Reporting bad news on software projects: the effects of culturally constituted views of face-saving

.  The reluctance to report bad news about a project and its status is a known problem in software project management that can contribute to project failure. The reluctance to report bad news is heightened when it bears personal risks. Oftentimes, those who report bad news end up losing face. In ext...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Information systems journal (Oxford, England) Ročník 17; číslo 1; s. 59 - 87
Hlavní autori: Keil, Mark, Im, Ghi Paul, Mähring, Magnus
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2007
Predmet:
Computer programs
cross-cultural
Cultural differences
experiment
face-saving
Failure
Impact analysis
mum effect
News
Preserves
Product development
Project management
Reluctance
Reporting
Software
Software development
Software packages
software project management
Studies
whistle-blowing
United States > US
South Korea
ISSN:1350-1917, 1365-2575, 1365-2575
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:.  The reluctance to report bad news about a project and its status is a known problem in software project management that can contribute to project failure. The reluctance to report bad news is heightened when it bears personal risks. Oftentimes, those who report bad news end up losing face. In extreme cases, they not only lose face, but may end up on the unemployment line. The need to preserve face is a powerful influence on social behaviour. While universal, it manifests itself differently in different cultures. To date, there have been no empirical studies of the extent to which culturally constituted views of face‐saving affect reporting of bad news on software projects. This is a particularly important topic given the increased prevalence of global, dispersed software development teams and offshore outsourcing of software development. In this study, we conducted a role‐playing experiment in the USA and in South Korea, to investigate the effect of culturally constituted views of face‐saving on the willingness to report bad news regarding a software development project. A blame‐shifting opportunity was chosen as the means to operationalize face‐saving in a culturally sensitive fashion. The two countries were chosen because they differ markedly in their views of face‐saving and the relative importance ascribed to two important aspects of face: lian and mianzi. Results reveal that the presence of a blame‐shifting opportunity had a significant effect on US subjects’ willingness to report bad news, but the effect on Korean subjects was not found to be statistically significant. In the absence of a blame‐shifting opportunity, we did not observe any significant differences between US and Korean subjects in willingness to report bad news. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Bibliografia:istex:406F384895EB6E4EC12470025BA19B36A6407F13
ArticleID:ISJ235
ark:/67375/WNG-7VPJ9G0G-9
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1350-1917
1365-2575
1365-2575
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00235.x