Comparison of a 1-MHz and a 2-MHz probe for microembolus detection using transcranial Doppler ultrasound
Objectives: Clinically silent microembolic signals (MES) can be detected by transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD). There is theoretical evidence that lower ultrasound emission frequencies may lead to a higher signal intensity and thus sensitivity to detect MES. We compared a 1-MHz probe with a 2-MHz...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Neurological research (New York) Vol. 27; no. 5; pp. 471 - 476 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
England
Taylor & Francis
01.07.2005
Maney Publishing |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0161-6412, 1743-1328 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Objectives: Clinically silent microembolic signals (MES) can be detected by transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD). There is theoretical evidence that lower ultrasound emission frequencies may lead to a higher signal intensity and thus sensitivity to detect MES. We compared a 1-MHz probe with a 2-MHz probe regarding sensitivity in the detection of MES. Moreover, embolus detection by transcranial Doppler ultrasound is very time consuming and semi-automated detection is mandatory. Therefore, we studied an on-line algorithm using the bi-gate technique and the two transmission frequencies.
Methods: After defining detection thresholds of ≥ 12 dB (1 MHz) and ≥ 10 dB (2 MHz) with eight normal subjects as MES-negative controls, taking into account natural fluctuations of the Doppler spectrum, we studied 36 patients with ischaemic events and five asymptomatic patients with incidental embolic sources. All patients subsequently underwent a 1-hour unilateral embolus detection from the middle cerebral artery (MCA) or the posterior cerebral artery (PCA), respectively, using 1 and 2 MHz for 30 minutes each in a randomized order. The software algorithm was compared with a blinded off-line analysis by an experienced observer as a gold standard.
Results: The investigator detected 198 MES (range 0-41 MES) in the recordings of 29 patients out of the 41 patients using the 1-MHz probe and 101 MES (range 0-32 MES) in the recordings of 14 patients using the 2-MHz probe (p=0.0007). Sensitivity of the software to detect MES confirmed by the investigator was 31% using 1 MHz and 41% using 2 MHz. The positive predictive value was 6 and 30%, respectively.
Discussion: The sensitivity and positive predictive values of the automated algorithm to detect MES were unacceptably low for clinical practice with both frequencies. The use of 1 MHz instead of 2 MHz may, however, be useful when evaluating the recordings off-line by an experienced blinded observer. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-General Information-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
| ISSN: | 0161-6412 1743-1328 |
| DOI: | 10.1179/016164105X15695 |