Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Status Epilepticus

Status epilepticus (SE) treatment strategies vary substantially from one institution to another due to the lack of data to support one treatment over another. To provide guidance for the acute treatment of SE in critically ill patients, the Neurocritical Care Society organized a writing committee to...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Neurocritical care Ročník 17; číslo 1; s. 3 - 23
Hlavní autori: Brophy, Gretchen M., Bell, Rodney, Claassen, Jan, Alldredge, Brian, Bleck, Thomas P., Glauser, Tracy, LaRoche, Suzette M., Riviello, James J., Shutter, Lori, Sperling, Michael R., Treiman, David M., Vespa, Paul M.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: New York Humana Press Inc 01.08.2012
Springer Nature B.V
Predmet:
Abscesses
Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use
Benzodiazepines
Clinical trials
Coma
Committees
Convulsions & seizures
Critical Care - standards
Critical Care Medicine
Data processing
Drug withdrawal
Encephalitis
Epilepsy
Etiology
Evidence-Based Medicine - standards
Heart
Humans
Intensive
Internal Medicine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meningitis
Nervous system
Neurology
Patients
Review
Status Epilepticus - classification
Status Epilepticus - diagnosis
Status Epilepticus - drug therapy
Stroke
Traumatic brain injury
Guideline
Seizure
Status epilepticus
EEG
Antiepileptic treatment
ISSN:1541-6933, 1556-0961, 1556-0961
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:Status epilepticus (SE) treatment strategies vary substantially from one institution to another due to the lack of data to support one treatment over another. To provide guidance for the acute treatment of SE in critically ill patients, the Neurocritical Care Society organized a writing committee to evaluate the literature and develop an evidence-based and expert consensus practice guideline. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed and studies meeting the criteria established by the writing committee were evaluated. Recommendations were developed based on the literature using standardized assessment methods from the American Heart Association and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation systems, as well as expert opinion when sufficient data were lacking.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Conference-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Instructional Material/Guideline-5
ObjectType-Article-3
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1541-6933
1556-0961
1556-0961
DOI:10.1007/s12028-012-9695-z