Word Order, Action, and the Brain: A Reply to Arbib

In a recent paper in this journal, I argued that the crosslinguistic prevalence of subject–object–verb and subject–verb–object word orders reflects the sequential and hierarchical representation of action in Broca's area. Arbib (2015) discusses that paper in the context of broader computational...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Language and linguistics compass Ročník 9; číslo 3; s. 150 - 156
Hlavný autor: Kemmerer, David
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2015
Predmet:
ISSN:1749-818X, 1749-818X
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:In a recent paper in this journal, I argued that the crosslinguistic prevalence of subject–object–verb and subject–verb–object word orders reflects the sequential and hierarchical representation of action in Broca's area. Arbib (2015) discusses that paper in the context of broader computational, neuroscientific, and evolutionary issues, and presents a critique of my specific proposal. Here, I respond to his concerns and defend my original account.
Bibliografia:istex:CDDD2C9CDEE8390E2BADA528A7BFF304B1199EE9
ArticleID:LNC312132
ark:/67375/WNG-V3R794PN-H
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1749-818X
1749-818X
DOI:10.1111/lnc3.12132