Comparing the efficacy of mindfulness-based therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression in head-to-head randomized controlled trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis of equivalence

While Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is recommended as first-line treatment for depression, a significant minority do not show an adequate treatment response. Despite evidence for the efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Therapies (MBT) both in treating current depression and preventing relapse, it rem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical psychology review Jg. 100; S. 102234
Hauptverfasser: Sverre, Kristine Trettø, Nissen, Eva Rames, Farver-Vestergaard, Ingeborg, Johannsen, Maja, Zachariae, Robert
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2023
Schlagworte:
Adult
Adults
Affective disorders
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy - methods
Depression - therapy
Humans
Mindfulness - methods
Mindfulness-based interventions
Psychological treatment
Psychotherapy
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Treatment Outcome
Mindfulness-based interventions
Psychotherapy
Adults
Affective disorders
Psychological treatment
ISSN:0272-7358, 1873-7811, 1873-7811
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:While Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is recommended as first-line treatment for depression, a significant minority do not show an adequate treatment response. Despite evidence for the efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Therapies (MBT) both in treating current depression and preventing relapse, it remains unknown whether MBT and CBT are equivalent in the treatment of current depression. Five databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly comparing MBT with CBT and including depression as primary or secondary outcome. When pooling the results of 30 independent RCTs with a total of 2750 participants, MBT and CBT were statistically significantly equivalent at both post-intervention (Hedges's g = −0.009; p < .001) and follow-up (g = −0.033; p = .001). Supplementary Bayesian analyses provided further support for the alternative hypothesis of no difference between MBT and CBT. When exploring possible sources of heterogeneity, the differences at follow-up were smaller between CBT and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) than between CBT and mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) (Slope = 0.37;p = .022). The currently available evidence suggests that that MBT and CBT are equally efficacious in treating current adult depression. It remains unclear whether the similar effects of the two intervention types are due to different mechanisms or common factors. •We tested the equivalence of mindfulness-based therapy (MBT) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for treating depression.•Thirty randomized controlled trials of a total of 2705 participants were included.•MBT and CBT was statistically significantly equivalent in treating depression at both post-treatment and follow-up.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0272-7358
1873-7811
1873-7811
DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102234