Effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Aims This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri‐implant sites and edentulous ridges. Material and Methods Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers using four databases, including M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical oral implants research Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 328 - 338
Main Authors: Garcia, Jeffrey, Dodge, Austin, Luepke, Paul, Wang, Hom‐Lay, Kapila, Yvonne, Lin, Guo‐Hao
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Denmark Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.03.2018
Subjects:
ISSN:0905-7161, 1600-0501, 1600-0501
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Aims This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri‐implant sites and edentulous ridges. Material and Methods Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers using four databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles up to February 2017. Articles were included if they were human clinical trials or case series reporting outcomes of GBR procedures with and without membrane exposure. A random‐effects meta‐analysis was conducted, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) between the two groups and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. Results Overall, eight articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The WMD of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was −76.24% (95% CI = −137.52% to −14.97%, p = .01) between sites with membrane exposure and without exposure. In addition, the WMD of the dehiscence reduction at peri‐implant sites was −27.27% (95% CI of −45.87% to −8.68%, p = .004). Both analyses showed significantly favorable outcomes at the sites without membrane exposure. Conclusion Based on the findings of this study, membrane exposure after GBR procedures has a significant detrimental influence on the outcome of bone augmentation. For the edentulous ridges, the sites without membrane exposure achieved 74% more horizontal bone gain than the sites with exposure. For peri‐implant dehiscence defects, the sites without membrane exposure had 27% more defect reduction than the sites with exposure.
AbstractList Aims This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri‐implant sites and edentulous ridges. Material and Methods Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers using four databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles up to February 2017. Articles were included if they were human clinical trials or case series reporting outcomes of GBR procedures with and without membrane exposure. A random‐effects meta‐analysis was conducted, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) between the two groups and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. Results Overall, eight articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The WMD of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was −76.24% (95% CI = −137.52% to −14.97%, p = .01) between sites with membrane exposure and without exposure. In addition, the WMD of the dehiscence reduction at peri‐implant sites was −27.27% (95% CI of −45.87% to −8.68%, p = .004). Both analyses showed significantly favorable outcomes at the sites without membrane exposure. Conclusion Based on the findings of this study, membrane exposure after GBR procedures has a significant detrimental influence on the outcome of bone augmentation. For the edentulous ridges, the sites without membrane exposure achieved 74% more horizontal bone gain than the sites with exposure. For peri‐implant dehiscence defects, the sites without membrane exposure had 27% more defect reduction than the sites with exposure.
This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri-implant sites and edentulous ridges.AIMSThis review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri-implant sites and edentulous ridges.Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers using four databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles up to February 2017. Articles were included if they were human clinical trials or case series reporting outcomes of GBR procedures with and without membrane exposure. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) between the two groups and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.MATERIAL AND METHODSElectronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers using four databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles up to February 2017. Articles were included if they were human clinical trials or case series reporting outcomes of GBR procedures with and without membrane exposure. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) between the two groups and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.Overall, eight articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The WMD of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was -76.24% (95% CI = -137.52% to -14.97%, p = .01) between sites with membrane exposure and without exposure. In addition, the WMD of the dehiscence reduction at peri-implant sites was -27.27% (95% CI of -45.87% to -8.68%, p = .004). Both analyses showed significantly favorable outcomes at the sites without membrane exposure.RESULTSOverall, eight articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The WMD of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was -76.24% (95% CI = -137.52% to -14.97%, p = .01) between sites with membrane exposure and without exposure. In addition, the WMD of the dehiscence reduction at peri-implant sites was -27.27% (95% CI of -45.87% to -8.68%, p = .004). Both analyses showed significantly favorable outcomes at the sites without membrane exposure.Based on the findings of this study, membrane exposure after GBR procedures has a significant detrimental influence on the outcome of bone augmentation. For the edentulous ridges, the sites without membrane exposure achieved 74% more horizontal bone gain than the sites with exposure. For peri-implant dehiscence defects, the sites without membrane exposure had 27% more defect reduction than the sites with exposure.CONCLUSIONBased on the findings of this study, membrane exposure after GBR procedures has a significant detrimental influence on the outcome of bone augmentation. For the edentulous ridges, the sites without membrane exposure achieved 74% more horizontal bone gain than the sites with exposure. For peri-implant dehiscence defects, the sites without membrane exposure had 27% more defect reduction than the sites with exposure.
