Peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences

Independent evaluations of grant applications by subject experts are an important part of the peer-review system. However, little is known about the real-time experiences of peer reviewers or experts who perform reviews of a grant application independently. This study sought to gain insight into thi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben

Veröffentlicht in:	Humanities & social sciences communications Jg. 9; H. 1; S. 1 - 11
Hauptverfasser:	Vallée-Tourangeau, Gaëlle, Wheelock, Ana, Vandrevala, Tushna, Harries, Priscilla
Format:	Journal Article
Sprache:	Englisch
Veröffentlicht:	England Springer Nature B.V 04.03.2022 Springer Nature
Schlagworte:	Academic staff Applicants Application Evaluation Experts Grants Habits Humanities Interviews Peer review Peers Prestige Social sciences Thinking aloud
ISSN:	2662-9992, 2662-9992
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!