Benchmarking of Navier–Stokes codes for free surface simulations by means of a solitary wave

The paper presents a benchmark of four freely available solvers for Navier–Stokes equations: Gerris, OpenFOAM, Thétis and Truchas. These models are selected because they have been reported to deal successfully with oceanographic and coastal engineering applications. The benchmark includes two free s...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Coastal engineering (Amsterdam) Ročník 91; s. 1 - 17
Hlavní autoři: Wroniszewski, Paweł A., Verschaeve, Joris C.G., Pedersen, Geir K.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Kidlington Elsevier B.V 01.09.2014
Elsevier
Témata:
Beaches
Benchmark
Benchmarking
Boundaries
Coastal oceanography, estuaries. Regional oceanography
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Navier-Stokes equations
Navier–Stokes
Physics of the oceans
Solitary wave
Solitary waves
Solvers
Two-phase flow
Volume-of-fluid
Wave runup
Solitary wave
Benchmark
Navier–Stokes
Wave runup
Two-phase flow
Volume-of-fluid
Littoral zone
Navier―Stokes
Two phase flow
Benchmarking
Finite volume method
Wave breaking
beaches
Wave propagation
Navier Stokes equation
Free surface flow
Runup
ISSN:0378-3839, 1872-7379
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:The paper presents a benchmark of four freely available solvers for Navier–Stokes equations: Gerris, OpenFOAM, Thétis and Truchas. These models are selected because they have been reported to deal successfully with oceanographic and coastal engineering applications. The benchmark includes two free surface problems: propagation of a solitary wave and runup of a solitary wave on a plane beach. The fluids are inviscid, which allows a detailed study of energy conservation and comparison of the results with a reference solution given by a boundary integral solver. The Navier–Stokes solvers use the finite volume discretization and free surface capturing techniques based on the volume-of-fluid (VOF) method. In the first benchmark test, we investigate the influence of numerical dissipation and other spurious effects on the energy balance of the wave. In the second problem, we focus on the runup heights and compare them with the reference solution. The beach in the runup problem is represented with a solid body immersed in the Cartesian mesh. The solid boundaries are described with a VOF type approach or a staircase representation, depending on the features of the solver. In addition to the immersed boundary description a couple of body fitted meshes are tested for the runup case. •We benchmarked four Navier–Stokes solvers for free surface simulations•The results are compared with a reference solution•Spurious effects can lead to growth of energy•Geometric advection of volume fraction is less robust then solving transport equation
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0378-3839
1872-7379
DOI:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.04.012