AimsThis review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri‐implant sites and edentulous ridges.Material and MethodsElectronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers using four databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles up to February 2017. Articles were included if they were human clinical trials or case series reporting outcomes of GBR procedures with and without membrane exposure. A random‐effects meta‐analysis was conducted, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) between the two groups and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.ResultsOverall, eight articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The WMD of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was −76.24% (95% CI = −137.52% to −14.97%, p = .01) between sites with membrane exposure and without exposure. In addition, the WMD of the dehiscence reduction at peri‐implant sites was −27.27% (95% CI of −45.87% to −8.68%, p = .004). Both analyses showed significantly favorable outcomes at the sites without membrane exposure.ConclusionBased on the findings of this study, membrane exposure after GBR procedures has a significant detrimental influence on the outcome of bone augmentation. For the edentulous ridges, the sites without membrane exposure achieved 74% more horizontal bone gain than the sites with exposure. For peri‐implant dehiscence defects, the sites without membrane exposure had 27% more defect reduction than the sites with exposure.
This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri-implant sites and edentulous ridges. Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers using four databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles up to February 2017. Articles were included if they were human clinical trials or case series reporting outcomes of GBR procedures with and without membrane exposure. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) between the two groups and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. Overall, eight articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The WMD of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was -76.24% (95% CI = -137.52% to -14.97%, p = .01) between sites with membrane exposure and without exposure. In addition, the WMD of the dehiscence reduction at peri-implant sites was -27.27% (95% CI of -45.87% to -8.68%, p = .004). Both analyses showed significantly favorable outcomes at the sites without membrane exposure. Based on the findings of this study, membrane exposure after GBR procedures has a significant detrimental influence on the outcome of bone augmentation. For the edentulous ridges, the sites without membrane exposure achieved 74% more horizontal bone gain than the sites with exposure. For peri-implant dehiscence defects, the sites without membrane exposure had 27% more defect reduction than the sites with exposure.
Author Lin, Guo‐Hao
Garcia, Jeffrey
Luepke, Paul
Wang, Hom‐Lay
Dodge, Austin
Kapila, Yvonne
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jeffrey
  surname: Garcia
  fullname: Garcia, Jeffrey
  organization: Marquette University School of Dentistry
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Austin
  surname: Dodge
  fullname: Dodge, Austin
  organization: Marquette University School of Dentistry
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Paul
  surname: Luepke
  fullname: Luepke, Paul
  organization: Marquette University School of Dentistry
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Hom‐Lay
  orcidid: 0000-0003-4238-1799
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Hom‐Lay
  organization: University of Michigan School of Dentistry
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Yvonne
  surname: Kapila
  fullname: Kapila, Yvonne
  organization: University of California San Francisco
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Guo‐Hao
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1290-9994
  surname: Lin
  fullname: Lin, Guo‐Hao
  email: ghlin@umich.edu, guo-hao.lin@ucsf.edu
  organization: University of California San Francisco
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29368353$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1URLeFAy-ALHGBQ9qZOE5ibtWqtEgrISE4G9uZVK6SeLGTlr3xCDwjT4LbLRwqgS8jy9_84_n_I3YwhYkYe4lwgvmcuiGeoMASn7AV1gAFSMADtgIFsmiwxkN2lNI1ANSqVc_YYalE3QopVuzred-Tm3no-UijjWYiTt-3IS2ReJj41eI76rjNA3mkK5oomtmH6R0_42mXZhrz1eWnG0-33ExdlpnNrx8_zWSGXfLpOXvamyHRi4d6zL68P_-8viw2Hy8-rM82hatkhUXtFArRkXLQ9LJ0ABaMazvnRNPbjhpDtpGdJCWNlbUCZVxlnUVZtkJUpThmb_a62xi-LZRmPfrkaBjyRmFJGpVCbFHWd-jrR-h1WGL-b9IloJBSyarO1KsHarEjdXob_WjiTv_xLgNv94CLIaVI_V8EQd_lonMu-j6XzJ4-Yp2f742co_HD_zpu_UC7f0vr9ebTvuM3bDOe6w
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_jre_13266
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_colsurfb_2019_06_021
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_023_05108_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2024_09_009
