Ten women’s decision-making experiences in threatened preterm labour: Qualitative findings from the EQUIPTT trial
•Women who present in threatened preterm labour are not fully involved in shared decision-making and have limited understanding about the predictive tests used in their care.•Pregnant women have busy lives and conflicting priorities which affect the decisions they make.•Women describe their threaten...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Sexual & reproductive healthcare Vol. 29; p. 100611 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
01.09.2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1877-5756, 1877-5764, 1877-5764 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | •Women who present in threatened preterm labour are not fully involved in shared decision-making and have limited understanding about the predictive tests used in their care.•Pregnant women have busy lives and conflicting priorities which affect the decisions they make.•Women describe their threatened preterm labour symptoms as ‘period-like pains’. Clinicians should utilize this terminology which women understand and relate to.
Clinical triage of women in threatened preterm labour (TPTL) could be improved through utilising the QUiPP App, as symptoms alone are poor predictors of early delivery. As most women in TPTL ultimately deliver at term, they must weigh this likelihood with their own personal considerations, and responsibilities. The importance of personal considerations was highlighted by the 2015 Montgomery ruling, and the significance of shared decision-making.
Through qualitative interviews, the primary aim was to explore women’s decision-making experiences in TPTL through onset of symptoms, triage, clinical assessment, and discharge.
Qualitative interviews were undertaken as part of the EQUIPTT study (REC: 17/LO/1802) using a semi-structured interview schedule. Descriptive labels of the coding scheme were applied to the raw transcript data. This coding scheme was then increasingly refined into key themes and allowed parallels to be made within and between cases.
Ten ethnically diverse women who presented at six different London hospitals sites in TPTL were interviewed. Three final themes emerged from the data incorporating 10 sub-themes, ‘Seeking help’, ‘Being “assessed” vs making clinical decisions together’, and ‘End result.’
Women described their busy lives and the need to juggle their commitments. Participants drew comparisons between their TPTL symptoms and ‘period pain,’ contrasting to typical medical terminology. Shared decision-making and the clinician-patient relationship could be improved through clinicians utilizing terminology women understand and relate to.
Women used language that highlighted the clinician-patient power balance. While not fully involved in shared decision-making, women were overall satisfied with their care. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | •Women who present in threatened preterm labour are not fully involved in shared decision-making and have limited understanding about the predictive tests used in their care.•Pregnant women have busy lives and conflicting priorities which affect the decisions they make.•Women describe their threatened preterm labour symptoms as ‘period-like pains’. Clinicians should utilize this terminology which women understand and relate to.
Clinical triage of women in threatened preterm labour (TPTL) could be improved through utilising the QUiPP App, as symptoms alone are poor predictors of early delivery. As most women in TPTL ultimately deliver at term, they must weigh this likelihood with their own personal considerations, and responsibilities. The importance of personal considerations was highlighted by the 2015 Montgomery ruling, and the significance of shared decision-making.
Through qualitative interviews, the primary aim was to explore women’s decision-making experiences in TPTL through onset of symptoms, triage, clinical assessment, and discharge.
Qualitative interviews were undertaken as part of the EQUIPTT study (REC: 17/LO/1802) using a semi-structured interview schedule. Descriptive labels of the coding scheme were applied to the raw transcript data. This coding scheme was then increasingly refined into key themes and allowed parallels to be made within and between cases.
Ten ethnically diverse women who presented at six different London hospitals sites in TPTL were interviewed. Three final themes emerged from the data incorporating 10 sub-themes, ‘Seeking help’, ‘Being “assessed” vs making clinical decisions together’, and ‘End result.’
Women described their busy lives and the need to juggle their commitments. Participants drew comparisons between their TPTL symptoms and ‘period pain,’ contrasting to typical medical terminology. Shared decision-making and the clinician-patient relationship could be improved through clinicians utilizing terminology women understand and relate to.
