Clinical and radiological results of final fusion in patients who underwent lengthening with magnetically controlled growing rods. About 66 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up. Methods This was a multicentre study in 10 Frenc...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:

Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:	European spine journal Ročník 32; číslo 9; s. 3118 - 3132
Hlavní autoři:	Mainard, Nicolas, Saghbini, Elie, Langlais, Tristan, Vialle, Raphael, Nectoux, Eric, Sales de Gauzy, Jerome, Fron, Damien, Canavese, Federico
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	angličtina
Vydáno:	Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.09.2023 Springer Nature B.V Springer Verlag
Edice:	European Spine Journal
Témata:	Arthrodesis Back surgery Complications Etiology Hospitals Life Sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neurosurgery Original Article Orthopedics Patients Pediatrics Postoperative Scoliosis Surgical Orthopedics Early onset scoliosis Spinal growth Magnetically controlled growing rod Graduate Posterior spinal fusion
ISSN:	0940-6719, 1432-0932, 1432-0932
On-line přístup:	Získat plný text
Tagy:	Přidat tag Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

Abstract	Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up. Methods This was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included. Results A total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7 years (range: 2.1–9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18 months (range: 3–68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5 years (range: 9.5–17). The main and secondary curves were significantly ( p < 0.005 and p = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4 mm and 14 mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference ( p = 0.096 and p = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up. After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery. Conclusion Final fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications. Level of evidence Level 4.
AbstractList	The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up.PURPOSEThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up.This was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included.METHODSThis was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included.A total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7 years (range: 2.1-9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18 months (range: 3-68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5 years (range: 9.5-17). The main and secondary curves were significantly (p < 0.005 and p = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4 mm and 14 mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference (p = 0.096 and p = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up. After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery.RESULTSA total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7 years (range: 2.1-9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18 months (range: 3-68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5 years (range: 9.5-17). The main and secondary curves were significantly (p < 0.005 and p = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4 mm and 14 mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference (p = 0.096 and p = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up. After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery.Final fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications.CONCLUSIONFinal fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications.Level 4.LEVEL OF EVIDENCELevel 4. PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up.MethodsThis was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included.ResultsA total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7 years (range: 2.1–9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18 months (range: 3–68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5 years (range: 9.5–17). The main and secondary curves were significantly (p < 0.005 and p = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4 mm and 14 mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference (p = 0.096 and p = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up.After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery. ConclusionFinal fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications.Level of evidence Level 4. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up. This was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included. A total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7 years (range: 2.1-9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18 months (range: 3-68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5 years (range: 9.5-17). The main and secondary curves were significantly (p < 0.005 and p = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4 mm and 14 mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference (p = 0.096 and p = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up. After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery. Final fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications. Level 4. Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up. Methods This was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included. Results A total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7 years (range: 2.1–9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18 months (range: 3–68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5 years (range: 9.5–17). The main and secondary curves were significantly ( p < 0.005 and p = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4 mm and 14 mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference ( p = 0.096 and p = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up. After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery. Conclusion Final fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications. Level of evidence Level 4. PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up.MethodsThis was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included.ResultsA total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7 years (range: 2.1–9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18 months (range: 3–68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5 years (range: 9.5–17). The main and secondary curves were significantly (p < 0.005 and p = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4 mm and 14 mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference (p = 0.096 and p = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up.After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery.ConclusionFinal fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications.Level of evidenceLevel 4.
