Sex‐Associated Disparities in Surgical and Percutaneous Management of Aortic Stenosis With Severe Features: Retrospective Analysis From the National Readmission Database
Referral for valve intervention for severe aortic stenosis (AS) may exhibit sex-associated disparities independent of the growth of transcatheter interventions. This study aimed to determine whether there were sex-associated differences in the use of aortic valve replacement (AVR), either surgical o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Heart Association Jg. 14; H. 10; S. e038463 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
England
John Wiley and Sons Inc
20.05.2025
Wiley |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 2047-9980, 2047-9980 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | Referral for valve intervention for severe aortic stenosis (AS) may exhibit sex-associated disparities independent of the growth of transcatheter interventions. This study aimed to determine whether there were sex-associated differences in the use of aortic valve replacement (AVR), either surgical or transcatheter, in patients with aortic stenosis and severe features from a national cohort of patients.
Using the National Readmission Database, all patients with an index diagnosis of AS between January 2015 and December 2019 were included and stratified by their 90-day readmission status and sex. AS with severe features was defined as the combination of primary- or secondary-coded diagnosis of AS in combination with heart failure, syncope, angina pectoris, cardiac arrest, or cardiogenic shock. A 1:1 nested case-control matching was performed to account for competing risk. The main investigated outcome was the sex-associated rate of AVR in the 90 days after index hospitalization.
A total of 31 712 matched weighted discharges were included in the analysis, 16 597 men (52.3%) and 15 116 women (47.7%). At 90 days, the rate of AVR was significantly lower in women (45.7% versus 53.6%,
<0.001) with significant difference for both surgical (
<0.001) and transcatheter (
=0.010) interventions. After multivariable adjustment, these differences persisted with women significantly less likely to receive AVR (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.63-0.71],
<0.001), either surgical AVR (aOR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.43-0.54],
<0.001) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (aOR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.75-0.84],
<0.001).
The use of surgical AVR and transcatheter aortic valve implantation was significantly lower in female patients with AS and severe features independent from patient- and hospital-level characteristics. |
|---|---|
| Bibliographie: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Supplemental Material is available at https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1161/JAHA.124.038463 This article was sent to Amgad Mentias, MD, Associate Editor, for review by expert referees, editorial decision, and final disposition. For Disclosures and Sources of Fundings, see page 15. |
| ISSN: | 2047-9980 2047-9980 |
| DOI: | 10.1161/JAHA.124.038463 |