Women used language that highlighted the clinician-patient power balance. While not fully involved in shared decision-making, women were overall satisfied with their care. Clinical triage of women in threatened preterm labour (TPTL) could be improved through utilising the QUiPP App, as symptoms alone are poor predictors of early delivery. As most women in TPTL ultimately deliver at term, they must weigh this likelihood with their own personal considerations, and responsibilities. The importance of personal considerations was highlighted by the 2015 Montgomery ruling, and the significance of shared decision-making. Through qualitative interviews, the primary aim was to explore women's decision-making experiences in TPTL through onset of symptoms, triage, clinical assessment, and discharge. Qualitative interviews were undertaken as part of the EQUIPTT study (REC: 17/LO/1802) using a semi-structured interview schedule. Descriptive labels of the coding scheme were applied to the raw transcript data. This coding scheme was then increasingly refined into key themes and allowed parallels to be made within and between cases. Ten ethnically diverse women who presented at six different London hospitals sites in TPTL were interviewed. Three final themes emerged from the data incorporating 10 sub-themes, 'Seeking help', 'Being "assessed" vs making clinical decisions together', and 'End result.' Women described their busy lives and the need to juggle their commitments. Participants drew comparisons between their TPTL symptoms and 'period pain,' contrasting to typical medical terminology. Shared decision-making and the clinician-patient relationship could be improved through clinicians utilizing terminology women understand and relate to. Women used language that highlighted the clinician-patient power balance. While not fully involved in shared decision-making, women were overall satisfied with their care. Clinical triage of women in threatened preterm labour (TPTL) could be improved through utilising the QUiPP App, as symptoms alone are poor predictors of early delivery. As most women in TPTL ultimately deliver at term, they must weigh this likelihood with their own personal considerations, and responsibilities. The importance of personal considerations was highlighted by the 2015 Montgomery ruling, and the significance of shared decision-making.BACKGROUNDClinical triage of women in threatened preterm labour (TPTL) could be improved through utilising the QUiPP App, as symptoms alone are poor predictors of early delivery. As most women in TPTL ultimately deliver at term, they must weigh this likelihood with their own personal considerations, and responsibilities. The importance of personal considerations was highlighted by the 2015 Montgomery ruling, and the significance of shared decision-making.Through qualitative interviews, the primary aim was to explore women's decision-making experiences in TPTL through onset of symptoms, triage, clinical assessment, and discharge.AIMSThrough qualitative interviews, the primary aim was to explore women's decision-making experiences in TPTL through onset of symptoms, triage, clinical assessment, and discharge.Qualitative interviews were undertaken as part of the EQUIPTT study (REC: 17/LO/1802) using a semi-structured interview schedule. Descriptive labels of the coding scheme were applied to the raw transcript data. This coding scheme was then increasingly refined into key themes and allowed parallels to be made within and between cases.METHODSQualitative interviews were undertaken as part of the EQUIPTT study (REC: 17/LO/1802) using a semi-structured interview schedule. Descriptive labels of the coding scheme were applied to the raw transcript data. This coding scheme was then increasingly refined into key themes and allowed parallels to be made within and between cases.Ten ethnically diverse women who presented at six different London hospitals sites in TPTL were interviewed. Three final themes emerged from the data incorporating 10 sub-themes, 'Seeking help', 'Being "assessed" vs making clinical decisions together', and 'End result.'RESULTSTen ethnically diverse women who presented at six different London hospitals sites in TPTL were interviewed. Three final themes emerged from the data incorporating 10 sub-themes, 'Seeking help', 'Being "assessed" vs making clinical decisions together', and 'End result.'Women described their busy lives and the need to juggle their commitments. Participants drew comparisons between their TPTL symptoms and 'period pain,' contrasting to typical medical terminology. Shared decision-making and the clinician-patient relationship could be improved through clinicians utilizing terminology women understand and relate to. Women used language that highlighted the clinician-patient power balance. While not fully involved in shared decision-making, women were overall satisfied with their care.CONCLUSIONWomen described their busy lives and the need to juggle their commitments. Participants drew comparisons between their TPTL symptoms and 'period pain,' contrasting to typical medical terminology. Shared decision-making and the clinician-patient relationship could be improved through clinicians utilizing terminology women understand and relate to. Women used language that highlighted the clinician-patient power balance. While not fully involved in shared decision-making, women were overall satisfied with their care. |
