Comparison and Extension of Approximate 4-2 Compressors for Low-Power Approximate Multipliers

Approximate multipliers attract a large interest in the scientific literature that proposes several circuits built with approximate 4-2 compressors. Due to the large number of proposed solutions, the designer who wishes to use an approximate 4-2 compressor is faced with the problem of selecting the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on circuits and systems. I, Regular papers Vol. 67; no. 9; pp. 3021 - 3034
Main Authors: Strollo, Antonio Giuseppe Maria, Napoli, Ettore, De Caro, Davide, Petra, Nicola, Meo, Gennaro Di
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York IEEE 01.09.2020
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects:
ISSN:1549-8328, 1558-0806
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Approximate multipliers attract a large interest in the scientific literature that proposes several circuits built with approximate 4-2 compressors. Due to the large number of proposed solutions, the designer who wishes to use an approximate 4-2 compressor is faced with the problem of selecting the right topology. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey and comparison of approximate 4-2 compressors previously proposed in literature. We present also a novel approximate compressor, so that a total of twelve different approximate 4-2 compressors are analyzed. The investigated circuits are employed to design <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">8\times 8 </tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">16\times 16 </tex-math></inline-formula> multipliers, implemented in 28nm CMOS technology. For each operand size we analyze two multiplier configurations, with different levels of approximations, both signed and unsigned. Our study highlights that there is no unique winning approximate compressor topology since the best solution depends on the required precision, on the signedness of the multiplier and on the considered error metric.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1549-8328
1558-0806
DOI:10.1109/TCSI.2020.2988353