crossref_primary_10_1080_09205063_2023_2166337
crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v7_i19_3153
crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13057
crossref_primary_10_3390_coatings11030316
crossref_primary_10_1002_adma_202310697
crossref_primary_10_3390_dj12120405
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jormas_2023_101641
crossref_primary_10_3390_dj13060228
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actbio_2019_07_022
crossref_primary_10_1155_2023_9086628
crossref_primary_10_1002_jbm_b_35231
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_2489399
crossref_primary_10_3390_nano8050337
crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2025_1611948
crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13166
crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13165
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_022_02513_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_peptides_2023_171074
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcms_2019_01_012
crossref_primary_10_1002_cap_10144
crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_12634
crossref_primary_10_3390_app10082659
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nantod_2023_102120
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_matdes_2025_113882
crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13202
crossref_primary_10_3390_jfb14070372
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_13841
crossref_primary_10_3390_ma13102389
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0319271
crossref_primary_10_1002_cre2_344
crossref_primary_10_1111_prd_12502
crossref_primary_10_1177_08853282221132351
crossref_primary_10_3390_ma14216642
crossref_primary_10_1002_JPER_23_0370
crossref_primary_10_3390_jfb13040194
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jormas_2022_09_018
crossref_primary_10_3390_met12122074
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_colsurfb_2021_111886
crossref_primary_10_3390_polym13101612
crossref_primary_10_1002_JPER_19_0709
crossref_primary_10_1002_app_49190
crossref_primary_10_3390_app12125889
crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare9030315
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmbbm_2023_106230
crossref_primary_10_1111_prd_12518
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics14212404
crossref_primary_10_1007_s41894_019_0051_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_025_06322_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2021_103780
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10856_024_06778_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_colsurfb_2021_112102
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14363
crossref_primary_10_3897_folmed_66_e123766
crossref_primary_10_1080_08869634_2019_1614288
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_13426
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000039806
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jebdp_2018_03_010
crossref_primary_10_4103_jisp_jisp_55_24
crossref_primary_10_1002_adhm_202304128
crossref_primary_10_1002_cap_70007
crossref_primary_10_1002_JPER_19_0186
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina60050759
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2020_03_013
crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_605X_acd672
crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v9_i4_960
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2019_05_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_addr_2021_05_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mtcomm_2024_111039
crossref_primary_10_1021_acsbiomaterials_4c01854
crossref_primary_10_32725_jab_2022_020
crossref_primary_10_1002_admi_202100606
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10266_022_00705_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_prd_12413
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jddst_2023_104180
crossref_primary_10_1111_prd_12496
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40902_024_00425_w
crossref_primary_10_1002_JPER_20_0040
crossref_primary_10_1111_prd_12531
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_024_05612_7
crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules24173067
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14340
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14332
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_57844
crossref_primary_10_3390_dj12070202
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_13525
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_13646
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40729_020_00266_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpharm_2022_122065
crossref_primary_10_1089_ten_tec_2022_0106
crossref_primary_10_1155_2020_8787394
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm14113617