| ArticleNumber | 100611 |
| Author | Sandall, J. Carter, J. Tribe, R.M. Shennan, A.H. Watson, H.A. Kuhrt, K. Carlisle, N. Seed, P.T. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: N. orcidid: 0000-0001-8943-8700 surname: Carlisle fullname: Carlisle, N. email: naomi.h.carlisle@kcl.ac.uk – sequence: 2 givenname: H.A. surname: Watson fullname: Watson, H.A. – sequence: 3 givenname: K. surname: Kuhrt fullname: Kuhrt, K. – sequence: 4 givenname: J. surname: Carter fullname: Carter, J. – sequence: 5 givenname: P.T. surname: Seed fullname: Seed, P.T. – sequence: 6 givenname: R.M. surname: Tribe fullname: Tribe, R.M. – sequence: 7 givenname: J. surname: Sandall fullname: Sandall, J. – sequence: 8 givenname: A.H. surname: Shennan fullname: Shennan, A.H. |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882392$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqFkcFOHSEUhkljU631BbpoWHYz14EZYMZ00xjbmphYk-uaMHBQrjNwC4ytu75GX69PUq5XXbiwsOCE_N9Jzvneoh0fPCD0ntQLUhN-uFqkeK0XtKakfNSckFdoj3RCVEzwduepZnwXHaS0qstpSNvx_g3abZquo01P91Bagsc_wwT-7-8_CRvQLrngq0ndOH-F4dcaogOvIWHncb6OoDJ4MHgdIUOc8KiGMMcjfDGr0WWV3S1g67wpdMI2hqlAgE8uLk-_L5c4R6fGd-i1VWOCg4d3H11-OVkef6vOzr-eHn8-q3TLSK5U3zEAzYii1tpBgBCKUA2l5IQKrgYhBDNDS4fe9qQVnLc1Yb3pWF0ba5t99HHbdx3DjxlSlpNLGsZReQhzkpQR3rW03BL98BCdhwmMXEc3qXgnHxdVAt02oGNIKYKV-n7a4HNUbpSklhstciU3WuRGi9xqKSh9hj52fxH6tIWgLOjWQZRJ33swLoLO0gT3Mn70DNej806r8Qbu_gf_AzPeuwY |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_birt_12805 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_023_05388_w crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_18218 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12911_021_01681_w crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_022_05202_z |
| Cites_doi | 10.2105/AJPH.79.1.78 10.1016/j.midw.2018.06.001 10.1111/1471-0528.13235 10.1177/1473325015585613 10.1016/j.srhc.2010.05.001 10.1016/j.midw.2012.03.003 10.1111/1471-0528.14589 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00070.x 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000261 10.1080/00016340701195010 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000120 10.1111/birt.12379 10.1097/00006199-199211000-00009 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2002.tb00024.x 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102864 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00229.x 10.1080/08870440008400302 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2021 The Author(s) Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2021 The Author(s) – notice: Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
| DBID | 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611 |
| DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Women's Studies |
| EISSN | 1877-5764 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 33882392 10_1016_j_srhc_2021_100611 S1877575621000185 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- --K --M -RU .1- .FO .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1~. 1~5 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AATTM AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABFRF ABJNI ABMAC ABMZM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACIEU ACJTP ACLOT ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEFWE AEIPS AEKER AEUPX AEVXI AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXBA AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP AXJTR BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV EBS EFJIC EFKBS EFLBG EJD EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FIRID FNPLU FYGXN GBLVA GROUPED_DOAJ HVGLF HZ~ J1W KOM M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OQ. OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PH~ Q38 ROL SDF SEL SES SNG SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K UNMZH Z5R ~G- ~HD 6I. AACTN AAFTH AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AFCTW AFKWA AISVY AJBFU AJOXV AMFUW LCYCR NAHTW RIG 9DU AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-a985eec51a2fffb7e77a12cefb761276ab7775db42b9f91476640159d8500dff3 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 5 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000696626800004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1877-5756 1877-5764 |
| IngestDate | Thu Oct 02 11:46:54 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:02:15 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 06:57:02 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:22:17 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:43:23 EST 2024 Tue Oct 14 19:32:24 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Keywords | Decision-making Period pain QUiPP Threatened preterm labour Preterm birth |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c451t-a985eec51a2fffb7e77a12cefb761276ab7775db42b9f91476640159d8500dff3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8943-8700 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611 |
| PMID | 33882392 |
| PQID | 2516842424 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2516842424 pubmed_primary_33882392 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_srhc_2021_100611 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_srhc_2021_100611 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_srhc_2021_100611 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_srhc_2021_100611 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2021-09-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-09-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2021 text: 2021-09-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Netherlands |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Netherlands |
