Automated algorithm aided capacity and confidence boost in surgical decision-making training for inferior clivus

To assess the impact of automated algorithms on the trainees' decision-making capacity and confidence for individualized surgical planning. At Chinese PLA General Hospital, trainees were enrolled to undergo decision-making capacity and confidence training through three alternative visual tasks...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Frontiers in surgery Ročník 11; s. 1375861
Hlavní autoři: Tang, Ke, Bu, Bo, Tian, Hongcheng, Li, Yang, Jiang, Xingwang, Qian, Zenghui, Zhou, Yiqiang
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 18.04.2024
Témata:
automated decision-making
confidence
high-risk
risk-benefit assessment
Surgery
surgical planning
surgical simulation
automated decision-making
surgical planning
high-risk
risk-benefit assessment
surgical simulation
confidence
ISSN:2296-875X, 2296-875X
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:To assess the impact of automated algorithms on the trainees' decision-making capacity and confidence for individualized surgical planning. At Chinese PLA General Hospital, trainees were enrolled to undergo decision-making capacity and confidence training through three alternative visual tasks of the inferior clivus model formed from an automated algorithm and given consecutively in three exemplars. The rationale of automated decision-making was used to instruct each trainee. Following automated decision-making calculation in 50 skull base models, we screened out three optimal plans, infra-tubercle approach (ITA), trans-tubercle approach (TTA), and supra-tubercle approach (STA) for 41 (82.00%), 8 (16.00%), and 1 (2.00%) subject, respectively. From September 1, 2023, through November 17, 2023, 62 trainees (median age [range]: 27 [26-28]; 28 [45.16%] female; 25 [40.32%] neurosurgeons) made a decision among the three plans for the three typical models (ITA, TTA, and STA exemplars). The confidence ratings had fine test-retest reliability (Spearman's rho: 0.979; 95% CI: 0.970 to 0.988) and criterion validity with time spent (Spearman's rho: -0.954; 95%CI: -0.963 to -0.945). Following instruction of automated decision-making, time spent (initial test: 24.02 vs. 7.13 in ITA; 30.24 vs. 7.06 in TTA; 34.21 vs. 12.82 in STA) and total hits (initial test: 30 vs. 16 in ITA; 37 vs. 17 in TTA; 42 vs. 28 in STA) reduced significantly; confidence ratings (initial test: 2 vs. 4 in ITA; 2 vs. 4 in TTA; 1 vs. 3 in STA) increased correspondingly. Statistically significant differences (  < 0.05) were observed for the above comparisons. The education tool generated by automated decision-making considers surgical freedom and injury risk for the individualized risk-benefit assessment, which may provide explicit information to increase trainees' decision-making capacity and confidence.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Cesare Zoia, San Matteo Hospital Foundation (IRCCS), Italy
Reviewed by: Ciro Mastantuoni, Ospedale Santa Maria delle Grazie, Italy
Alessandro Tel, University of Udine, Italy
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
ISSN:2296-875X
2296-875X
DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1375861