ERPs While Judging Meaningfulness of Sentences With and Without Homonym or Morpheme Spelling Foils: Comparing 4th to 9th Graders With and Without Spelling Disabilities

Thirteen students with and twelve students without spelling disabilities judged whether sentences (1/3 all correct spellings, 1/3 with homonym foil, 1/3 with morpheme foil) were meaningful while event-related potentials (ERPs) were measured with EGI Geodesic EEG System 300 (128-channel hydro-cell ne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Developmental neuropsychology Vol. 42; no. 4; pp. 284 - 297
Main Authors: Richards, Todd, Pettet, Mark, Askren, Mary, Mestre, Zoé, Grabowski, Thomas, Yagle, Kevin, Wallis, Peter, Northey, Mary, Abbott, Robert, Berninger, Virginia
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Routledge 01.01.2017
Psychology Press
Subjects:
ISSN:8756-5641, 1532-6942, 1532-6942
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Thirteen students with and twelve students without spelling disabilities judged whether sentences (1/3 all correct spellings, 1/3 with homonym foil, 1/3 with morpheme foil) were meaningful while event-related potentials (ERPs) were measured with EGI Geodesic EEG System 300 (128-channel hydro-cell nets). For N400, Rapid Automatic Switching (RAS) correlated with comprehending sentences with homonym foils in control group but with morpheme foils in SLD group. For P600, dictated spelling correlated with comprehending sentences with morpheme foils in the control group but solving anagrams with homonym foils in the SLD group. Educational significance and neuropsychological significance of these contrasting results are discussed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:8756-5641
1532-6942
1532-6942
DOI:10.1080/87565641.2016.1243110