Stochastic MILP model for optimal timing of investments in CO2 capture technologies under uncertainty in prices
Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of existing coal-fired power plants is a necessary action to attain the global reductions committed in the Kyoto Protocol. In the framework of a cap and trade system, we propose a two-stage stochastic mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) approach for the opti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Energy (Oxford) Jg. 54; S. 343 - 351 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Kidlington
Elsevier Ltd
01.06.2013
Elsevier |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 0360-5442 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of existing coal-fired power plants is a necessary action to attain the global reductions committed in the Kyoto Protocol. In the framework of a cap and trade system, we propose a two-stage stochastic mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) approach for the optimal investment timing and operation of a CO2 capture system under uncertainty in the CO2 allowance price. In the MILP, uncertainties are modeled via scenarios that are generated from a set of probability functions obtained using the Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) approach in conjunction with Monte Carlo sampling. The model takes into account two economic objectives: the expected net profit and the financial risk. We demonstrate the capabilities of the tool presented through a case study based on a coal fired power plant. Our MILP approach can be applied to a wide range of processes and industries that deal with carbon sequestration issues.
► We search the optimal investment timing and operational decisions in CCS technology. ► We propose a two-stage stochastic mixed-integer linear programming problem (MILP). ► Uncertain CO2 prices are introduced via scenarios using GBM and Monte Carlo sampling. ► Solutions selected must maximize the expected profit and minimize the financial risk. ► This decision tool will help to select between risk-taker and risk-averse solutions. |
|---|---|
| Bibliographie: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.068 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 0360-5442 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.068 |