Author	Nectoux, Eric Sales de Gauzy, Jerome Vialle, Raphael Canavese, Federico Mainard, Nicolas Fron, Damien Langlais, Tristan Saghbini, Elie
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Nicolas orcidid: 0000-0001-6403-2448 surname: Mainard fullname: Mainard, Nicolas email: nicolas.mainard@orange.fr organization: Department of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU Lille, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital – sequence: 2 givenname: Elie surname: Saghbini fullname: Saghbini, Elie organization: Orthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery in Children, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau - AP-HP – sequence: 3 givenname: Tristan surname: Langlais fullname: Langlais, Tristan organization: Paediatrics - Orthopaedic, Traumatological and Plastic Surgery, Children’s Hospital – sequence: 4 givenname: Raphael surname: Vialle fullname: Vialle, Raphael organization: Orthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery in Children, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau - AP-HP – sequence: 5 givenname: Eric surname: Nectoux fullname: Nectoux, Eric organization: Department of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU Lille, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lille Henri Warembourg, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital – sequence: 6 givenname: Jerome surname: Sales de Gauzy fullname: Sales de Gauzy, Jerome organization: Paediatrics - Orthopaedic, Traumatological and Plastic Surgery, Children’s Hospital – sequence: 7 givenname: Damien surname: Fron fullname: Fron, Damien organization: Department of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU Lille, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital – sequence: 8 givenname: Federico surname: Canavese fullname: Canavese, Federico organization: Department of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU Lille, Paediatrics - Orthopaedic, Traumatological and Plastic Surgery, Children’s Hospital
BackLink	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37382696$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-04536354$$DView record in HAL
BookMark	eNp9ks9u1DAQxi1URLeFF-CALHGBQ4r_xUmOqxVQpJW4wNmaTSZZV157sRO2fZs-BQ_Ak-F0W0A99GR5_Ps-j76ZM3Lig0dCXnN2wRmrPiTGyloXTMiCVbVUxfUzsuBKioI1UpyQBWsUK3TFm1NyltIVY7xsmH5BTmUla6EbvSC_Vs5624Kj4DsaobPBheGuEDFNbkw09LS3Phf6KdngqfV0D6NFn98O20An32E85Ct16Idxi976gR7suKU7GDyOs5u7oW3wYwzOYUeHGA4zFEOXLuhyE6aRav2f7SwGukPwtM-ScCim_dxI-fv2BiGml-R5Dy7hq_vznHz_9PHb6rJYf_38ZbVcF61izViohrW6rDea53h6aEqpNhvomaqhqUGrCrFHhYBca647JTiWggmEkgPnSshz8v7ouwVn9tHuIN6YANZcLtdmrjFVSi1L9ZNn9t2R3cfwY8I0mp1NLToHHsOUjKglF01V69n27SP0KkwxZzxTWugyz6nO1Jt7atrssPv7_8P0MlAfgTaGlCL2prVjznAOGqwznJl5UcxxUUxeFHO3KOY6S8Uj6YP7kyJ5FKUM-wHjv7afUP0Bi2TTIg
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_024_06121_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_otsr_2024_104012 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43390_025_01139_3
Cites_doi	10.1097/BRS.0000000000004044 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003048 10.1007/s11420-019-09671-5 10.31616/asj.2018.0272 10.1007/s43390-020-00077-6 10.1302/0301-620X.99B12.BJJ-2017-0402.R2 10.52312/jdrs.2021.49 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001646 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001561 10.1007/s00586-018-5590-4 10.2106/JBJS.15.01334 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.10.005 10.2106/JBJS.L.01386 10.1177/21925682221090926 10.1007/s43390-020-00255-6 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.09.050 10.1007/s00402-020-03518-z 10.1177/2192568220948475 10.1302/0301-620X.104B2.BJJ-2021-1198.R1 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182773560 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318240ff67 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.08.007 10.1007/s00586-021-06968-0 10.1093/neuros/nyy270 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002297 10.2106/JBJS.17.00031 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003439 10.1007/s40258-014-0127-4 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000446 10.1007/s00586-021-06750-2 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318214d78f 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003148 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8b4e 10.2106/JBJS.15.01241 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-1102.R2 10.1007/s00586-016-4929-y 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000597 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e21b50 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.046
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. licence_http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero
Copyright_xml	– notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. – notice: 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. – notice: licence_http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero
DBID	AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7QP 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA BENPR CCPQU FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 1XC
DOI	10.1007/s00586-023-07834-x
DatabaseName	CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef PubMed ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList	MEDLINE - Academic ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) PubMed
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Medicine
EISSN	1432-0932
EndPage	3132
ExternalDocumentID	oai:HAL:hal-04536354v1 37382696 10_1007_s00586_023_07834_x
Genre	Journal Article
