Development and Validation of the Five-Factor Borderline Inventory–Super Short Form and Screener

The Five-Factor Borderline Inventory (FFBI) and FFBI-Short Form (FFBI-SF) are 120-item and 48-item measures that assess the underlying maladaptive personality traits of borderline personality disorder (BPD). The purpose of this study was to develop a super short form (FFBI-SSF) and an FFBI-Screener...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Assessment (Odessa, Fla.) Vol. 32; no. 4; pp. 488 - 500
Main Authors: DeShong, Hilary L., Mason, Courtney K., Porter, Ben, Kelley, Kren, Mullins-Sweatt, Stephanie N., Lynam, Donald R., Miller, Joshua D., Widiger, Thomas
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.06.2025
Subjects:
ISSN:1073-1911, 1552-3489, 1552-3489
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Five-Factor Borderline Inventory (FFBI) and FFBI-Short Form (FFBI-SF) are 120-item and 48-item measures that assess the underlying maladaptive personality traits of borderline personality disorder (BPD). The purpose of this study was to develop a super short form (FFBI-SSF) and an FFBI-Screener to facilitate the use of dimensional trait measures for BPD. Using item response theory analyses, the 48-item measure was reduced to 22 items using a large undergraduate sample (N = 1300) and then retested using a Mechanical Turk sample (N = 602), demonstrating strong replicability. IRT was again used to further reduce the measure from 22 items to four items to provide a brief screening tool. Correlations of the FFBI-SSF and Screener with measures of BPD-related variables were compared across five samples (N = 919, 204, 580, 281, and 488). Overall, the FFBI-SSF showed similar relations to the FFBI-SF at the full scale and domain-level scales, while the FFBI-screener demonstrated similar relations at the full scale level. This super short form and screener may best be used in large-scale research studies or as part of a screening tool in clinical settings.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1073-1911
1552-3489
1552-3489
DOI:10.1177/10731911241256439