Who and what gets recognized in digital agriculture: agriculture 4.0 at the intersectionality of (Dis)Ableism, labor, and recognition justice Who and what gets recognized in digital agriculture: agriculture 4.0 at the intersectionality of (Dis)Ableism, labor, and recognition justice

This paper builds on prior critical scholarship on Agriculture 4.0—an umbrella term to reference the utilization of robotics and automation, AI, remote sensing, big data, and the like in agriculture—especially the literature focusing on issues relating to equity and social sustainability. Critical a...

Celý popis

Uložené v:

Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:	Agriculture and human values Ročník 41; číslo 4; s. 1465 - 1480
Hlavný autor:	Carolan, Michael
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	English
Vydavateľské údaje:	Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.12.2024 Springer Nature B.V
Predmet:	Agribusiness Agricultural Economics Agricultural Ethics Agricultural production Agriculture Arizona Automation Big Data California Colorado Decision making Development Studies Digital agriculture Disability discrimination Distributive justice Education energy Environmental Sociology experimental design Humanities and Social Sciences Intersectionality Labor Leisure multidisciplinary New Mexico Pattern recognition People with disabilities Philosophy Procedural justice Qualitative analysis Remote sensing Robotics Scholarships & fellowships Science Social impact Social sustainability States Subjectivity Sustainable Development Work Wyoming California New Mexico Wyoming Colorado Arizona Justice Disability Automation Affordance Leisure Gender Labor Embodiment Robotics Just transition Digital agriculture
ISSN:	0889-048X, 1572-8366
On-line prístup:	Získať plný text
Tagy:	Pridať tag Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!

Popis
Shrnutí:	This paper builds on prior critical scholarship on Agriculture 4.0—an umbrella term to reference the utilization of robotics and automation, AI, remote sensing, big data, and the like in agriculture—especially the literature focusing on issues relating to equity and social sustainability. Critical agrifood scholarship has spent considerable energy interrogating who gets what, how decisions get made, and who counts as a “stakeholder” in the context of decision making, questions relating to distributive justice, procedural justice, and representative justice, respectively. Less attention, however, has been paid in this literature to the subject of recognition justice. Recognition justice asks the question, “Who are subjects of justice?” That query, however, is easily to oversimplify. As subjectivity is neither monolithic nor fixed, implied in these discussions are deeper questions having to do with the characteristics of one’s subjectivity that deserve moral recognition. This act of translation, from justice-in-theory to justice-in-practice, also complicates the evaluation of whether Agriculture 4.0 platforms are just, or not. These recognition justice tensions are explored by leveraging qualitative data collected through forty-two face-to-face interviews with individuals on farms located in the US states of Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, and Wyoming who utilize these platforms. The study design intentionally oversampled for persons with disabilities, which highlights another distinguishing characteristic of the paper relative to critical Agriculture 4.0 scholarship. In addition to exposing certain ableist assumptions in these discussions, the sampling technique proved invaluable for interrogating how we think about labor, work, and leisure in agriculture. The paper specifically discusses how Agriculture 4.0, for example, shapes conceptions of what it means to be “able to work,” “willing to work,” “hard working,” etc.
Bibliografia:	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23
ISSN:	0889-048X 1572-8366
DOI:	10.1007/s10460-024-10560-9