GroupedDBID	--- -53 -5E -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .86 .VR 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 1N0 1SB 2.D 203 28- 29G 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2WC 2~H 30V 36B 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 53G 5GY 5QI 5VS 67Z 6NX 6PF 7X7 88E 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANXM AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAWTL AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIPD ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABPLI ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABUWZ ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACBXY ACDTI ACGFS ACHSB ACHVE ACHXU ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACPRK ACSNA ACUDM ACZOJ ADBBV ADHHG ADHIR ADIMF ADINQ ADJJI ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEFIE AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFEXP AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGDS AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHIZS AHKAY AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG AOIJS ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AZFZN B-. BA0 BAWUL BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGNMA BPHCQ BSONS BVXVI CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DIK DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DU5 E3Z EBD EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD EMB EMOBN EN4 ESBYG F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GRRUI GX1 GXS H13 HF~ HG5 HG6 HMCUK HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HYE HZ~ I09 IHE IJ- IKXTQ IMOTQ ITM IWAJR IXC IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ KDC KOV KOW KPH LAS LLZTM M1P M4Y MA- N2Q N9A NB0 NDZJH NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM OK1 P19 P2P P9S PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PT4 PT5 Q2X QOK QOR QOS R4E R89 R9I RHV RIG RNI ROL RPM RPX RRX RSV RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S37 S3B SAP SCLPG SDE SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJYHP SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SV3 SZ9 SZN T13 T16 TR2 TSG TSK TSV TT1 TUC U2A U9L UG4 UKHRP UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WJK WK8 YLTOR Z45 Z7U Z7X Z82 Z83 Z87 Z8O Z8V Z8W Z91 Z92 ZMTXR ZOVNA ~EX AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ABRTQ ACSTC ADHKG AEZWR AFDZB AFFHD AFHIU AFOHR AGQPQ AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY NPM 7QP 7XB 8FK K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI 7X8 PUEGO 1XC
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-490c658b61834fa9534bbaf048a98a647eefe4eae16616d421e5202ea51a11423
IEDL.DBID	7X7
ISICitedReferencesCount	3
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001017765400001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	0940-6719 1432-0932
IngestDate	Fri Nov 21 06:30:58 EST 2025 Thu Oct 02 11:47:17 EDT 2025 Tue Dec 02 16:03:00 EST 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:22:59 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 04:14:30 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:44:12 EST 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:41:51 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	9
Keywords	Early onset scoliosis Spinal growth Magnetically controlled growing rod Graduate Posterior spinal fusion
Language	English
License	2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. licence_http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero
LinkModel	DirectLink
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c409t-490c658b61834fa9534bbaf048a98a647eefe4eae16616d421e5202ea51a11423
Notes	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23
ORCID	0000-0001-6403-2448
PMID	37382696
PQID	2862655908
PQPubID	31317
PageCount	15
ParticipantIDs	hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04536354v1 proquest_miscellaneous_2831297862 proquest_journals_2862655908 pubmed_primary_37382696 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s00586_023_07834_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_023_07834_x springer_journals_10_1007_s00586_023_07834_x
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2023-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2023-09-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 09 year: 2023 text: 2023-09-01 day: 01
PublicationDecade	2020
PublicationPlace	Berlin/Heidelberg
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Berlin/Heidelberg – name: Germany – name: Heidelberg
PublicationSeriesTitle	European Spine Journal
PublicationTitle	European spine journal
PublicationTitleAbbrev	Eur Spine J
PublicationTitleAlternate	Eur Spine J
PublicationYear	2023
Publisher	Springer Berlin Heidelberg Springer Nature B.V Springer Verlag
Publisher_xml	– name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg – name: Springer Nature B.V – name: Springer Verlag
References	Cheung, Samartzis, Cheung (CR5) 2014; 14 Murphy, Emans, Troy, Miller, Hresko, Karlin (CR33) 2018; 27 Kwan, Alanay, Yazici, Demirkiran, Helenius, Nnadi (CR24) 2017; 42 Akbarnia, Cheung, Noordeen, Elsebaie, Yazici, Dannawi (CR3) 2013; 38 Akbarnia, Pawelek, Cheung, Demirkiran, Elsebaie, Emans (CR4) 2014; 2 Cheung, Yiu, Kwan, Cheung (CR14) 2019; 84 Akbarnia, Mundis, Salari, Yaszay, Pawelek (CR2) 2012; 37 Kılıçaslan, Tokgöz, Bütün, Nabi, Akalın (CR16) 2021; 32 Sawyer, de Mendonça, Flynn, Samdani, El-Hawary, Spurway (CR29) 2016; 4 Lebel, Rocos, Helenius, Sigal, Struder, Yazici (CR18) 2021; 46 Hanna, Sharafinski, Patterson, Noonan, Sund, Schultz (CR7) 2020; 8 Thakar, Kieser, Mardare, Haleem, Fairbank, Nnadi (CR22) 2018; 27 Sankar, Skaggs, Yazici, Johnston, Shah, Javidan (CR38) 2011; 36 Cheung, Bow, Cheung (CR39) 2022; 12 Hosseini, Pawelek, Mundis, Yaszay, Ferguson, Helenius (CR21) 2016; 41 Hardesty, Murphy, Pawelek, Glotzbecker, Hosseini, Johnston (CR12) 2021; 9 Flynn, Tomlinson, Pawelek, Thompson, McCarthy, Akbarnia (CR6) 2013; 95 Rushton, Siddique, Crawford, Birch, Gibson, Hutton (CR25) 2017; 99-B La Rosa, Oggiano, Ruzzini (CR20) 2017; 37 Joyce, Smith, Kandemir, Rushton, Fender, Bowey (CR27) 2020; 45 Rushton, Smith, Fender, Bowey, Gibson, Joyce (CR28) 2021; 30 Jain, Sponseller, Flynn, Shah, Thompson, Emans (CR8) 2016; 98 Bouthors, Gaume, Glorion, Miladi (CR30) 2019; 44 Lampe, Schulze Bövingloh, Gosheger, Schulte, Lange (CR15) 2019; 44 Kocyigit, Olgun, Demirkiran, Ayvaz, Yazici (CR36) 2017; 99 Lebon, Batailler, Wargny, Choufani, Violas, Fron (CR17) 2017; 26 Obid, Yiu, Cheung, Kwan, Ruf, Cheung (CR19) 2021; 141 Jenks, Craig, Higgins, Willits, Barata, Wood (CR1) 2014; 12 Poe-Kochert, Shannon, Pawelek, Thompson, Hardesty, Marks (CR34) 2016; 98 Ahmad, Subramanian, Panteliadis, Wilson-Macdonald, Rothenfluh, Nnadi (CR37) 2017; 99-B Wu, Cheung, Cheung, Lin, Jin, Chen (CR23) 2019; 13 Cahill, Marvil, Cuddihy, Schutt, Idema, Clements (CR11) 2010; 35 Akbarnia, Breakwell, Marks, McCarthy, Thompson, Canale (CR31) 2008; 33 Cobanoglu, Yorgova, Neiss, Pawelek, Thompson, Skaggs (CR9) 2021; 30 Pizones, Martín-Buitrago, Sánchez Márquez, Fernández-Baíllo, Baldan-Martin, Sánchez Pérez-Grueso (CR10) 2018; 6 Tahir, Mehta, Sandhu, Jones, Gardner, Mehta (CR13) 2022; 104-B Ahuja, Ifthekar, Mittal, Bali, Yadav, Goyal (CR26) 2022 Murphy, Barfield, Emans, Akbarnia, Thompson, Sponseller (CR32) 2020; 40 Shen, Schairer, Widmann (CR35) 2019; 15 IA Kocyigit (7834_CR36) 2017; 99 G La Rosa (7834_CR20) 2017; 37 P Hosseini (7834_CR21) 2016; 41 M Cobanoglu (7834_CR9) 2021; 30 BA Akbarnia (7834_CR3) 2013; 38 M Jenks (7834_CR1) 2014; 12 WN Sankar (7834_CR38) 2011; 36 JP-Y Cheung (7834_CR5) 2014; 14 C Poe-Kochert (7834_CR34) 2016; 98 JPY Cheung (7834_CR14) 2019; 84 TS Shen (7834_CR35) 2019; 15 RF Murphy (7834_CR33) 2018; 27 C Bouthors (7834_CR30) 2019; 44 PRP Rushton (7834_CR25) 2017; 99-B BA Akbarnia (7834_CR2) 2012; 37 BA Akbarnia (7834_CR4) 2014; 2 J Lebon (7834_CR17) 2017; 26 TJ Joyce (7834_CR27) 2020; 45 RF Murphy (7834_CR32) 2020; 40 P Obid (7834_CR19) 2021; 141 LP Lampe (7834_CR15) 2019; 44 ÖF Kılıçaslan (7834_CR16) 2021; 32 A-M Wu (7834_CR23) 2019; 13 CK Hardesty (7834_CR12) 2021; 9 K Ahuja (7834_CR26) 2022 JM Flynn (7834_CR6) 2013; 95 R Hanna (7834_CR7) 2020; 8 C Thakar (7834_CR22) 2018; 27 A Ahmad (7834_CR37) 2017; 99-B BA Akbarnia (7834_CR31) 2008; 33 J Pizones (7834_CR10) 2018; 6 PJ Cahill (7834_CR11) 2010; 35 DE Lebel (7834_CR18) 2021; 46 M Tahir (7834_CR13) 2022; 104-B KYH Kwan (7834_CR24) 2017; 42 JR Sawyer (7834_CR29) 2016; 4 A Jain (7834_CR8) 2016; 98 JPY Cheung (7834_CR39) 2022; 12 PRP Rushton (7834_CR28) 2021; 30
References_xml	– volume: 46 start-page: E1105 year: 2021 end-page: 1112 ident: CR18 article-title: Magnetically controlled growing rods graduation: deformity control with high complication rate publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004044 – volume: 44 start-page: 1201 year: 2019 end-page: 1210 ident: CR15 article-title: Magnetically controlled growing rods in treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a single center study with a minimum of 2-year-follow up and preliminary results after converting surgery publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003048 – volume: 15 start-page: 201 year: 2019 end-page: 204 ident: CR35 article-title: In patients with early-onset scoliosis, can growing rods be removed without further instrumentation? an evidenced-based review publication-title: HSS J doi: 10.1007/s11420-019-09671-5 – volume: 13 start-page: 682 year: 2019 end-page: 693 ident: CR23 article-title: Minimum 2-year experience with magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a systematic review publication-title: Asian Spine J doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0272 – volume: 8 start-page: 547 year: 2020 end-page: 552 ident: CR7 article-title: Is prophylactic formal fusion with implant revision necessary in non-ambulatory children with spinal muscular atrophy and growing rods who are no longer lengthened? publication-title: Spine Deform doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00077-6 – volume: 99-B start-page: 1658 year: 2017 end-page: 1664 ident: CR37 article-title: Quantifying the law of diminishing returns in magnetically controlled growing rods publication-title: Bone Jt J. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B12.BJJ-2017-0402.R2 – volume: 32 start-page: 478 year: 2021 end-page: 488 ident: CR16 article-title: Management and results of early-onset scoliosis with dual magnetically controlled growing rods: additional preliminary results of spinal fusion surgery publication-title: Jt Dis Relat Surg. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2021.49 – volume: 40 start-page: e942 year: 2020 end-page: e946 ident: CR32 article-title: Minimum 5-year follow-up on graduates of growing spine surgery for early onset scoliosis publication-title: J Pediatr Orthop doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001646 – volume: 41 start-page: 1456 year: 2016 end-page: 1462 ident: CR21 article-title: Magnetically controlled growing rods for early-onset scoliosis: a multicenter study of 23 cases with minimum 2 years follow-up publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001561 – volume: 27 start-page: 2062 year: 2018 end-page: 2071 ident: CR22 article-title: Systematic review of the complications associated with magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early onset scoliosis publication-title: Eur Spine J doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5590-4 – volume: 98 start-page: 1913 year: 2016 end-page: 1917 ident: CR34 article-title: Final fusion after growing-rod treatment for early onset scoliosis: is it really final? publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01334 – volume: 6 start-page: 308 year: 2018 end-page: 313 ident: CR10 article-title: Decision making of graduation in patients with early-onset scoliosis at the end of distraction-based programs: risks and benefits of definitive fusion publication-title: Spine Deform doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.10.005 – volume: 95 start-page: 1745 year: 2013 end-page: 1750 ident: CR6 article-title: Growing-rod graduates: lessons learned from ninety-nine patients who completed lengthening publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01386 – year: 2022 ident: CR26 article-title: Is final fusion necessary for growing-rod graduates: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Glob Spine J doi: 10.1177/21925682221090926 – volume: 9 start-page: 679 year: 2021 end-page: 683 ident: CR12 