Dataflow computing models, languages, and machines for intelligence computations

The authors compare dataflow computing models, languages, and dataflow computing machines for numerical and nonnumerical computations. The high-level-language-graph transformations that must be performed to achieve high performance for numerical and nonnumerical programs executed in a dataflow compu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering Vol. 14; no. 12; pp. 1805 - 1828
Main Authors: Herath, J., Yamaguchi, Y., Saito, N., Yuba, T.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY IEEE 01.12.1988
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
IEEE Computer Society
Subjects:
Algorithm design and analysis
Algorithms
Applied sciences
Computational modeling
Computer languages
Computer peripherals
Computer science education
Computer science; control theory; systems
Computer systems and distributed systems. User interface
Computers
Concurrent computing
Evaluation
Exact sciences and technology
Hardware
Intelligent
Logic programming
Machine intelligence
Machines
Parallel algorithms
Parallel processing
Performance evaluation
Physics computing
Processor scheduling
Programming languages
Software
Software engineering
Experimental result
Parallel programming
Programming language
Parallel calculus
Performance analysis
Computer system
Functional programming
Modeling
Data flow
ISSN:0098-5589, 1939-3520
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The authors compare dataflow computing models, languages, and dataflow computing machines for numerical and nonnumerical computations. The high-level-language-graph transformations that must be performed to achieve high performance for numerical and nonnumerical programs executed in a dataflow computing environment are described for Lisp, using the DCBL transformations. Some general problems of dataflow computing machines are discussed. Performance evaluation measurements obtained by executing benchmark programs in the ETL nonnumerical dataflow computing environment, the EM-3, are presented.< >
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0098-5589
1939-3520
DOI:10.1109/32.9065