Word Order, Action, and the Brain: A Reply to Arbib

In a recent paper in this journal, I argued that the crosslinguistic prevalence of subject–object–verb and subject–verb–object word orders reflects the sequential and hierarchical representation of action in Broca's area. Arbib (2015) discusses that paper in the context of broader computational...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Language and linguistics compass Ročník 9; číslo 3; s. 150 - 156
Hlavní autor: Kemmerer, David
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2015
Témata:
ISSN:1749-818X, 1749-818X
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:In a recent paper in this journal, I argued that the crosslinguistic prevalence of subject–object–verb and subject–verb–object word orders reflects the sequential and hierarchical representation of action in Broca's area. Arbib (2015) discusses that paper in the context of broader computational, neuroscientific, and evolutionary issues, and presents a critique of my specific proposal. Here, I respond to his concerns and defend my original account.
Bibliografie:istex:CDDD2C9CDEE8390E2BADA528A7BFF304B1199EE9
ArticleID:LNC312132
ark:/67375/WNG-V3R794PN-H
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1749-818X
1749-818X
DOI:10.1111/lnc3.12132