article-title: An initial effort to define an early onset scoliosis graduate-the pediatric spine study group experience publication-title: Spine Deform doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00255-6 – volume: 2 start-page: 493 year: 2014 end-page: 497 ident: CR4 article-title: Traditional growing rods versus magnetically controlled growing rods for the surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a case-matched 2-year study publication-title: Spine Deform doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.09.050 – volume: 141 start-page: 1163 year: 2021 end-page: 1174 ident: CR19 article-title: Magnetically controlled growing rods in early onset scoliosis: radiological results, outcome, and complications in a series of 22 patients publication-title: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03518-z – volume: 12 start-page: 221 year: 2022 end-page: 228 ident: CR39 article-title: Law of temporary diminishing distraction gains: the phenomenon of temporary diminished distraction lengths with magnetically controlled growing rods that is reverted with rod exchange publication-title: Glob Spine J doi: 10.1177/2192568220948475 – volume: 104-B start-page: 264 issue: 257 year: 2022 ident: CR13 article-title: A comparison of the post-fusion outcome of patients with early-onset scoliosis treated with traditional and magnetically controlled growing rods publication-title: Bone Jt J doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B2.BJJ-2021-1198.R1 – volume: 38 start-page: 665 year: 2013 end-page: 670 ident: CR3 article-title: Next generation of growth-sparing techniques: preliminary clinical results of a magnetically controlled growing rod in 14 patients with early-onset scoliosis publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182773560 – volume: 37 start-page: 1109 year: 2012 end-page: 1114 ident: CR2 article-title: Innovation in growing rod technique: a study of safety and efficacy of a magnetically controlled growing rod in a porcine model publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318240ff67 – volume: 4 start-page: 407 year: 2016 end-page: 412 ident: CR29 article-title: Complications and radiographic outcomes of posterior spinal fusion and observation in patients who have undergone distraction-based treatment for early onset scoliosis publication-title: Spine Deform doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.08.007 – volume: 30 start-page: 3563 year: 2021 end-page: 3569 ident: CR9 article-title: Prevalence of junctional kyphosis in early-onset scoliosis: can it be corrected at final fusion? publication-title: Eur Spine J doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06968-0 – volume: 84 start-page: 1112 year: 2019 end-page: 1123 ident: CR14 article-title: Mean 6-year follow-up of magnetically controlled growing rod patients with early onset scoliosis: a glimpse of what happens to graduates publication-title: Neurosurgery doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy270 – volume: 42 start-page: E1410 year: 2017 end-page: 1414 ident: CR24 article-title: Unplanned reoperations in magnetically controlled growing rod surgery for early onset scoliosis with a minimum of two-year follow-up publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002297 – volume: 99 start-page: 1554 year: 2017 end-page: 1564 ident: CR36 article-title: Graduation protocol after growing-rod treatment: removal of implants without new instrumentation is not a realistic approach publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00031 – volume: 45 start-page: 872876 year: 2020 ident: CR27 article-title: The NuVasive MAGEC rod urgent field safety notice concerning locking pin fracture: how does data from an independent explant center compare? publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003439 – volume: 12 start-page: 599 issue: 587 year: 2014 ident: CR1 article-title: The MAGEC system for spinal lengthening in children with scoliosis: a NICE medical technology guidance publication-title: Appl Health Econ Health Policy doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0127-4 – volume: 27 start-page: 168 year: 2018 end-page: 175 ident: CR33 article-title: Sagittal plane parameters in growing rod patients following final fusion publication-title: J Pediatr Orthop B doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000446 – volume: 30 start-page: 1905 year: 2021 end-page: 1911 ident: CR28 article-title: Metallosis is commonly associated with magnetically controlled growing rods; results from an independent multicentre explant database publication-title: Eur Spine J doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06750-2 – volume: 36 start-page: 806 year: 2011 end-page: 809 ident: CR38 article-title: Lengthening of dual growing rods and the law of diminishing returns publication-title: Spine(Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318214d78f – volume: 44 start-page: 1630 year: 2019 end-page: 1637 ident: CR30 article-title: Outcomes at Skeletal maturity of 34 children with scoliosis treated with a traditional single growing rod publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003148 – volume: 33 start-page: 984 year: 2008 end-page: 990 ident: CR31 article-title: Dual growing rod technique followed for three to eleven years until final fusion: the effect of frequency of lengthening publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8b4e – volume: 98 start-page: 1073 year: 2016 end-page: 1078 ident: CR8 article-title: Avoidance of final surgical fusion after growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01241 – volume: 99-B start-page: 708 year: 2017 end-page: 713 ident: CR25 article-title: Magnetically controlled growing rods in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a note of caution publication-title: Bone Jt J doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-1102.R2 – volume: 26 start-page: 1567 year: 2017 end-page: 1576 ident: CR17 article-title: Magnetically controlled growing rod in early onset scoliosis: a 30-case multicenter study publication-title: Eur Spine J doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4929-y – volume: 37 start-page: 79 year: 2017 end-page: 85 ident: CR20 article-title: Magnetically