| PublicationTitle | Sexual & reproductive healthcare |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Sex Reprod Healthc |
| PublicationYear | 2021 |
| Publisher | Elsevier B.V |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier B.V |
| References | Shennan, A. and Girling, J. C. (2018) ‘Premature labour’, BMJ Best Practice. Available at: https://newbp.bmj.com/topics/en-gb/1002. Stringer (b0170) 2008; 37 Porcellato (b0130) 2015; 122 NHS England (2019) Why is shared decision making important? Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/shared-decision-making/why-is-shared-decision-making-important/. Tommy’s Website (2017) Am I in early labour? Available at: https://www.tommys.org/pregnancy-information/pregnancy-complications/premature-birth/giving-birth-your-premature-baby/am-i-early-labour. Carlisle (b0030) 2021; 92 Copper (b0050) 1990; 162 Tucker Edmonds, B. (2014) ‘Shared decision-making and decision support: their role in obstetrics and gynecology’, Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 26(6). Available at: https://journals.lww.com/co-obgyn/Fulltext/2014/12000/Shared_decision_making_and_decision_support__.16.aspx. Chan (b0045) 2017; 357 Ritchie, J., Lewis, J. and Elam, G. (2003) ‘Designing and selecting samples’, in Qualitative research practice. Zorn, T. (2008) ‘Designing and conducting semi-structured interviews for research’, Waikato Management School, Waikato. doi: M412165200 [pii]\r10.1074/jbc.M412165200. Ritchie, J. et al. (2013) ‘The foundation of qualitative research’, Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, pp. 1–27. Sokol (b0160) 2015; 350 Drabble (b0070) 2016; 15 Höglund, Dykes (b0085) 2013; 29 Althubaiti (b9000) 2016; 9 Watson (b0190) 2017; 124 QSR International (2018) NVivo 12 Pro. Available at: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo/nvivo-products/nvivo-12-pro. Say, R., Robson, S. and Thomson, R. (2011) ‘Helping pregnant women make better decisions: a systematic review of the benefits of patient decision aids in obstetrics.’, BMJ open. British Medical Journal Publishing Group, 1(2), p. e000261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000261. Coster-Schulz, Mackey (b0055) 1998; 7 Weiss, Saks, Harris (b0205) 2002; 31 Watson (b0195) 2019 Gordon (b0075) 2019; 22 Abbott (b0005) 2013; 208 NHS Website (2017) Signs that labour has begun - Your pregnancy and baby guide. Available at: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/pregnancy-and-baby/labour-signs-what-happens/. Iams (b0090) 2002; 346 Joseph-Williams (b0095) 2017; 357 Bryant, H. E., Visser, N. and Love, E. J. (1989) ‘Records, recall loss, and recall bias in pregnancy: a comparison of interview and medical records data of pregnant and postnatal women.’, https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.79.1.78. American Public Health Association. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.79.1.78. Sturges, Hanrahan (b0175) 2004; 4 DeFranco, Lewis, Odibo (b0060) 2013; 208 Harrison, M. J. et al. (2003) ‘Women’s Satisfaction with Their Involvement in Health Care Decisions During a High-Risk Pregnancy’, Birth. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111), 30(2), pp. 109–115. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00229.x. White (b0210) 2019; 21 Carter (b0040) 2019 Patterson (b0125) 1992; 41 O’Brien, Quenby, Lavender (b0115) 2010; 1 Yardley (b0215) 2000 Spencer, Ritchie, O’Conner (b0165) 2003 Carter (b0035) 2018 Barlow, J. H., Hainsworth, J. M. and Thornton, S. (2007) ‘An exploratory, descriptive study of women’s experiences of hospital admission during pre-term labor’, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111), 86(4), pp. 429–434. doi: 10.1080/00016340701195010. Molenaar, J. et al. (2018) ‘Needs of parents and professionals to improve shared decision-making in interprofessional maternity care practice: A qualitative study’, Birth. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111), 45(3), pp. 245–254. doi: 10.1111/birt.12379. Palmer, Carty (b0120) 2006; 35 Palmer (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0120) 2006; 35 Watson (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0195) 2019 O’Brien (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0115) 2010; 1 Sturges (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0175) 2004; 4 Gordon (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0075) 2019; 22 Abbott (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0005) 2013; 208 Chan (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0045) 2017; 357 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0080 Höglund (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0085) 2013; 29 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0180 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0150 Iams (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0090) 2002; 346 Carter (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0040) 2019 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0110 Drabble (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0070) 2016; 15 Weiss (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0205) 2002; 31 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0155 