ROSE: A neurocomputational architecture for syntax

A comprehensive neural model of language must accommodate four components: representations, operations, structures and encoding. Recent intracranial research has begun to map out the feature space associated with syntactic processes, but the field lacks a unified framework that can direct invasive n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neurolinguistics Vol. 70; p. 101180
Main Author: Murphy, Elliot
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2024
Subjects:
Delta
Merge
Neural oscillations
Syntax
Traveling waves
Neural oscillations
Traveling waves
Merge
Syntax
Delta
ISSN:0911-6044, 1873-8052
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A comprehensive neural model of language must accommodate four components: representations, operations, structures and encoding. Recent intracranial research has begun to map out the feature space associated with syntactic processes, but the field lacks a unified framework that can direct invasive neural analyses. This article proposes a neurocomputational architecture for syntax, termed ROSE (Representation, Operation, Structure, Encoding). Under ROSE, the basic data structures of syntax are atomic features, types of mental representations (R), and are coded at the single-unit and ensemble level. Operations (O) transforming these units into manipulable objects accessible to subsequent structure-building levels are coded via high frequency broadband γ activity. Low frequency synchronization and cross-frequency coupling code for recursive structural inferences (S). Distinct forms of low frequency coupling encode these structures onto distinct workspaces (E). Causally connecting R to O is spike-phase/LFP coupling; connecting O to S is phase-amplitude coupling; connecting S to E are frontotemporal traveling oscillations. ROSE is reliant on neurophysiologically plausible mechanisms and provides an anatomically precise and falsifiable grounding for natural language syntax. •Reviews current neurobiological models of syntactic processing.•Proposes a novel neurocomputational architecture for syntax (ROSE).•Provides causal explanations for how distinct levels of ROSE mechanistically relate.•Explores falsifiability of model and new directions for ROSE.
ISSN:0911-6044
1873-8052
DOI:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2023.101180