crossref_primary_10_3390_ma15165705
crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering9110627
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms232314987
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijom_2020_10_008
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41415_023_6113_1
crossref_primary_10_1177_22808000251345903
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_019_03183_6
crossref_primary_10_46889_JDHOR_2025_6210
crossref_primary_10_1002_cap_10234
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jds_2025_04_015
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40729_020_00274_y
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10122654
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_colsurfb_2023_113318
crossref_primary_10_3390_dj9110131
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmst_2025_02_046
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jormas_2024_101872
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_63561
crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13025
crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13388
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina58111555
crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_13147
Cites_doi 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130603.x
10.1016/S1061-3315(18)30059-3
10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01615.x
10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00521-3
10.11607/prd.1407
10.1097/ID.0b013e31824ee3e9
10.1111/clr.12171
10.1111/cid.12429
10.1902/jop.1985.56.4.195
10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130306.x
10.1902/jop.2009.090090
10.1007/s10006-015-0513-6
10.11607/jomi.3417
10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120612.x
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01424.x
10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.4.156
10.1902/jop.2001.72.4.512
10.1902/jop.2000.71.12.1904
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01408.x
10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[133:IBAAIT]2.0.CO;2
10.1902/jop.1994.65.9.881
10.1902/jop.2008.070502
10.1016/j.joms.2011.11.017
10.1016/j.jpor.2012.12.001
10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00128
10.1563/1548-1336(2006)32[237:UOTMFS]2.0.CO;2
10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.12.035
10.1186/1471-2288-7-10
10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.119
10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90113-5
10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100404.x
10.11607/prd.2097
10.11607/prd.2065
10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100104.x
10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010104.x
10.1097/01.id.0000204762.39826.0f
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01234.x
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02093.x
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00257.x
10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0287:LRAUTM>2.3.CO;2
10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.546
10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.022
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
10.1902/jop.2005.76.2.178
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02485.x
10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x
10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130113.x
10.1111/j.1600-0501.1997.tb00004.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Copyright_xml – notice: 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
– notice: 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
7QP
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
DOI 10.1111/clr.13121
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Dentistry
EISSN 1600-0501
EndPage 338
ExternalDocumentID 29368353
10_1111_clr_13121
CLR13121
Genre reviewArticle
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
29B
31~
33P
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
6J9
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAKAS
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZCM
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHBTC
AHEFC
AIACR
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
AITYG
AIURR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
CWXXS
D-E
D-F
DC6
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.T
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
PALCI
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
V8K
V9Y
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WBNRW
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WPGGZ
WQJ
WXSBR
XG1
YFH
YUY
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAYXX
CITATION
O8X
34H
AAHHS
ACCFJ
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEQDE
AIWBW
AJBDE
CGR
CUY
CVF
EBD
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
7QP