controlled growing rods for the management of early-onset scoliosis: a preliminary report publication-title: J Pediatr Orthop doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000597 – volume: 35 start-page: E1199 year: 2010 end-page: 1203 ident: CR11 article-title: Autofusion in the immature spine treated with growing rods publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e21b50 – volume: 14 start-page: e7 year: 2014 end-page: 13 ident: CR5 article-title: A novel approach to gradual correction of severe spinal deformity in a pediatric patient using the magnetically-controlled growing rod publication-title: Spine J doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.046 – volume: 26 start-page: 1567 year: 2017 ident: 7834_CR17 publication-title: Eur Spine J doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4929-y – volume: 4 start-page: 407 year: 2016 ident: 7834_CR29 publication-title: Spine Deform doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.08.007 – volume: 2 start-page: 493 year: 2014 ident: 7834_CR4 publication-title: Spine Deform doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.09.050 – volume: 99-B start-page: 1658 year: 2017 ident: 7834_CR37 publication-title: Bone Jt J. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B12.BJJ-2017-0402.R2 – volume: 6 start-page: 308 year: 2018 ident: 7834_CR10 publication-title: Spine Deform doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.10.005 – volume: 104-B start-page: 264 issue: 257 year: 2022 ident: 7834_CR13 publication-title: Bone Jt J doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B2.BJJ-2021-1198.R1 – volume: 27 start-page: 168 year: 2018 ident: 7834_CR33 publication-title: J Pediatr Orthop B doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000446 – volume: 12 start-page: 221 year: 2022 ident: 7834_CR39 publication-title: Glob Spine J doi: 10.1177/2192568220948475 – volume: 30 start-page: 3563 year: 2021 ident: 7834_CR9 publication-title: Eur Spine J doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06968-0 – volume: 12 start-page: 599 issue: 587 year: 2014 ident: 7834_CR1 publication-title: Appl Health Econ Health Policy doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0127-4 – volume: 27 start-page: 2062 year: 2018 ident: 7834_CR22 publication-title: Eur Spine J doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5590-4 – volume: 30 start-page: 1905 year: 2021 ident: 7834_CR28 publication-title: Eur Spine J doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06750-2 – volume: 37 start-page: 79 year: 2017 ident: 7834_CR20 publication-title: J Pediatr Orthop doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000597 – volume: 95 start-page: 1745 year: 2013 ident: 7834_CR6 publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01386 – volume: 41 start-page: 1456 year: 2016 ident: 7834_CR21 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001561 – volume: 40 start-page: e942 year: 2020 ident: 7834_CR32 publication-title: J Pediatr Orthop doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001646 – volume: 42 start-page: E1410 year: 2017 ident: 7834_CR24 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002297 – volume: 13 start-page: 682 year: 2019 ident: 7834_CR23 publication-title: Asian Spine J doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0272 – volume: 9 start-page: 679 year: 2021 ident: 7834_CR12 publication-title: Spine Deform doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00255-6 – volume: 99-B start-page: 708 year: 2017 ident: 7834_CR25 publication-title: Bone Jt J doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-1102.R2 – volume: 14 start-page: e7 year: 2014 ident: 7834_CR5 publication-title: Spine J doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.046 – volume: 44 start-page: 1201 year: 2019 ident: 7834_CR15 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003048 – volume: 141 start-page: 1163 year: 2021 ident: 7834_CR19 publication-title: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03518-z – volume: 38 start-page: 665 year: 2013 ident: 7834_CR3 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182773560 – volume: 44 start-page: 1630 year: 2019 ident: 7834_CR30 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003148 – volume: 46 start-page: E1105 year: 2021 ident: 7834_CR18 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004044 – volume: 35 start-page: E1199 year: 2010 ident: 7834_CR11 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e21b50 – volume: 36 start-page: 806 year: 2011 ident: 7834_CR38 publication-title: Spine(Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318214d78f – volume: 45 start-page: 872876 year: 2020 ident: 7834_CR27 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003439 – volume: 33 start-page: 984 year: 2008 ident: 7834_CR31 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8b4e – volume: 15 start-page: 201 year: 2019 ident: 7834_CR35 publication-title: HSS J doi: 10.1007/s11420-019-09671-5 – year: 2022 ident: 7834_CR26 publication-title: Glob Spine J doi: 10.1177/21925682221090926 – volume: 99 start-page: 1554 year: 2017 ident: 7834_CR36 publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00031 – volume: 98 start-page: 1913 year: 2016 ident: 7834_CR34 publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01334 – volume: 8 start-page: 547 year: 2020 ident: 7834_CR7 publication-title: Spine Deform doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00077-6 – volume: 98 start-page: 1073 year: 2016 ident: 7834_CR8 publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01241 – volume: 84 start-page: 1112 year: 2019 ident: 7834_CR14 publication-title: Neurosurgery doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy270 – volume: 37 start-page: 1109 year: 2012 ident: 7834_CR2 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318240ff67 – volume: 32 start-page: 478 year: 2021 ident: 7834_CR16 publication-title: Jt Dis Relat Surg. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2021.49
SSID	ssj0015906
Score	2.4164872
Snippet	Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as... The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as... PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as...
