The Chang Gung Research Database—A multi‐institutional electronic medical records database for real‐world epidemiological studies in Taiwan

Purpose The Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD), the largest multi‐institutional electronic medical records (EMR) collection in Taiwan, provides good access for researchers to efficiently use the standardized patient‐level data. This study evaluates the capacity and representativeness of the CGRD to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety Jg. 28; H. 5; S. 593 - 600
Hauptverfasser: Shao, Shih‐Chieh, Chan, Yuk‐Ying, Kao Yang, Yea‐Huei, Lin, Swu‐Jane, Hung, Ming‐Jui, Chien, Rong‐Nan, Lai, Chi‐Chun, Lai, Edward Chia‐Cheng
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.05.2019
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1053-8569, 1099-1557, 1099-1557
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose The Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD), the largest multi‐institutional electronic medical records (EMR) collection in Taiwan, provides good access for researchers to efficiently use the standardized patient‐level data. This study evaluates the capacity and representativeness of the CGRD to promote secondary use of EMR data for clinical research with more accurate estimates. Methods The National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) which covers over 99.9% of the Taiwanese population served as the comparator in this study. We compare the data components of the CGRD with the NHIRD, including records for health care facilities, patients, diagnoses, drugs, and procedures. Using the chi‐square test, we compared the distributions of age categories and sex of patients, and the rates of their health conditions between NHIRD and CGRD based on the year 2015. Results The CGRD contains more clinical information such as pathological and laboratory results than the NHIRD. The CGRD includes 6.1% of outpatients and 10.2% of hospitalized patients from the NHIRD. We found the CGRD includes more elderly outpatients (23.5% vs 12.5%) and pediatric inpatients (19.7% vs 14.4%) compared with the NHIRD. We found patients' sex distributions were similar between CGRD and NHIRD, but coverage rates of severe conditions, such as cancer, were higher than other health conditions in CGRD. Conclusions The CGRD could serve as the basis for accurate estimates in medical studies. However, researchers should pay special attention to selection biases since patients' characteristics from CGRD differ from those of the national database.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1053-8569
1099-1557
1099-1557
DOI:10.1002/pds.4713