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4541-6c9133de9c07f52c00b0ac8dcc37fbde7aeb75d5e95ab56909ac4bcb152833423
IEDL.DBID DRFUL
ISICitedReferencesCount 146
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000427473400007&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0905-7161
1600-0501
IngestDate Thu Oct 02 12:05:02 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 14:39:55 EST 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:00:09 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 04:09:50 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:18:56 EST 2025
Sun Sep 21 06:24:25 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords meta-analysis
bone regeneration
surgical wound dehiscence
alveolar ridge augmentation
evidence-based dentistry
review
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4541-6c9133de9c07f52c00b0ac8dcc37fbde7aeb75d5e95ab56909ac4bcb152833423
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ORCID 0000-0003-1290-9994
0000-0003-4238-1799
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/clr.13121
PMID 29368353
PQID 2013559546
PQPubID 2045176
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1991181562
proquest_journals_2013559546
pubmed_primary_29368353
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_13121
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_clr_13121
wiley_primary_10_1111_clr_13121_CLR13121
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate March 2018
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2018
  text: March 2018
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Denmark
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Denmark
– name: Brussels
PublicationTitle Clinical oral implants research
PublicationTitleAlternate Clin Oral Implants Res
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References e_1_2_6_1_6_1
Bartee B. K. (e_1_2_6_2_9_1) 1995; 21
e_1_2_6_1_8_1
e_1_2_6_1_2_1
e_1_2_6_2_60_1
e_1_2_6_1_4_1
Arx T. (e_1_2_6_2_5_1) 1996; 11
e_1_2_6_2_64_1
e_1_2_6_2_19_1
e_1_2_6_2_41_1
e_1_2_6_2_62_1
e_1_2_6_2_17_1
e_1_2_6_2_22_1
e_1_2_6_2_43_1
e_1_2_6_2_24_1
e_1_2_6_2_59_1
Urban I. A. (e_1_2_6_2_58_1) 2011; 26
Nowzari H. (e_1_2_6_1_7_1) 1995; 10
Lim G. (e_1_2_6_2_27_1) 2017; 33
Chin M. (e_1_2_6_2_15_1) 1999; 7
Seibert J. S. (e_1_2_6_2_47_1) 1983; 4
Zitzmann N. U. (e_1_2_6_2_65_1) 1997; 12
e_1_2_6_2_31_1
e_1_2_6_2_52_1
Chiapasco M. (e_1_2_6_2_14_1) 2001; 16
Simion M. (e_1_2_6_2_50_1) 1992; 12
e_1_2_6_2_54_1
e_1_2_6_2_35_1
e_1_2_6_2_56_1
e_1_2_6_2_4_1
e_1_2_6_2_12_1
e_1_2_6_2_26_1
e_1_2_6_2_2_1
e_1_2_6_2_10_1
e_1_2_6_2_28_1
e_1_2_6_2_49_1
e_1_2_6_2_6_1
Lorenzoni M. (e_1_2_6_2_30_1) 1998; 13
Wang H. L. (e_1_2_6_2_61_1) 2002; 22
Tawil G. (e_1_2_6_1_9_1) 2001; 16
e_1_2_6_1_3_1
e_1_2_6_1_5_1
Lyford R. H. (e_1_2_6_2_33_1) 2003; 23
e_1_2_6_2_40_1
e_1_2_6_2_18_1
e_1_2_6_2_21_1
e_1_2_6_2_44_1
e_1_2_6_2_16_1
e_1_2_6_2_23_1
e_1_2_6_2_46_1
e_1_2_6_2_37_1
Parodi R. (e_1_2_6_2_42_1) 1998; 18
Buser D. (e_1_2_6_2_11_1) 2004; 19
Greenstein G. (e_1_2_6_2_20_1) 2015; 36
Proussaefs P. (e_1_2_6_2_45_1) 2003; 23
Merli M. (e_1_2_6_2_38_1) 2015; 8
Bahat O. (e_1_2_6_2_8_1) 2001; 21
Misch C. M. (e_1_2_6_2_39_1) 1997; 12
Wang H. L. (e_1_2_6_2_63_1) 2004; 24
e_1_2_6_2_51_1
e_1_2_6_2_53_1
e_1_2_6_2_32_1
e_1_2_6_2_55_1
e_1_2_6_2_34_1
e_1_2_6_2_57_1
e_1_2_6_2_13_1
e_1_2_6_2_25_1
e_1_2_6_2_3_1
e_1_2_6_2_29_1
Sethi A. (e_1_2_6_2_48_1) 2001; 16
e_1_2_6_2_7_1
Mellonig J. T. (e_1_2_6_2_36_1) 1995; 15
29653671 - J Am Dent Assoc. 2018 Aug;149(8):e119. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.02.009
References_xml – ident: e_1_2_6_2_19_1
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130603.x
– volume: 12
  start-page: 767
  year: 1997
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_39_1
  article-title: Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement
  publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
– volume: 7
  start-page: 41
  year: 1999
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_15_1
  article-title: Distraction osteogenesis for dental implants
  publication-title: Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America
  doi: 10.1016/S1061-3315(18)30059-3
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_56_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01615.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_43_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00521-3
– volume: 12
  start-page: 462
  year: 1992
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_50_1
  article-title: Jawbone enlargement using immediate implant placement associated with a split‐crest technique and guided tissue regeneration
  publication-title: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_59_1
  doi: 10.11607/prd.1407
– ident: e_1_2_6_1_2_1
  doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31824ee3e9
– ident: e_1_2_6_1_5_1
  doi: 10.1111/clr.12171
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_37_1
