Quantitative and qualitative differences worth considering in approaching critical infrastructures resilience

Through the implicit connections between risk, safety, protection and, last but not least, resiliency, that need to be managed, critical infrastructures have become a subject of increasing interest both for specialists and for academics. Based on this premise, this article analyzes in terms of opera...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:MATEC web of conferences Ročník 121; s. 11004
Hlavní autoři: Badea, Dorel, Bârsan, Ghiță, Virca, Ioan, Iancu, Dumitru
Médium: Journal Article Konferenční příspěvek
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Les Ulis EDP Sciences 01.01.2017
Témata:
ISSN:2261-236X, 2274-7214, 2261-236X
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Through the implicit connections between risk, safety, protection and, last but not least, resiliency, that need to be managed, critical infrastructures have become a subject of increasing interest both for specialists and for academics. Based on this premise, this article analyzes in terms of operational performance several internationally used solutions for assessing resilience, having in view the desire to choose the best in order to be presented in some specialized disciplines of the postgraduate curricula that are annually presented in the educational offer of the Land Forces Academy. The authors also present their own vision on approaching the resilience of critical infrastructures so that it can harmoniously be integrated into the security plans of the holders or operators of such special assets.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Conference Proceeding-1
SourceType-Conference Papers & Proceedings-1
content type line 21
ISSN:2261-236X
2274-7214
2261-236X
DOI:10.1051/matecconf/201712111004