Scaling-up ecological understanding with remote sensing and causal inference

Current biodiversity policy goals demand large-scale conservation and management actions.Ecological relationships operating in fine-scale experiments and observational datasets do not necessarily apply at management-relevant spatial scales.Remote sensing offers a solution for understanding ecologica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) Jg. 40; H. 2; S. 122 - 135
Hauptverfasser: Van Cleemput, Elisa, Adler, Peter B., Suding, Katharine Nash, Rebelo, Alanna Jane, Poulter, Benjamin, Dee, Laura E.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: England Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2025
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0169-5347, 1872-8383, 1872-8383
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Current biodiversity policy goals demand large-scale conservation and management actions.Ecological relationships operating in fine-scale experiments and observational datasets do not necessarily apply at management-relevant spatial scales.Remote sensing offers a solution for understanding ecological relationships at scale, but inferring causality from remotely sensed data presents various challenges.Confounding variables and measurement errors, which are inevitable in large-scale observational datasets, can create bias and lead to spurious conclusions about causal relationships.Remote sensing products can help to scale-up causal ecological relationships, but only if they are accompanied by careful analyses and inferences that address challenges posed by confounding variables and measurement errors. Decades of empirical ecological research have focused on understanding ecological dynamics at local scales. Remote sensing products can help to scale-up ecological understanding to support management actions that need to be implemented across large spatial extents. This new avenue for remote sensing applications requires careful consideration of sources of potential bias that can lead to spurious causal relationships. We propose that causal inference techniques can help to mitigate biases arising from confounding variables and measurement errors that are inherent in remote sensing products. Adopting these statistical techniques will require interdisciplinary collaborations between local ecologists, remote sensing specialists, and experts in causal inference. The insights from integrating 'big' observational data from remote sensing with causal inference could be essential for bridging biodiversity science and conservation. Decades of empirical ecological research have focused on understanding ecological dynamics at local scales. Remote sensing products can help to scale-up ecological understanding to support management actions that need to be implemented across large spatial extents. This new avenue for remote sensing applications requires careful consideration of sources of potential bias that can lead to spurious causal relationships. We propose that causal inference techniques can help to mitigate biases arising from confounding variables and measurement errors that are inherent in remote sensing products. Adopting these statistical techniques will require interdisciplinary collaborations between local ecologists, remote sensing specialists, and experts in causal inference. The insights from integrating 'big' observational data from remote sensing with causal inference could be essential for bridging biodiversity science and conservation.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0169-5347
1872-8383
1872-8383
DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2024.09.006