  doi: 10.1111/cid.12429
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_2_1
  doi: 10.1902/jop.1985.56.4.195
– volume: 13
  start-page: 639
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_30_1
  article-title: Treatment of peri‐implant defects with guided bone regeneration: A comparative clinical study with various membranes and bone grafts
  publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
– volume: 16
  start-page: 43
  year: 2001
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_14_1
  article-title: Vertical distraction osteogenesis of edentulous ridges for improvement of oral implant positioning: A clinical report of preliminary results
  publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_31_1
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130306.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_41_1
  doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090090
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_57_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10006-015-0513-6
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_29_1
  doi: 10.11607/jomi.3417
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_3_1
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120612.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_54_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01424.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_25_1
  doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.4.156
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_34_1
  doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.4.512
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_35_1
  doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.12.1904
– ident: e_1_2_6_1_8_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01408.x
– volume: 33
  start-page: 41
  year: 2017
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_27_1
  article-title: Wound healing complications following guided bone regeneration for ridge augmentation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
  publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
– volume: 16
  start-page: 378
  year: 2001
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_48_1
  article-title: Ridge augmentation using mandibular block bone grafts: Preliminary results of an ongoing prospective study
  publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
– volume: 19
  start-page: 43
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_11_1
  article-title: Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: Anatomic and surgical considerations
  publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_24_1
  doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[133:IBAAIT]2.0.CO;2
– volume: 11
  start-page: 387
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_5_1
  article-title: The time technique: A new method for localized alveolar ridge augmentation prior to placement of dental implants
  publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
– ident: e_1_2_6_1_6_1
  doi: 10.1902/jop.1994.65.9.881
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_23_1
  doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070502
– volume: 23
  start-page: 185
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_45_1
  article-title: The use of titanium mesh in conjunction with autogenous bone graft and inorganic bovine bone mineral (Bio‐Oss) for localized alveolar ridge augmentation: A human study
  publication-title: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
– volume: 26
  start-page: 404
  year: 2011
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_58_1
  article-title: Horizontal ridge augmentation with a resorbable membrane and particulated autogenous bone with or without anorganic bovine bone‐derived mineral: A prospective case series in 22 patients
  publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_21_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.11.017
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_46_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2012.12.001
– volume: 24
  start-page: 232
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_63_1
  article-title: “Sandwich” bone augmentation technique: Rationale and report of pilot cases
  publication-title: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_60_1
  doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00128
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_44_1
  doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2006)32[237:UOTMFS]2.0.CO;2
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_28_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.12.035
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_49_1
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_53_1
  doi: 10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.119
