Late Neolithic to Early-Mid Bronze Age semi-precious stone bead production and consumption at Oakaie and Nyaung’gan in central-northern Myanmar

For many decades, the appearance of semi-precious stone ornaments in Mainland Southeast Asian late prehistoric assemblages was closely associated with external actors: Taiwan and Island Southeast Asia in the case of nephrite, and South Asia in the case of carnelian. Carnelian beads in particular hav...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archaeological research in Asia Vol. 25; p. 100240
Main Authors: Georjon, Cloé, Kyaw, U. Aung Aung, Win, Daw Tin Tin, Win, Daw Thu Thu, Pradier, Baptiste, Willis, Anna, Petchey, Peter, Iizuka, Yoshiyuki, Gonthier, Eric, Pelegrin, Jacques, Bellina, Bérénice, Pryce, T.O.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2021
Elsevier
Subjects:
Archaeology and Prehistory
History
Humanities and Social Sciences
ISSN:2352-2267
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:For many decades, the appearance of semi-precious stone ornaments in Mainland Southeast Asian late prehistoric assemblages was closely associated with external actors: Taiwan and Island Southeast Asia in the case of nephrite, and South Asia in the case of carnelian. Carnelian beads in particular have long been held as a type marker of early contact across the Bay of Bengal, from the mid-late 1st millennium BC. With this paper we demonstrate, from the central-northern Myanmar settlement and cemetery sites of Oakaie and Nyaung’gan, not only the presence of semi-precious stone beads, but also their production during the Late Neolithic to Early-Mid Bronze Age, late 2nd millennium to early-mid 1st millennium BC. We employed the chaîne opératoire technique to establish reliable links between the industrial and funerary evidence, as represented by 489 finished beads and a vast quantity of production debris. The sites in question are chronologically-overlapping and separated by only five kilometres, but such ornaments are found across the region and it is of fundamental importance to provide a solid foundation to expand semi-precious stone ornament studies and unravel the complex networks of social interactions that led to their exchange.
ISSN:2352-2267
DOI:10.1016/j.ara.2020.100240