fhSnwIaoNN2sZ-XxtDTyWwy9GrnqDYy_w7CXyGR_1NqzBTPOmddeuJmJbGzGH2nOpg2GBVwIL2USe6ufJ5eibjznpsuZrTmvxX9QuwULpapKzQjeWYcqkKzDXtOlBtsLbKtwX0MUkS0jf9LH31BDz8pjZTUOSpaQ7etBGE5nh-4Hp5gDVVo4n5Ix8IkCT4vYLiVON3TzF769vcYl0sgZ3rYvb80unrLjgqJCGntNQAmNWbYRyWUJ95brSjRXXSgUskdqw2EhGNTWCxpJiYC1iFUolPQsRY7EE16GWIlGbQHgQ0oAFiT2nC3HS4AlPTCIp84RCVzmsw9GY8ZEq4chtVYxeNA5LkGVRzrI6HFRNHwsMjp8a7YylF5VmOIzQu0F_Cglo1GG_-owGZE9FkKnZaBjZ3C_PYub4ddgopF6Ngr5QA13UAInNhfv78NF5-yZ_2Pp7022YRwJ5kdG2A7Wnwcjswqx6RjUY7ME06_C9Uqc_ABPv-MY |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS-RAEC5kFPTic9Xx2S4evESSSXo6LV5EHVw2DosoeMumHxFBk2HGEY_-BH-jv8SqJBMVFQRvIel0F_Xoruqu_gpg27ZaEheStmN813UCabmjpAodHSojjPCFMQXObCS63fDyUv4bg_3RXZgSH6LecCPLKOZrMnDakH5j5fqmv-v5Ht0iHw9QjXgDxo_OOhdRPRNTccQCa8_lDsYFXoUsRJk89c_v16MPTuZ7n7VYdDozPyN3FqYrZ5MdlNoxB2M2m4fJI0oQohpvC_C_BC9mecpu7S12n1lmH3o5bRuyPGNXw2tjDVM5vu_bqwKimiS5xw7YKwY0K--_sCQz2M1d8vz4lFRYJ7_gonN8fnjiVDUXHB3wwHPaWmLUaqzUrkh5S7uuchMdGq19kSpjRWKV4IZbyRPFMbSWiQ6UVh6BxBCa4CI0MiRqGVjoB9wXfkondQFOG2EapjZVXHhSo7McNGFnxPlYV4DkVBfjJh4FJsiyuGBZE37XTXslCsdnjdZG4osrQxzE6N-gR4UEtJuwVX9GE6JzEWRqPhzElP3lEWpOqwlLpdjrUdAbaqOT6iOxhXS_Hj4-jM6Kh5XvN92EyZPz0yiO_nT_rsIUEhuW-W1r0LjrD-06TOh7VIn-RqXaLxnT-84 |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEB4WV9SL78f6jOLBS6XdNk0jXmTXRXFZRBS81eZREdx22Yd49Cf4G_0lTtpuVVQQvJU2TYaZTPJNMvkCsK_rdY4TiW8p17Ytj2tqCS4CSwZCMcVcplTGM9tmnU5we8svK3A8PguT80OUC27GM7Lx2ji47qn4k5fLx_6h4zrmFHnVo9xHt6w2r1o37XIkNpcjZlx7NrUwLnAKZiGTyVP-_HU--gYyv2LWbNJpzf1P3HmYLcAmOcl7xwJUdLII002TIGTueFuCu5y8mKQx6eouVp9oop97qVk2JGlC7kcPSisiUnzf1_cZRbWx5BE5IR8c0CQ__0KiRGE1w-jt5TUquE6W4aZ1et04s4o7FyzpUc-xfMkxalWaS5vFtC5tW9iRDJSULouF0izSglFFNaeRoBha80h6QgrHkMQYNsEVmEhQqDUggetRl7mx2anzcNgI4iDWsaDM4RLBsleDg7HmQ1kQkpt7MR7DcWCCKgszldVgryzay1k4fiq0OTZfWDjiIER8g4gKBfBrsFt-Rhcy-yKo1HQ0CE32l2NYc-o1WM3NXraCaMhHkOqisJl1f28-bLSvsof1vxfdganLZitsn3cuNmAGZQ3y9LZNmBj2R3oLJuUT9oj-dtGz3wGrY_tJ |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+membrane+exposure+on+guided+bone+regeneration%3A+A+systematic+review+and+meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical+oral+implants+research&rft.au=Garcia%2C+Jeffrey&rft.au=Dodge%2C+Austin&rft.au=Luepke%2C+Paul&rft.au=Wang%2C+Hom%E2%80%90Lay&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=328&rft.epage=338&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fclr.13121&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_clr_13121 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0905-7161&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0905-7161&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0905-7161&client=summon |