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0135 Sokol (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0160) 2015; 350 Yardley (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0215) 2000 Coster-Schulz (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0055) 1998; 7 Porcellato (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0130) 2015; 122 Copper (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0050) 1990; 162 White (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0210) 2019; 21 Joseph-Williams (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0095) 2017; 357 Stringer (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0170) 2008; 37 Carter (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0035) 2018 Patterson (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0125) 1992; 41 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0020 Spencer (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0165) 2003 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0185 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0140 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0220 Althubaiti (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b9000) 2016; 9 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0145 DeFranco (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0060) 2013; 208 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0100 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0025 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0105 Carlisle (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0030) 2021; 92 Watson (10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0190) 2017; 124 |
| References_xml | – volume: 7 start-page: 335 year: 1998 end-page: 359 ident: b0055 article-title: ‘The Preterm Labor Experience’, publication-title: Sage PublicationsSage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA – volume: 41 year: 1992 ident: b0125 article-title: Symptoms of Preterm Labor And Self-Diagnostic Confusion publication-title: Nurs Res – volume: 357 year: 2017 ident: b0095 article-title: Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme publication-title: BMJ – volume: 35 start-page: 509 year: 2006 end-page: 515 ident: b0120 article-title: Deciding When It’s Labor: The Experience of Women Who Have Received Antepartum Care at Home for Preterm Labor publication-title: J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs – volume: 9 start-page: 211 year: 2016 end-page: 217 ident: b9000 article-title: ‘Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods’, publication-title: Dove Medical Press – year: 2018 ident: b0035 article-title: Threatened preterm labour: Women’s experiences of risk and care management: A qualitative study publication-title: Midwifery – reference: Tucker Edmonds, B. (2014) ‘Shared decision-making and decision support: their role in obstetrics and gynecology’, Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 26(6). Available at: https://journals.lww.com/co-obgyn/Fulltext/2014/12000/Shared_decision_making_and_decision_support__.16.aspx. – volume: 162 start-page: 748 year: 1990 end-page: 754 ident: b0050 article-title: ‘Warning symptoms, uterine contractions, and cervical examination findings in women at risk of preterm delivery’, publication-title: Mosby – reference: NHS Website (2017) Signs that labour has begun - Your pregnancy and baby guide. Available at: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/pregnancy-and-baby/labour-signs-what-happens/. – volume: 29 start-page: 468 year: 2013 end-page: 473 ident: b0085 article-title: Living with uncertainty: A Swedish qualitative interview study of women at home on sick leave due to premature labour publication-title: . Churchill Livingstone – volume: 208 start-page: 122 year: 2013 end-page: e1 ident: b0005 article-title: ‘Evaluation of a quantitative fetal fibronectin test for spontaneous preterm birth in symptomatic women’, publication-title: Elsevier – volume: 124 start-page: 122 year: 2017 end-page: 154 ident: b0190 article-title: Pregnancy Outcome Poster Abstracts publication-title: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology – volume: 208 start-page: 233.e1 year: 2013 end-page: 233.e6 ident: b0060 article-title: ‘Improving the screening accuracy for preterm labor: is the combination of fetal fibronectin and cervical length in symptomatic patients a useful predictor of preterm birth? A systematic review’, publication-title: Mosby – volume: 4 start-page: 107 year: 2004 end-page: 118 ident: b0175 article-title: Comparing Telephone and Face-to-Face Qualitative Interviewing: a Research Note publication-title: . SAGE Publications – volume: 357 year: 2017 ident: b0045 article-title: Montgomery and informed consent: where are we now? publication-title: BMJ – reference: Ritchie, J., Lewis, J. and Elam, G. (2003) ‘Designing and selecting samples’, in Qualitative research practice. – year: 2019 ident: b0195 article-title: Development and validation of the predictive models for the QUiPP App vol 2: a tool for predicting preterm birth in high-risk asymptomatic women publication-title: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd – reference: Zorn, T. (2008) ‘Designing and conducting semi-structured interviews for research’, Waikato Management School, Waikato. doi: M412165200 [pii]\r10.1074/jbc.M412165200. – volume: 1 start-page: 79 year: 2010 end-page: 84 ident: b0115 article-title: Women’s views of high risk pregnancy under threat of preterm birth publication-title: Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare – reference: Shennan, A. and Girling, J. C. (2018) ‘Premature labour’, BMJ Best Practice. Available at: https://newbp.bmj.com/topics/en-gb/1002. – reference: Molenaar, J. et al. (2018) ‘Needs of parents and professionals to improve shared decision-making in interprofessional maternity care practice: A qualitative study’, Birth. