Comparison of DIC and LDV for practical vibration and modal measurements
We compare laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV) and digital image correlation (DIC) for use in full-field vibration and modal testing. This was done using a simultaneously measured 3D displacement field on a flat 7-in. corner-supported metal plate using pseudorandom excitation via a shaker. We complete a...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Mechanical systems and signal processing Ročník 86; číslo PB; s. 2 - 16 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
United Kingdom
Elsevier Ltd
01.03.2017
Elsevier |
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 0888-3270, 1096-1216 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Shrnutí: | We compare laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV) and digital image correlation (DIC) for use in full-field vibration and modal testing. This was done using a simultaneously measured 3D displacement field on a flat 7-in. corner-supported metal plate using pseudorandom excitation via a shaker. We complete a detailed comparison between the techniques and discuss the pros and cons of each. The results show that either technique can be used for quantifying the modal information with the LDV providing better out-of-plane displacement resolution and equivalent in-plane resolution. The strain calculation is considered better in the DIC approach due to the direct tie to the surface displacements. While the LDV does not lose its place as the gold standard for modal testing, DIC has introduced a new and competitive approach that will have significant advantages in certain testing regimes. |
|---|---|
| Bibliografie: | AC04-94AL85000 USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) |
| ISSN: | 0888-3270 1096-1216 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.02.006 |