SourceID	hal proquest pubmed crossref springer
SourceType	Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher
StartPage	3118
SubjectTerms	Arthrodesis Back surgery Complications Etiology Hospitals Life Sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neurosurgery Original Article Orthopedics Patients Pediatrics Postoperative Scoliosis Surgical Orthopedics
SummonAdditionalLinks	– databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present dbid: RSV link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3bbtQwELWgIMRLy53QggbEG7jaJHayfqwqqj5Ahbipb9Eka7crpUm1Sbrt3_AVfABf1pmsE0AFJHjby9ix5PHMceZyhHgZmcI4cqsyV45LciIjTYpaTmIscjQ5M9X0ZBPpwcH08NC890VhzZDtPoQke0s9FrsxAx4nzMaSQ09KEnK8Qe5uyoQNHz5-GWMH2vSMmtwYTiZpaHypzO_n-MUdXT_mZMirSPNKlLR3Pnsb_7fsO2Ldg03YWWnHXXHNVvfErXc-nH5ffPNdQUvAagYLnM0HUwh0C-_KtoHagWPiLHAdv1eDeQW-FWsDy-MauAZtsaSvwJQs3EqBFgf8dhdO8KhalUiWF-BT4ks7gyO6-bMQme5mGzju1EKS_DQtD0Y4sViBoyH1UnanvBD9_esFHczmgfi89-bT7r70RA6yoOtjK5WZFIR08oTsh3JodKzyHB0ZDzRTTFRqrbPKog0JLSQzFYVWR5PIog6Ra33jh2Ktqiv7WEBRGDSojSbnrkL6gC6MrMoJpibapToQ4bCfWeG7nDPZRpmN_Zn7DcloQ7J-Q7LzQLwax5yuenz8VfoFqckoyO2593feZvwbweOYAJw6CwOxNWhR5o1Ck0V8e9RMMh-I5-PfdJw5RoOVrTuWiQmBpSQZiEcr7RsfxU2oosQkgXg9qNqPyf-84Cf_Jr4pbke9tnIe3ZZYaxedfSpuFmftvFk864_aJYNbJQo priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature
Title	Clinical and radiological results of final fusion in patients who underwent lengthening with magnetically controlled growing rods. About 66 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years
URI	https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00586-023-07834-x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37382696 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2862655908 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2831297862 https://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-04536354
Volume	32
WOSCitedRecordID	wos001017765400001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present customDbUrl: eissn: 1432-0932 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0015906 issn: 0940-6719 databaseCode: RSV dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22 providerName: Springer Nature
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELZoy4ELD_Fo2lINiBsYNomdrE-ooFY9oFVVHtpb5CR2u1KaLHl02x_G_2Mm66Sgil64rDa748Sr_Twz9jw-xt4EKlMWzSpPhaWSnEBxFWvJJ6HOUq1SYqrpySbi2Ww6n6sTd-DWuLTKQSf2ijqvMjoj_xCQ6y2Jofvj8icn1iiKrjoKjQ22RbTZhPN4Pm640FL33JrUIo5Hsa9c0UxfOkd8epR-G3IKZAl-9Zdh2jintMjbPueteGlvho4e_e8PeMweOgcUDtaIecLumfIp--XagxagyxxqnS8GnQi4He-KtoHKgiUGLbAdHbDBogTXk7WB1XkFVIxWr_ASiJuFeirg_IGOeeFCn5XrWsniGlxufGFyOKurFQmhDm_eAwWgWoiiP25LgzVcGF2CxSHVindLmoiEa1ygzTP2_ejw2-dj7ggdeIbbyJYLNcnQ40kj1CPCaiVDkabaohLRaqojERtjjTDa-Og1RLkIfCODSWC09DXV_IbP2WZZlWabQZYprbRUEo288PGNtn5gRIruaiRtLD3mD_9mkrlu50S6USRjn-YeAQkiIOkRkFx57O04Zrnu9XGn9GsEyShIbbqPD74k9Bm6ySE6cuLS99jeAIbEKYcmuUGCx16NX-OypliNLk3VkUyInliMkh57scbe-ChqRhVEKvLYuwGMNzf_94R37p7LLnsQ9MuB8uf22GZbd-Ylu59dtoum3u8XVv863Wdbnw5nJ6d4dfr1x29rWy1b
