Assessing quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis

Purpose : The quality of life of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients was assessed using two MS specific quality of life measures (FAMS and SF-54) and a short generic measure (EuroQol) in order to make recommendations for routine assessment. Factors contributing to quality of life within this population...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Disability and rehabilitation Jg. 23; H. 14; S. 597 - 603
Hauptverfasser: Nicholl, C R, Lincoln, N B, Francis, V M, Stephan, T F
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: England Informa UK Ltd 20.09.2001
Taylor & Francis
Schlagworte:
Activities of Daily Living
Adaptation, Psychological
Adult
Aged
Disability Evaluation
Female
Health Surveys
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple Sclerosis - diagnosis
Multiple Sclerosis - rehabilitation
Prognosis
Quality of Life
Sensitivity and Specificity
Severity of Illness Index
Sick Role
Surveys and Questionnaires
ISSN:0963-8288, 1464-5165
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose : The quality of life of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients was assessed using two MS specific quality of life measures (FAMS and SF-54) and a short generic measure (EuroQol) in order to make recommendations for routine assessment. Factors contributing to quality of life within this population were also considered. Method : Questionnaires were either sent by post or completed at interview. Ninety-six MS patients known to a consultant in rehabilitation medicine completed the questionnaires. Results : Patients scored very low on subscales related to physical health. Correlations were high between the FAMS and SF-54 but low with the EuroQoL. Stepwise multiple linear regressions showed mood measures to account for the most variance on all quality of life composite scores. The MS patients within the study had much lower SF-36 quality of life scores than the general population and other illness groups. Conclusions : The EuroQol did not measure the same aspects of quality of life as the FAMS and SF-54 and was not found to be a sensitive measure within this sample. The SF-54 suffered from floor effects on physical health subscales and therefore the FAMS was recommended.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0963-8288
1464-5165
DOI:10.1080/09638280110043933