Communication Enhancement and Best Practices for Co-Managing Dual Care Rural Veteran Patients by VA and Non-VA Providers A Survey Study

Many rural Veteran patients receive healthcare services from both Veterans Affairs (VA) and non-VA providers. Effective management of dual care Veteran patients to ensure the best clinical outcomes is a VA mission. The previous VA studies indicate that coordination between VA and non-VA providers ha...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of community health Ročník 39; číslo 3; s. 552 - 561
Hlavní autoři: Shi, Jing, Peng, Yidong, Erdem, Ergin, Woodbridge, Peter, Fetrick, Ann
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Boston Springer Science + Business Media 01.06.2014
Springer US
Springer Nature B.V
Témata:
ISSN:0094-5145, 1573-3610, 1573-3610
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Many rural Veteran patients receive healthcare services from both Veterans Affairs (VA) and non-VA providers. Effective management of dual care Veteran patients to ensure the best clinical outcomes is a VA mission. The previous VA studies indicate that coordination between VA and non-VA providers has been lacking for dual care management of Veteran patients. In this study, we propose that VA proactively shares information with non-VA providers to enhance the communication process and identify the best practices to be carried out by both VA and non-VA providers for better coordination. Structured questionnaires are designed and distributed to VA and non-VA providers to obtain their evaluations on the proposed VA proactive information sharing approaches and the best practice items for dual care management. The non-VA provider respondents largely support the proposed proactive sharing items by VA, with the lowest average score being 3.96 out of a 5.0 scale on one item. In terms of the best practice items on co-managing dual care patients, three out of five items are overall rated higher than 4.0 from both sides. A pair-wise comparison between VA and non-VA perspectives further shows that the difference in average ratings of a proposed item could be significant. For such best practice items, the implementations from both sides may not be most effective.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0094-5145
1573-3610
1573-3610
DOI:10.1007/s10900-013-9797-3