Validation of central serous chorioretinopathy multimodal imaging-based classification system

Purpose Validation of a recently described central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) classification system and assessment of levels of agreement among 10 retina physicians. Methods This was a cross-sectional (inter-reader agreement) study. Ten retina physicians (assigned a role of masked grader) were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology Jg. 260; H. 4; S. 1161 - 1169
Hauptverfasser: Chhablani, Jay, Behar-Cohen, Francine
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.04.2022
Springer Nature B.V
Schlagworte:
Agreements
Angiography
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy - diagnosis
Choroid
Classification
Cross-Sectional Studies
Eye
Fluorescein
Fluorescein Angiography - methods
Humans
Kappa coefficient
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Multimodal Imaging
Ophthalmology
Patients
Retina
Retinal Disorders
Retrospective Studies
Statistical analysis
Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods
Indocyanine green angiography
Fleiss Kappa coefficient
Fluorescein angiography
Optical coherence tomography
Central serous chorioretinopathy
Multimodal imaging
Inter-rater agreement
ISSN:0721-832X, 1435-702X, 1435-702X
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Validation of a recently described central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) classification system and assessment of levels of agreement among 10 retina physicians. Methods This was a cross-sectional (inter-reader agreement) study. Ten retina physicians (assigned a role of masked grader) were provided with a comprehensive dataset of 61 eyes of 34 patients of presumed CSCR. Relevant clinical details and multimodal imaging (fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography, optical coherence tomography) of both involved and fellow eye were electronically shared. Later, only the fellow eye images were resent to understand the influence of affected eye on the grading of the fellow eye. Multiple inter-grader agreement using Fleiss Kappa was performed to determine the level of agreement among the 10 graders. p value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Sixty-one eyes of 34 patients were evaluated. There was moderate agreement for major criteria with Fleiss Kappa value of 0.50 ( p  < 0.0001) with a single outlier observer. After excluding that observer, the Fleiss Kappa value increased to 0.57 ( p  < 0.0001) with statistically significant p values among all categories, i.e., simple CSC ( κ  = 0.575), complex CSC ( κ  = 0.621), and no CSC ( κ  = 0.452). Overall, moderate to substantial agreement was noted among the subtypes (primary, recurrent, and resolved). The influence of the affected eye on fellow eye grading was studied. The global Fleiss Kappa coefficient ( κ  = 0.642, p  < 0.0001) showed substantial agreement when observers were aware of the affected eye grading. However, without prior available information on the affected eye, the inter-grader agreement was significantly lower (global κ  = 0.255, p  < 0.0001). Conclusion A fair-moderate inter-grader agreement among the masked graders suggests a need for further refinement of this novel classification system. Disease grading should include both eyes as lack of information on affected eye has a bearing on fellow eye grading and inter-grader agreement as shown by a significant difference in global κ values.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0721-832X
1435-702X
1435-702X
DOI:10.1007/s00417-021-05452-1