Geometry optimization for proton-exchange membrane fuel cells with sequential quadratic programming method

Integration between COMSOL Multiphysics™ and MATLAB™ offers a useful option for the self-automated geometry optimization in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCS). It overcomes the difficulties of automatically re-generating high-quality computational meshes and subsequently running the simula...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of power sources Vol. 186; no. 1; pp. 10 - 21
Main Authors: Xing, Xiu Qing, Lum, Kah Wai, Poh, Hee Joo, Wu, Yan Ling
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 2009
Elsevier
Subjects:
ISSN:0378-7753, 1873-2755
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Integration between COMSOL Multiphysics™ and MATLAB™ offers a useful option for the self-automated geometry optimization in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCS). It overcomes the difficulties of automatically re-generating high-quality computational meshes and subsequently running the simulations to evaluate the objective function values using commercial software in computational fuel cell dynamics-based designs. Geometry optimization studies of an air-breathing PEMFC searching for the optimum channel ratio at the anode and the optimum open ratio at the cathode, are undertaken. A sequential quadratic programming method is selected to deal with the constrained design problems, while the objective functions are evaluated by running the three-dimensional simulation script of COMSOL™ under the MATLAB™ environment. Simulation results show that for the air-breathing PEM fuel cell operated at 353 K and one standard atmosphere pressure, when the anode channel ratio is fixed at 10%, the optimum cathode open ratios are very similar for the cell operated at voltages of 0.7 and 0.4 V, namely, 49.8% for 0.7 V and 49.5% for 0.4 V. When the cathode open ratio is set at 80% with a cell voltage of 0.7 V, the optimum anode channel ratio is found to be 34.7%.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0378-7753
1873-2755
DOI:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.09.096