Route Selection Decision-Making in an Intermodal Transport Network Using Game Theory

Traveling through a transport network, or ordering and delivering packets, involves fundamental decision-making processes which can be approached by game theory: Rather than simply choosing a route, individuals need to evaluate routes in the presence of the congestion resulting from the decisions ma...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Sustainability Ročník 13; číslo 8; s. 4443
Hlavní autoři: Bukvic, Lucija, Pasagic Skrinjar, Jasmina, Abramovic, Borna, Zitricky, Vladislav
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Basel MDPI AG 01.04.2021
Témata:
Costs
Data envelopment analysis
Decision making
Equilibrium
Game theory
Intermodal transportation
Methods
Nobel prizes
Prisoners
Rationality
Route surveying
Croatia
ISSN:2071-1050, 2071-1050
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Traveling through a transport network, or ordering and delivering packets, involves fundamental decision-making processes which can be approached by game theory: Rather than simply choosing a route, individuals need to evaluate routes in the presence of the congestion resulting from the decisions made by themselves and everyone else. In this paper, a game theory model for resolving route choices in transport network graphs is used. In the process of doing this, discovering a rather unexpected result known as Braess’s paradox, which shows that adding capacity to a network can sometimes actually cause congestion and an increase in transport costs. The decisions are made by non-cooperative players in a game theory environment known as prisoner’s dilemma. These methods are used to analyze routing problems by competing logistics operators on the transport network consisting of three Eastern Adriatic ports and an intermodal terminal in Budapest. The congestion game can be used in route selection regarding a decrease in transport costs for the carriers who are considered as rational players choosing the most sustainable solution.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2071-1050
2071-1050
DOI:10.3390/su13084443