A mixed‐methods, randomized controlled feasibility trial of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) plus Standard Care (SC) versus SC alone for DSM‐5 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in adults with intellectual disabilities

Objective To report the results of the first randomized feasibility trial of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) plus Standard Care (SC) versus SC alone for DSM‐5 posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults with intellectual disabilities. Method A total of 29 participants were ra...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:

Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:	Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities Ročník 32; číslo 4; s. 806 - 818
Hlavní autoři:	Karatzias, Thanos, Brown, Michael, Taggart, Laurence, Truesdale, Maria, Sirisena, Chammy, Walley, Robert, Mason‐Roberts, Susan, Bradley, Aoife, Paterson, Douglas
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	angličtina
Vydáno:	England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.07.2019
Témata:	Adult Clinical trials Desensitization Desensitization (Psychology) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Evidence-based medicine eye movement desensitization and reprocessing Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing - methods Eye movements Feasibility Studies Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Intellectual disabilities Intellectual Disability Male Middle Aged Mixed methods research Motor Reactions Outcome Assessment, Health Care Post traumatic stress disorder Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Psychotherapy Qualitative Research randomized feasibility study Single-Blind Method Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - therapy United Kingdom > UK randomized feasibility study eye movement desensitization and reprocessing intellectual disability posttraumatic stress disorder
ISSN:	1360-2322, 1468-3148, 1468-3148
On-line přístup:	Získat plný text
Tagy:	Přidat tag Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

Popis
Shrnutí:	Objective To report the results of the first randomized feasibility trial of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) plus Standard Care (SC) versus SC alone for DSM‐5 posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults with intellectual disabilities. Method A total of 29 participants were randomized to either to EMDR + SC (n = 15) or SC (n = 14). Participants completed measures on traumatic stress (PCL‐C) and comorbid distress at baseline, 1 week post‐treatment and 3‐month follow‐up. Results In the EMDR + SC group, 9 (60%) participants at post‐treatment and 7 (47%) participants at 3‐month follow‐up were diagnosis free. In SC, 4 (27%) at post‐treatment and follow‐up were diagnosis free. At post‐treatment, three participants (20%) dropped out from the EMDR + SC group, and 1 (7%) dropped out from the SC group. Conclusions It is feasible, acceptable and potentially effective to deliver EMDR in this population group.
Bibliografie:	ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:	1360-2322 1468-3148 1468-3148
DOI:	10.1111/jar.12570