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_10_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90113-5
– ident: e_1_2_6_1_4_1
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100404.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_12_1
  doi: 10.11607/prd.2097
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_64_1
  doi: 10.11607/prd.2065
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_6_1
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100104.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_1_3_1
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010104.x
– volume: 21
  start-page: 88
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_9_1
  article-title: Evaluation of a high‐density polytetrafluoroethylene (n‐PTFE) membrane as a barrier material to facilitate guided bone regeneration in the rat mandible
  publication-title: Journal of Oral Implantology
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_62_1
  doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000204762.39826.0f
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_4_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01234.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_17_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02093.x
– volume: 4
  start-page: 437
  year: 1983
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_47_1
  article-title: Reconstruction of deformed, partially edentulous ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. Part I. Technique and wound healing
  publication-title: Compendium of Continuing Education
– volume: 10
  start-page: 67
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_6_1_7_1
  article-title: Microbiologic and clinical study of polytetrafluoroethylene membranes for guided bone regeneration around implants
  publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
– volume: 21
  start-page: 357
  year: 2001
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_8_1
  article-title: Implant placement in three‐dimensional grafts in the anterior jaw
  publication-title: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
– volume: 18
  start-page: 266
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_42_1
  article-title: Implant placement in large edentulous ridges expanded by gbr using a bioresorbable collagen membrane
  publication-title: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_40_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00257.x
– volume: 16
  start-page: 857
  year: 2001
  ident: e_1_2_6_1_9_1
  article-title: Clinical evaluation of a bilayered collagen membrane (bio‐gide) supported by autografts in the treatment of bone defects around implants
  publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
– volume: 22
  start-page: 335
  year: 2002
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_61_1
  article-title: HVC ridge deficiency classification: A therapeutically oriented classification
  publication-title: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_7_1
  doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0287:LRAUTM>2.3.CO;2
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_55_1
  doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.546
– volume: 12
  start-page: 844
  year: 1997
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_65_1
  article-title: Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with bio‐oss for guided bone regeneration
  publication-title: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_32_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.022
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_26_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
– volume: 15
  start-page: 168
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_36_1
  article-title: Guided bone regeneration of bone defects associated with implants: An evidence‐based outcome assessment
  publication-title: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_22_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_18_1
  doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.2.178
– volume: 8
  start-page: 271
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_38_1
  article-title: Comparing membranes and bone substitutes in a one‐stage procedure for horizontal bone augmentation. A double‐blind randomised controlled trial
  publication-title: European Journal of Oral Implantology
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_13_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02485.x
– volume: 23
  start-page: 417
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_33_1
  article-title: Clinical evaluation of freeze‐dried block allografts for alveolar ridge augmentation: A case series
  publication-title: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_52_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x
– volume: 36
  start-page: 465
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_20_1
