Speaking truth to power? Anti-bureaucratic romanticism from critical organizational theorizing to the White House

In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflictin...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Organization (London, England) Ročník 27; číslo 3; s. 441 - 453
Hlavní autoři: Lopdrup-Hjorth, Thomas, du Gay, Paul
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: London, England SAGE Publications 01.05.2020
Sage Publications Ltd
Témata:
ISSN:1350-5084, 1461-7323
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:In spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance toward bureaucracy and the state. In this article, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In doing so, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1350-5084
1461-7323
DOI:10.1177/1350508419830622