Safety and efficacy of autoantigen‐specific therapy with 2 doses of alum‐formulated glutamate decarboxylase in children with multiple islet autoantibodies and risk for type 1 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial
Objective Treatments have failed to delay or stop the autoimmune process, preceding onset of type 1 diabetes. We investigated if autoantigen‐specific treatment with alum‐formulated glutamate decarboxylase (GAD‐Alum) was safe and affected progression to type 1 diabetes in children with islet autoimmu...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Pediatric diabetes Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. 410 - 419 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Former Munksgaard
John Wiley & Sons A/S
01.05.2018
John Wiley & Sons, Inc |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1399-543X, 1399-5448, 1399-5448 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Objective
Treatments have failed to delay or stop the autoimmune process, preceding onset of type 1 diabetes. We investigated if autoantigen‐specific treatment with alum‐formulated glutamate decarboxylase (GAD‐Alum) was safe and affected progression to type 1 diabetes in children with islet autoimmunity.
Methods
In an investigator‐initiated, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trial, non‐diabetic children aged 4 to 17.9 years with autoantibodies to glutamate decarboxylase (GADA) and at least one of insulinoma‐associated protein 2, insulin or zinc‐transporter 8, were randomized, stratified by 2 or ≥3 islet autoantibodies, to 2 injections of 20 μg GAD‐Alum or placebo, 30 days apart. Main outcome was safety, investigated by adverse events, hematology, chemistry, thyroid and celiac autoimmunity and titers of islet autoantibodies, and efficacy, investigated by cumulative incidence of diabetes onset over 5‐year follow‐up. Secondary variables: change in first‐phase insulin release (FPIR) after intravenous glucose tolerance tests, fasting, 120 minutes and Area under the curve (AUC) C‐peptide and p‐glucose after oral glucose tolerance tests and HbA1c.
Results
Fifty children (median age: 5.2) were assigned 1:1 to GAD‐Alum or placebo, all receiving full treatment and included in the analyses. GAD‐Alum did not affect any safety parameter, while GADA titers increased (P = .001). Time to clinical diagnosis was not affected by treatment (hazard ratio, HR = 0.77, P = .574) in the full population or in the separate stratum groups. Treatment did not affect any of the secondary variables.
Conclusions
GAD‐Alum as a subcutaneous prime and boost injection was safe in prediabetic young children but did not affect progression to type 1 diabetes. The safety of GAD‐Alum should prove useful in future prevention studies. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| ISSN: | 1399-543X 1399-5448 1399-5448 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/pedi.12611 |