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111), 45(3), pp. 245–254. doi: 10.1111/birt.12379. – volume: 37 start-page: 196 year: 2008 end-page: 202 ident: b0170 article-title: ‘Symptoms Described by African American Women Evaluated for Preterm Labor’, publication-title: John Wiley & Sons Ltd – reference: Barlow, J. H., Hainsworth, J. M. and Thornton, S. (2007) ‘An exploratory, descriptive study of women’s experiences of hospital admission during pre-term labor’, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111), 86(4), pp. 429–434. doi: 10.1080/00016340701195010. – reference: Ritchie, J. et al. (2013) ‘The foundation of qualitative research’, Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, pp. 1–27. – volume: 122 start-page: 1825 year: 2015 end-page: 1832 ident: b0130 article-title: “It’s something you have to put up with” - Service users’ experiences of in utero transfer: A qualitative study publication-title: BJOG: An Int J Obstetrics Gynaecology – year: 2003 ident: b0165 article-title: ‘Analysis: Practices Principles and Processes – volume: 15 year: 2016 ident: b0070 article-title: Conducting qualitative interviews by telephone: Lessons learned from a study of alcohol use among sexual minority and heterosexual women publication-title: Qual Soc Work – reference: Harrison, M. J. et al. (2003) ‘Women’s Satisfaction with Their Involvement in Health Care Decisions During a High-Risk Pregnancy’, Birth. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111), 30(2), pp. 109–115. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00229.x. – year: 2000 ident: b0215 article-title: Dilemmas in qualitative health research publication-title: Psychology Health – volume: 21 start-page: 95 year: 2019 end-page: 101 ident: b0210 article-title: ‘Preterm labour decision-making and experiences of care for women and clinicians (QUIDS Qualitative): A qualitative exploration’, publication-title: Elsevier – reference: Bryant, H. E., Visser, N. and Love, E. J. (1989) ‘Records, recall loss, and recall bias in pregnancy: a comparison of interview and medical records data of pregnant and postnatal women.’, https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.79.1.78. American Public Health Association. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.79.1.78. – volume: 92 year: 2021 ident: b0030 article-title: Impact of a medical mobile phone app (QUiPP) for predicting preterm birth on the anxiety and decisional conflicts faced by women in threatened preterm labour publication-title: Midwifery – reference: Tommy’s Website (2017) Am I in early labour? Available at: https://www.tommys.org/pregnancy-information/pregnancy-complications/premature-birth/giving-birth-your-premature-baby/am-i-early-labour. – volume: 22 year: 2019 ident: b0075 article-title: Women who experience threatened preterm labour need early and accurate assessment, a clear management plan and continuity of care to reduce stress and anxiety publication-title: . Royal College of Nursing – volume: 31 start-page: 66 year: 2002 end-page: 76 ident: b0205 article-title: ‘Resolving the Uncertainty of Preterm Symptoms: Women’s Experiences With the Onset of Preterm Labor’, publication-title: . Elsevier – volume: 346 start-page: 250 year: 2002 end-page: 255 ident: b0090 article-title: ‘Frequency of Uterine Contractions and the Risk of Spontaneous Preterm Delivery’, publication-title: Massachusetts Medical Society – year: 2019 ident: b0040 article-title: Development and validation of prediction models for the QUiPP App vol 2: a tool for predicting preterm birth in women with symptoms of threatened preterm labor publication-title: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd – volume: 350 year: 2015 ident: b0160 article-title: Update on the UK law on consent publication-title: BMJ. British Medical J Group – reference: QSR International (2018) NVivo 12 Pro. Available at: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo/nvivo-products/nvivo-12-pro. – reference: Say, R., Robson, S. and Thomson, R. (2011) ‘Helping pregnant women make better decisions: a systematic review of the benefits of patient decision aids in obstetrics.’, BMJ open. British Medical Journal Publishing Group, 1(2), p. e000261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000261. – reference: NHS England (2019) Why is shared decision making important? Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/shared-decision-making/why-is-shared-decision-making-important/. – volume: 37 start-page: 196 issue: 2 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0170 article-title: ‘Symptoms Described by African American Women Evaluated for Preterm Labor’, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing publication-title: John Wiley & Sons Ltd – ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0025 doi: 10.2105/AJPH.79.1.78 – ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0135 – ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0145 – ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0110 – year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0035 article-title: Threatened preterm labour: Women’s experiences of risk and care management: A qualitative study publication-title: Midwifery doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.06.001 – volume: 122 start-page: 1825 issue: 13 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0130 article-title: “It’s something you have to put up with” - Service users’ experiences of in utero transfer: A qualitative study publication-title: BJOG: An Int J Obstetrics Gynaecology doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13235 – volume: 15 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0070 article-title: Conducting qualitative interviews by telephone: Lessons learned from a study of alcohol use among sexual minority and heterosexual women publication-title: Qual Soc Work doi: 10.1177/1473325015585613 – volume: 1 start-page: 79 issue: 3 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0115 article-title: Women’s views of high risk pregnancy under threat of preterm birth publication-title: Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2010.05.001 – volume: 9 start-page: 211 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b9000 article-title: ‘Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods’, Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare publication-title: Dove Medical Press – volume: 29 start-page: 468 issue: 5 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0085 article-title: Living with uncertainty: A Swedish qualitative interview study of women at home on sick leave due to premature labour publication-title: Midwifery. Churchill Livingstone doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.03.003 – ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0105 – volume: 124 start-page: 122 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0190 article-title: Pregnancy Outcome Poster Abstracts publication-title: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14589 – volume: 35 start-page: 509 issue: 4 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0120 article-title: Deciding When It’s Labor: The Experience of Women Who Have Received Antepartum Care at Home for Preterm Labor publication-title: J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00070.x – issue: ja year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0195 article-title: Development and validation of the predictive models for the QUiPP App vol 2: a tool for predicting preterm birth in high-risk asymptomatic women publication-title: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd – volume: 357 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0095 article-title: Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme publication-title: BMJ – ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0150 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000261 – ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0155 – ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0020 doi: 10.1080/00016340701195010 – ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0185 doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000120 – ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0100 doi: 10.1111/birt.12379 – volume: 41 issue: 6 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0125 article-title: Symptoms of Preterm Labor And Self-Diagnostic Confusion publication-title: Nurs Res doi: 10.1097/00006199-199211000-00009 – year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0165 article-title: ‘Analysis: Practices Principles and Processes publication-title: Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers – ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0140 – volume: 31 start-page: 66 issue: 1 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0205 article-title: ‘Resolving the Uncertainty of Preterm Symptoms: Women’s Experiences With the Onset of Preterm Labor’, Journal of Obstetric publication-title: Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. Elsevier doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2002.tb00024.x – volume: 4 start-page: 107 issue: 1 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0175 article-title: Comparing Telephone and Face-to-Face Qualitative Interviewing: a Research Note publication-title: Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications – volume: 208 start-page: 233.e1 issue: 3 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0060 article-title: ‘Improving the screening accuracy for preterm labor: is the combination of fetal fibronectin and cervical length in symptomatic patients a useful predictor of preterm birth? A systematic review’, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology publication-title: Mosby – ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0180 – volume: 346 start-page: 250 issue: 4 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0090 article-title: ‘Frequency of Uterine Contractions and the Risk of Spontaneous Preterm Delivery’, New England Journal of Medicine publication-title: Massachusetts Medical Society – ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0220 – volume: 357 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0045 article-title: Montgomery and informed consent: where are we now? publication-title: BMJ – volume: 22 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0075 article-title: