A comparison of several enumerative algorithms for Sudoku
Sudoku is a puzzle played of an n × n grid where n is the square of a positive integer m. The most common size is n=9. The grid is partitioned into n subgrids of size m × m. The player must place exactly one number from the set N={1, ..., n} in each row and each column of as well as in each subgrid....
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | The Journal of the Operational Research Society Ročník 65; číslo 10; s. 1602 - 1610 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
London
Taylor & Francis
01.10.2014
Palgrave Macmillan Palgrave Macmillan UK Taylor & Francis Ltd |
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 0160-5682, 1476-9360 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Shrnutí: | Sudoku is a puzzle played of an n × n grid
where n is the square of a positive integer m. The most common size is n=9. The grid is partitioned into n subgrids of size m × m. The player must place exactly one number from the set N={1, ..., n} in each row and each column of
as well as in each subgrid. A grid is provided with some numbers already in place, called givens. In this paper, some relationships between Sudoku and several operations research problems are presented. We model the problem by means of two mathematical programming formulations. The first one consists of an integer linear programming model, while the second one is a tighter non-linear integer programming formulation. We then describe several enumerative algorithms to solve the puzzle and compare their relative efficiencies. Two basic backtracking algorithms are first described for the general Sudoku. We then solve both formulations by means of constraint programming. Computational experiments are performed to compare the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed algorithms. Our implementation of a backtracking algorithm can solve most benchmark instances of size 9 within 0.02 s, while no such instance was solved within that time by any other method. Our implementation is also much faster than an existing alternative algorithm. |
|---|---|
| Bibliografie: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 0160-5682 1476-9360 |
| DOI: | 10.1057/jors.2013.114 |