A close look at a systematic method for analyzing sets of security advice
We carry out a detailed analysis of the security advice coding method (SAcoding) of Barrera et al., which is designed to analyze security advice in the sense of measuring actionability and categorizing advice items as practices, policies, principles, or outcomes. The main part of our analysis explor...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cybersecurity (Oxford) Jg. 9; H. 1 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
2023
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 2057-2085, 2057-2093 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | We carry out a detailed analysis of the security advice coding method (SAcoding) of Barrera et al., which is designed to analyze security advice in the sense of measuring actionability and categorizing advice items as practices, policies, principles, or outcomes. The main part of our analysis explores the extent to which a second coder’s assignment of codes to advice items agrees with that of a first, for a dataset of 1013 security advice items nominally addressing Internet of Things devices. More broadly, we seek a deeper understanding of the soundness and utility of the SAcoding method, and the degree to which it meets the design goal of reducing subjectivity in assigning codes to security advice items. Our analysis results in suggestions for modifications to the coding tree methodology, and some recommendations. We believe the coding tree approach may be of interest for analysis of qualitative data beyond security advice datasets alone. |
|---|---|
| Bibliographie: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 2057-2085 2057-2093 |
| DOI: | 10.1093/cybsec/tyad013 |