Women who experience threatened preterm labour need early and accurate assessment, a clear management plan and continuity of care to reduce stress and anxiety publication-title: Evidence-Based Nursing. Royal College of Nursing – volume: 92 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0030 article-title: Impact of a medical mobile phone app (QUiPP) for predicting preterm birth on the anxiety and decisional conflicts faced by women in threatened preterm labour publication-title: Midwifery doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102864 – issue: ja year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0040 article-title: Development and validation of prediction models for the QUiPP App vol 2: a tool for predicting preterm birth in women with symptoms of threatened preterm labor publication-title: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd – volume: 162 start-page: 748 issue: 3 year: 1990 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0050 article-title: ‘Warning symptoms, uterine contractions, and cervical examination findings in women at risk of preterm delivery’, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology publication-title: Mosby – volume: 21 start-page: 95 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0210 article-title: ‘Preterm labour decision-making and experiences of care for women and clinicians (QUIDS Qualitative): A qualitative exploration’, Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare publication-title: Elsevier – volume: 7 start-page: 335 issue: 4 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0055 article-title: ‘The Preterm Labor Experience’, Clinical Nursing Research publication-title: Sage PublicationsSage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA – ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0080 doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00229.x – volume: 350 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0160 article-title: Update on the UK law on consent publication-title: BMJ. British Medical J Group – year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0215 article-title: Dilemmas in qualitative health research publication-title: Psychology Health doi: 10.1080/08870440008400302 – volume: 208 start-page: 122 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611_b0005 article-title: ‘Evaluation of a quantitative fetal fibronectin test for spontaneous preterm birth in symptomatic women’, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology publication-title: Elsevier |
| SSID | ssj0000314869 |
| Score | 2.2305334 |
| Snippet | •Women who present in threatened preterm labour are not fully involved in shared decision-making and have limited understanding about the predictive tests used... Clinical triage of women in threatened preterm labour (TPTL) could be improved through utilising the QUiPP App, as symptoms alone are poor predictors of early... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 100611 |
| SubjectTerms | Decision-making Period pain Preterm birth QUiPP Threatened preterm labour |
| Title | Ten women’s decision-making experiences in threatened preterm labour: Qualitative findings from the EQUIPTT trial |
| URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1877575621000185 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882392 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2516842424 |
| Volume | 29 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000696626800004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: ScienceDirect database customDbUrl: eissn: 1877-5764 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0000314869 issn: 1877-5756 databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 20100201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1ba9swFBZpO8ZeStfdsm5Fg8Eego3lWJbVtzBSemGhYynkzdiyTFIyt8RJ6eP-xdjf2y_Z0cWXhaVbH0bAGGEJOefz0TnSOd9B6D0hXMhIECfzcgEOigidVFDPCRLiezRNFB-LLjbBRqNoMuEXnc73Khfmds6KIrq74zf_VdTQBsJWqbMPEHc9KDTAPQgdriB2uP6b4FVmtuJVqOIYeNnLbCUd56suPmV5_XUItQl0VKYjaD3NGaCUdU-BY6VLSBqWDcsPPtNJMGWTlTL8fHl6MR73dPWPtqX7RXM5a2Qp4kzNK6uGmNYBZ83xx2I-K01Y88htdviXNhnsxB3UreerqckxOndb3W1xkTO3vYfhkzpIq1K7EWMOGI5hWy_bnRCjWImytcgfdb7Zfrhyy8VUcVL6xG0e_p1ge23hq8MRq0i3q1iNEasxYjPGFtrxGeWgLncGp8PJWb19p1j_I10wsZ67Tcky0YPrk9lk9mxya7R5M95Du9YvwQODp6eoI4t99PiTjbzYR7u61OmHEtvA02eoBKBhDbSf336UeA1iuAUxPCtwAzFsIYYNxI5wC2C4AhhWAINOEluAYQ2w5-jyeDj-eOLYEh6OCChZOgmPqJSCksTP8zxlkjFQAkLCLZjWLExSxhjN0sBPec5JwMIQHH7Ks4h6Xpbn_Rdou7gu5CuEQ-5lKaFZFsISkis7N8gYrEiCB6mKmOwiUv3DsbD89qrMyjzeLN4u6tV9bgy7y71P9yvBxVXeMqy0MQDx3l607mWtWmOt_rXfuwobMah8dY6XFPJ6VcbgkqjTc_h10UsDmnr2_T64zODzvH7Qmx2gJ81n-QZtLxcr-RY9ErfLWbk4RFtsEh3aL-AX9AzWmA |
| linkProvider | Elsevier |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ten+women%E2%80%99s+decision-making+experiences+in+threatened+preterm+labour%3A+Qualitative+findings+from+the+EQUIPTT+trial&rft.jtitle=Sexual+%26+reproductive+healthcare&rft.au=Carlisle%2C+N.&rft.au=Watson%2C+H.A.&rft.au=Kuhrt%2C+K.&rft.au=Carter%2C+J.&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.issn=1877-5756&rft.volume=29&rft.spage=100611&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.srhc.2021.100611&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_srhc_2021_100611 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1877-5756&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1877-5756&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1877-5756&client=summon |