Conservation and natural resource management: where are all the women?

There is evidence from the development and humanitarian sectors that purposeful engagement of women can increase the impact of development. We conducted a literature review to examine whether this is also evident in conservation and natural resource management. The following themes emerged from our...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Oryx Ročník 55; číslo 6; s. 860 - 867
Hlavní autoři: James, Robyn, Gibbs, Bridget, Whitford, Laura, Leisher, Craig, Konia, Ruth, Butt, Nathalie
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.11.2021
Témata:
Biodiversity
Climate change
Conservation
Decision making
Empowerment
Gender
Gender and conservation
Leadership
Literature reviews
Men
nationalities and ethnic groups
Natural resource management
Natural resources
Norms
Oryx
Poverty
religion
Resource management
Review
Women
Australia
Asia
Africa
environment
gender
Conservation
leadership
equity
natural resource management
governance
women
ISSN:0030-6053, 1365-3008, 1365-3008
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:There is evidence from the development and humanitarian sectors that purposeful engagement of women can increase the impact of development. We conducted a literature review to examine whether this is also evident in conservation and natural resource management. The following themes emerged from our review: existing societal and cultural norms affect and generally limit how women can engage in conservation and natural resource management; women interact differently with the environment than men, so if they are excluded, their knowledge and perspectives on particular resources may not be considered in conservation actions; and there is often a lack of resources or dedicated effort by conservation or natural resource management programmes to understand and address the barriers that prevent women's engagement. Although there was evidence of a positive relationship between the engagement of women and environmental outcomes, some studies showed that positive conservation outcomes do not necessarily benefit women, and when women are not considered, conservation activities can perpetuate existing inequities. We conclude that although the importance of integrating gender into conservation is acknowledged in the literature, there is a need to examine how women can be meaningfully engaged in conservation. This must go beyond treating women as a homogenous group, to consider intersectionality including race, ethnicity, age, religion, poverty and disability. In addition, conservation and natural resource management institutions need to address the inclusion of women in their own staff and programmes.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0030-6053
1365-3008
1365-3008
DOI:10.1017/S0030605320001349