Team resilience: A scoping review of conceptual and empirical work

The purpose of this scoping review was to examine the literature on team resilience to gain insight into current thinking regarding its definition and conceptualisation, and to identify how researchers have operationalised and measured this concept. We conducted a systematic scoping review using the...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Work and stress Ročník 34; číslo 1; s. 57 - 81
Hlavní autoři: Chapman, Michael T., Lines, Robin L. J., Crane, Monique, Ducker, Kagan J., Ntoumanis, Nikos, Peeling, Peter, Parker, Sharon K., Quested, Eleanor, Temby, Philip, Thøgersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie, Gucciardi, Daniel F.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Abingdon Routledge 02.01.2020
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Témata:
Coordination
emergence
emergent construct
Literature
Methodological problems
multilevel theory
Reliance
Resilience
Search engines
Search process
Search strategies
Systematic review
Teams
Teamwork
ISSN:0267-8373, 1464-5335
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:The purpose of this scoping review was to examine the literature on team resilience to gain insight into current thinking regarding its definition and conceptualisation, and to identify how researchers have operationalised and measured this concept. We conducted a systematic scoping review using the 5-phase approach proposed by Arksey and O'Malley. A total of seven databases were searched, followed by a citation search of eligible papers via Google Scholar. Of the 275 articles identified via the search process, 27 papers were deemed eligible for review. Several key findings regarding the literature on team resilience were observed: (i) definitions varied in terms of content (e.g. input or process), breadth (e.g. unidimensional versus multidimensional), and quality (e.g. essential and necessary attributes of key components); (ii) there was a predominance of single-level conceptualisations of team resilience; and (iii) there has been a reliance on cross-sectional research designs in empirical studies, which is incongruent with the dynamic nature of this concept. Key recommendations from this scoping review focus on definitional, theoretical, and methodological issues.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Literature Review-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
ISSN:0267-8373
1464-5335
DOI:10.1080/02678373.2018.1529064