How to govern business services exchanges: Contractual and relational issues

With firms concentrating on core competencies, more emphasis has been placed on outsourcing and dealing with external sourcing agents. This has led to a stronger academic focus on buyer–seller exchanges and the corresponding mechanisms for governing these exchanges. This paper gives an overview of p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of management reviews : IJMR Vol. 9; no. 3; pp. 237 - 258
Main Authors: Vandaele, Darline, Rangarajan, Deva, Gemmel, Paul, Lievens, Annouk
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2007
Subjects:
ISSN:1460-8545, 1468-2370
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:With firms concentrating on core competencies, more emphasis has been placed on outsourcing and dealing with external sourcing agents. This has led to a stronger academic focus on buyer–seller exchanges and the corresponding mechanisms for governing these exchanges. This paper gives an overview of previous research investigating the exchange governance phenomenon based on transaction cost theory or co‐operative interorganizational relationships. The results reveal that few research studies have investigated the overall picture of exchange governance, including both contractual and relational governance and taking into account antecedents as well as performance outcomes of the governance mechanisms involved. Moreover, despite the service‐dominant logic shift, limited attention is given to specific service characteristics and their impact on exchange governance. This paper attempts to meld economic and social related antecedents into a model with regard to exchange governance in business services settings. Contractual and relational governance issues and their impact on performance outcomes are also considered. The resulting model indicates that to govern business services exchanges efficiently, more emphasis should be placed on behavioral uncertainty, human and process asset specificity and contractual governance. The paper concludes by discussing several directions for future research.
Bibliography:istex:A0F0D9A21E168CAF81702C79AE842FFC5F8BD3FE
ArticleID:IJMR212
ark:/67375/WNG-ZLM336CG-G
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:1460-8545
1468-2370
DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00212.x