  article-title: Utilization of d‐ptfe barriers for post‐extraction bone regeneration in preparation for dental implants
  publication-title: Compendium of Continuing Education
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_16_1
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130113.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_51_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.1997.tb00004.x
– reference: 29653671 - J Am Dent Assoc. 2018 Aug;149(8):e119. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.02.009
SSID ssj0006989
Score 2.5811558
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Aims This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri‐implant sites and edentulous ridges....
This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri-implant sites and edentulous ridges....
AimsThis review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri‐implant sites and edentulous...
This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri-implant sites and edentulous...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 328
SubjectTerms Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
Augmentation
Bone growth
Bone Regeneration
Bone Transplantation
Clinical trials
Confidence intervals
Databases, Factual
Dehiscence
Dental Implantation, Endosseous
evidence‐based dentistry
Exposure
Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods
Humans
Literature reviews
Medical research
Membranes, Artificial
Meta-analysis
Mouth, Edentulous
Quantitative analysis
Regeneration
Regeneration (physiology)
review
surgical wound dehiscence
Treatment Outcome
Wound Healing
Title Effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fclr.13121
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29368353
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2013559546
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1991181562
Volume 29
WOSCitedRecordID wos000427473400007&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1600-0501
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0006989
  issn: 0905-7161
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 19990101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9wwEB7BggQXoEDLlodc1AOXoHhjJw6cELDisEIVKtLeUr-yQoIE7bKIY39CfyO_pDNJNi2ilZC4RYljj-Zhz9iebwC-op5YOmgMQmF0IISJAiVzESir45S7yMW8ShQeJJeXajhMv83B8SwXpsaHaDfcyDKq-ZoMXJvJX0Zub8eHPOKURL7QQ70VHVg4u-pfD9qJmGojVlB7oQwwLOANsBBd5Gl_frkcvfIxX7qs1ZrTX30XtWuw0ria7KTWjQ8w54t1WDqj60FU4W0DftTQxazM2Z2_w94Lz_zTfUmbhqws2Gh647xjpsT3Yz-qAKpJjkfshP1BgGZ19gvThcNuHvTzz1-6QTrZhOv--ffTi6CpuBBYIQUPYptizOp8asMklz0bhibUVjlroyQ3zifam0Q66VOpjcTAOtVWGGs4QcQQluBH6BRI1BYwo3hoY22jXGH0nRDolBASvSMXCa207MLBjPGZbeDIqSrGbTYLS5BlWcWyLuy3Te9rDI5_NdqZSS9rzHCSoXeD_lQqRdyFL-1nNCA6FUGmltNJRne_OGHm9LrwqZZ6Owr6QjG6qBESWwn3_8Nnp4Or6uHz25tuwzISqOobbTvQeRhP_S4s2kdUg_EezCdDtdfo9G8FJfhl
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NbtNAEB5FaaVwKbQUGhraBXHgYuSNd_2DuEQtUREmQlUr9ebunyOk1o6SBnHsI_QZ-yTM2I5LBZWQerPs9e5oZ2Z3ZnfmG4B3KCeGLho9X2jlCaEDL5a58GKjwoTbwIa8ShROo8kkPjtLvnfg0yoXpsaHaA_cSDOq9ZoUnA6k_9ByczH_wANOWeRrAsVIdmHt8Hh8mrYrMRVHrLD2fOmhX8AbZCGK5Gl_vr8f_WVk3rdZq01n_PRx5D6DjcbYZKNaOjah44ot6B1SgBDVeHsO5zV4MStzdukusfvCMfdrVtKxISsLNl3-sM4yXeL7uZtWENXEyY9sxO4woFmd_8JUYbGbK3V7faMarJNtOB1_Pjk48pqaC54RUnAvNAl6rdYlxo9yOTS-r31lYmtMEOXaukg5HUkrXSKVluhaJ8oIbTQnkBhCE3wB3QKJ2gGmY-6bUJkgj9H_jgh2SgiJ9pENhIqV7MP71cxnpgEkp7oYF9nKMcEpy6op68PbtumsRuH4V6PBin1Zo4iLDO0btKgSKcI-vGk_owrRvQhOarlcZBT9xQk1Z9iHlzXb21HQGgrRSA2Q2Iq7Dw-fHaTH1cOr_2-6D72jk29pln6ZfN2FJ0hsXMe3DaB7NV-617BufqJIzPca0f4NCCP7bQ
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9NAEB5VCaK9tEBb6lLKgjhwceWtd_1AvVQNEYgoiiIi5Wb25QqptaM0qTjyE_iN_JLO2I4hokhIvVn2enc0j92Z3Z1vAN6inhg6aPQDoZUvhA79RObCT4yKUm5DG_EqUXgQD4fJdJqONuBslQtT40O0G25kGdV8TQbuZjb_w8rN1fyEh5yyyLtCphGaZbc37k8G7UxMxRErrL1A-hgX8AZZiG7ytD-vr0d_OZnrPmu16PR3HkbuE9hunE12XmvHU9hwxTPY7NEFIarxtgtfa_BiVubs2l1j94Vj7vuspG1DVhbscvnNOst0ie_n7rKCqCZJvmfn7DcGNKvzX5gqLHazUL9-_FQN1skeTPofvlx89JuaC74RUnA_MilGrdalJohzeWqCQAfKJNaYMM61dbFyOpZWulQqLTG0TpUR2mhOIDGEJrgPnQKJOgCmEx6YSJkwTzD-jgl2SgiJ_pENhUqU9ODdivOZaQDJqS7GVbYKTJBlWcUyD960TWc1Csd9jY5W4ssaQ7zJ0L9BjyqVIvLgdfsZTYjORZCp5fImo9tfnFBzTj14Xou9HQW9oQid1BCJraT77-Gzi8G4ejj8_6av4PGo188Gn4afX8AW0prU19uOoLOYL91LeGRuUSPmx41m3wGaFPro
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+membrane+exposure+on+guided+bone+regeneration%3A+A+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical+oral+implants+research&rft.au=Garcia%2C+Jeffrey&rft.au=Dodge%2C+Austin&rft.au=Luepke%2C+Paul&rft.au=Wang%2C+Hom-Lay&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=328&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fclr.13121&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F29368353&rft.externalDocID=29368353
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0905-7161&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0905-7161&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0905-7161&client=summon