Repression and Dissent in Moments of Uncertainty: Panel Data Evidence from Zimbabwe

State repression and protest are common in modern authoritarian and hybrid regimes, yet individual responses to these events are not well understood. This article draws on unique panel data from the months spanning Zimbabwe’s 2018 election, which we view as a moment of uncertainty for most Zimbabwea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American political science review Jg. 118; H. 2; S. 584 - 601
Hauptverfasser: LEBAS, ADRIENNE, YOUNG, LAUREN E.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.05.2024
Schlagworte:
Activism
Beliefs
Data collection
Demonstrations & protests
Dissent
Economic crisis
Elections
Emotional Response
Emotions
Evidence
Incumbency
Individual differences
Leadership
Mass media effects
Mobilization
Panel data
Politics
Population Distribution
Psychological Patterns
Risk perception
Social media
Social networks
Supporters
Uncertainty
Zimbabwe
ISSN:0003-0554, 1537-5943
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:State repression and protest are common in modern authoritarian and hybrid regimes, yet individual responses to these events are not well understood. This article draws on unique panel data from the months spanning Zimbabwe’s 2018 election, which we view as a moment of uncertainty for most Zimbabwean citizens. Using a difference-in-difference estimator, we estimate change in individual protest intentions following exposure to repression and dissent and we assess three individual-level mechanisms hypothesized to drive responses. We find evidence that exposure to local repression and dissent are mobilizing among opposition supporters and nonpartisans. Analysis of potential mechanisms suggests that the effects of exposure to dissent may be driven by information updating, whereas relational and emotional mechanisms seem to drive backlash against repression, despite increased perceptions of risk. We find no evidence of counter-mobilization by ruling party supporters, and little effect of exposure to contentious events over social media.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0003-0554
1537-5943
DOI:10.1017/S0003055423000230