linkProvider	ProQuest
linkToHtml	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9NAEB61BQkuPMTLUGBAcIIt8Xptdw8IVUCVqiHiUKTezNrZbSOldrCTpvlT3Ph_zDi2C6rorQducTK7Wa2_nZnd2ZkP4JXUmXZkVkWqHKfkSC10bELRC0yWGp0yU01NNhEPh9uHh_rrGvxsc2H4WmWrE2tFPSoyPiN_J9n1Dpmh-8P0h2DWKI6uthQaK1js2-WCtmzV-71P9H5fS7n7-eBjXzSsAiKjvcxMKN3LyOymEYFZOaPDQKWpcYRko7dNpGJrnVXWWJ9MVzRS0reh7ElrQt9w4mlA_a7DNdLjMW_24sNug0eeQc3lySXpRBT7uknSqVP1mL-Pr_sGggNnSpz9ZQjXj_ka5kUf90J8tjZ7u7f_twm7A7caBxt3ViviLqzZ_B78asqfTtDkIyzNaNzqfCxtNZ_MKiwcOmYIQzfnA0Qc59jUnK1wcVwgJ9uVC3pE5p7hmhE0X8jH2HhijvJVLuhkic3d_4kd4VFZLFiIbFS1hRxgm2EU_dEtNzZ4Yk2OjpoUCzGf8kBCXNLEVffh25XM1APYyIvcPgLMMm20CXVITozy6YNxvrQqJXc8Cl0ceuC36Emyppo7k4pMkq4OdY24hBCX1IhLzjx407WZrmqZXCr9kkDZCXIZ8v7OIOHvaBsQkKOqTn0PNlvwJY3yq5Jz5HnwovuZ1BbHokxuiznLBORpxiTpwcMV1ru_4mJbMtKRB29b8J93_u8BP758LM_hRv_gyyAZ7A33n8BNWS9Fviu4CRuzcm6fwvXsdDauymf1okb4ftWL4jeOsIUb
linkToPdf	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9NAEB61KUJcCoiXS4EBwQlM4_Xa7h4QKrRRq1ZRhEDqzayd3TZSagc7aZofxoVfx4xju6CK3nrgFie7m9X6m53ZnccH8FqoVFlSq24iLafkCOWqSAdu19dpolXCTDUV2UTU728fH6vBCvxqcmE4rLLZE6uNepinfEe-Jdj0Dpihe8vWYRGD3d7HyQ-XGaTY09rQaSwhcmgWczq-lR8OduldvxGit_f1875bMwy4KZ1rpq5U3ZRUcBISsKXVKvBlkmhLqNZqW4cyMsYaabTxSI2FQyk8E4iuMDrwNCeh-jTuKqxFZGTIDqx92usPvrQ-DJpr5SlVVYC9p-qUnSpxj9n8OPjXd9mNJt2Lv9Ti6ikHZV61eK94aysl2Lv7Py_fPVivTW_cWcrKfVgx2QP4WRdGHaPOhljo4ajRBliYcjaelphbtMwdhnbGV4s4yrCuRlvi_DRHTsMr5vSIzErD1SRo7ZAvuPFMn2TLLNHxAuusgLEZ4kmRz7kRaa_yPbLrbYph-Mew3FnjmdEZWuqSz93ZhCcS4IIWrnwI325kpR5BJ8sz8wQwTZVWOlABmTfSow_aesLIhAz1MLBR4IDXIClO6zrvTDcyjtsK1RX6YkJfXKEvvnDgbdtnsqxycm3rVwTQtiEXKN_fOYr5Ozog-GTCynPPgc0GiHG9LZbxJQodeNn-TBsae6l0ZvIZt_HJBo2opQOPl7hv_4rLcIlQhQ68awThcvB_T3jj-rm8gNskC_HRQf_wKdwRlVRyEOEmdKbFzDyDW-n5dFQWz2sJR_h-01LxG6Bjjzs
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+and+radiological+results+of+final+fusion+in+patients+who+underwent+lengthening+with+magnetically+controlled+growing+rods.+About+66+patients+with+a+mean+follow-up+of+5+years&rft.jtitle=European+spine+journal&rft.au=Mainard%2C+Nicolas&rft.au=Saghbini%2C+Elie&rft.au=Langlais%2C+Tristan&rft.au=Vialle%2C+Raphael&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.issn=1432-0932&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00586-023-07834-x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0940-6719&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0940-6719&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0940-6719&client=summon